Literature DB >> 30391339

Does Mitral Valve Calcium in Patients Undergoing Mitral Valve Replacement Portend Worse Survival?

Nishant Saran1, Kevin L Greason2, Hartzell V Schaff2, Sertac M Cicek2, Richard C Daly2, Simon Maltais2, John M Stulak2, Alberto Pochettino2, Katherine S King3, Joseph A Dearani2, Sameh M Said2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mitral annular calcification (MAC) is associated with worse outcomes after mitral valve replacement (MVR). With limited data available on long-term outcomes, we reviewed our experience of MVR in presence of MAC.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 1,710 consecutive patients who underwent MVR between January 2000 and December 2015 was performed. Patients with isolated primary MVR (n = 496) were included, whereas patients with concomitant cardiac surgery (n = 1,068), previous MVR (n = 110), and mitral valve (MV) endocarditis (n = 36) were excluded. MV calcification was classified as MAC present in anterior/posterior annulus and vertically at the level of leaflets/subvalvular apparatus. A conservative approach towards annular debridement was followed.
RESULTS: Our sample's mean age was 64.4 ± 14.1 years, and included 279 (56%) women. MV calcification was observed in 169 (34%) patients with MAC in 115 (23%). Older age, higher ejection fraction, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, dialysis, and previous aortic valve surgery were associated with increased prevalence of MAC. Patients with MV calcification had higher stroke rate (p = 0.040), patients with anterior leaflet and commissural calcification had higher pacemaker implantation (p = 0.010, p = 0.001, respectively), and patients with circumferential MAC had higher postoperative dialysis (p = 0.006). Operative mortality was not significantly different (p = 0.466) between MAC (n = 1, 1%) and non-MAC (n = 9, 2%) patients. MAC was associated with late mortality (unadjusted hazard ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.20 to 2.18), though on multivariable analysis age, diabetes, dialysis, hypertension, previous aortic valve surgery, previous coronary artery bypass grafting, and MVR with a bioprosthetic valve were found to be independent risk factors for mortality whereas MAC was not.
CONCLUSIONS: A conservative approach to treat MAC achieves satisfactory results. Patients with MAC have significant comorbidities contributing to a worse survival, though MAC in itself is not a risk factor for mortality.
Copyright © 2019 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30391339     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.07.098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  4 in total

Review 1.  Mitral annular calcification: challenges and future perspectives.

Authors:  Mathias Van Hemelrijck; Maurizio Taramasso; Gökhan Gülmez; Francesco Maisano; Carlos-A Mestres
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-01-27

Review 2.  Mitral Annular Calcification: Association with Atherosclerosis and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Luiz Rafael P Cavalcanti; Michel Pompeu B O Sá; Álvaro M Perazzo; Antonio C Escorel Neto; Rafael A F Gomes; Alexander Weymann; Konstantin Zhigalov; Arjang Ruhparwar; Ricardo C Lima
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 5.113

3.  Commentary: Seal the calcium.

Authors:  Juan A Crestanello
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2020-02-27

4.  Commentary: Enhanced open transcatheter mitral valve replacement: The ultimate hybrid approach.

Authors:  Jean Porterie; Dimitri Kalavrouziotis; Siamak Mohammadi
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2020-11-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.