Literature DB >> 30391445

High-flow versus standard nasal cannula in morbidly obese patients during colonoscopy: A prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Christina A Riccio1, Stephen Sarmiento2, Abu Minhajuddin2, Dawood Nasir2, Amanda A Fox2.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Morbid obesity is associated with adverse airway events including desaturation during deep sedation. Prior works have suggested that proprietary high-flow nasal cannula devices generate positive pressure to all airway structures and may be superior to standard (low-flow) nasal cannula for prevention of desaturation. We hypothesized that, at a similar fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), use of a High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) at maximum flow rate would result in a lower incidence of intra-procedural desaturation episodes in morbidly obese patients compared to standard nasal cannula (SNC) during deep sedation with propofol.
DESIGN: This is a pragmatic, prospective, randomized clinical trial at one hospital (NCT03148262, UTSW#112016-058). Morbidly obese patients were randomized to HFNC during propofol sedation for colonoscopy. HFNC was performed using maximum flow rates of 60 liters per minute (LPM) and FiO2 of 0.36-0.40, whereas SNC was performed at 4LPM. The primary endpoint was incidence of arterial oxygen desaturation <90% measured by pulse oximetry. At midpoint enrollment the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) performed a pre-planned O'Brien and Fleming futility test. MAIN
RESULTS: Patients were randomized to HFNC (n = 28) or SNC (n = 31). Interim analysis of the primary endpoint showed that the desaturation rates in the HFNC group (39.3%) and the SNC group (45.2%) were not significantly different (p = 0.79). The DMC halted the trial at that point due to futility.
CONCLUSION: At similar FiO2, HFNC was not significantly different from SNC for prevention of arterial oxygen desaturation in morbidly obese patients undergoing propofol sedation for colonoscopy.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Deep sedation; High-flow nasal cannula; Morbid obesity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30391445     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  16 in total

Review 1.  Should We Use High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Patients Receiving Gastrointestinal Endoscopies? Critical Appraisals through Updated Meta-Analyses with Multiple Methodologies and Depiction of Certainty of Evidence.

Authors:  Chi Chan Lee; Teressa Reanne Ju; Pei Chun Lai; Hsin-Ti Lin; Yen Ta Huang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Study on prevention of hypercapnia by nasal high flow in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography during intravenous anesthesia.

Authors:  Takao Ayuse; Hironori Sawase; Eisuke Ozawa; Kazuyoshi Nagata; Naohiro Komatsu; Takuro Sanuki; Shinji Kurata; Gaku Mishima; Naoki Hosogaya; Sawako Nakashima; Max Pinkham; Stanislav Tatkov; Nakao Kazuhiko
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  High-flow nasal oxygenation versus standard oxygenation for gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation. The prospective multicentre randomised controlled ODEPHI study protocol.

Authors:  Axelle Eugene; Lucie Fromont; Adrien Auvet; Olivier Baert; Willy-Serge Mfam; Francis Remerand; Thierry Boulain; Mai-Anh Nay
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Study on prevention of hypercapnia by Nasal High Flow in patients with endoscopic submucosal dissection during intravenous anesthesia.

Authors:  Takao Ayuse; Naoyuki Yamguchi; Keiichi Hashiguchi; Takuro Sanuki; Gaku Mishima; Shinji Kurata; Naoki Hosogaya; Sawako Nakashima; Max Pinkham; Stanislav Tatkov; Kazuhiko Nakao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  The effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannula during sedated digestive endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Xin Zhang; Xing-Xiang He; Yu-Ping Chen; Shuai Yang
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.175

6.  A comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and standard facemask as pre-oxygenation technique for general anesthesia: A PRISMA-compliant systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hsien-Cheng Kuo; Wan-Chi Liu; Chun-Cheng Li; Yih-Giun Cherng; Jui-Tai Chen; Hsiang-Ling Wu; Ying-Hsuan Tai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Deep sedation using propofol target-controlled infusion for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  María E García Guzzo; María S Fernandez; Delfina Sanchez Novas; Sandra S Salgado; Sergio A Terrasa; Gonzalo Domenech; Carlos A Teijido
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  A Bibliometric Analysis of Endoscopic Sedation Research: 2001-2020.

Authors:  Yi Qin; Sifan Chen; Yuanyuan Zhang; Wanfeng Liu; Yuxuan Lin; Xiaoying Chi; Xuemei Chen; Zhangjie Yu; Diansan Su
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-03

9.  A Comparison of Oxygenation Efficacy between High-Flow Nasal Cannulas and Standard Facemasks during Elective Tracheal Intubation for Patients with Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Yu-Ming Wu; Chun-Cheng Li; Shih-Yu Huang; Yen-Hao Su; Chien-Wun Wang; Jui-Tai Chen; Shih-Chiang Shen; Po-Han Lo; Yun-Ling Yang; Yih-Giun Cherng; Hsiang-Ling Wu; Ying-Hsuan Tai
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  A study on respiratory management in acute postoperative period by nasal high flow for patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Shinji Kurata; Gaku Mishima; Motohiro Sekino; Shuntaro Sato; Maximilian Pinkham; Stanislav Tatkov; Takao Ayuse
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.