Literature DB >> 30391219

A nationwide cohort study of resection rates and short-term outcomes in open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

Kjetil Søreide1, Frank Olsen2, Linn S Nymo3, Dyre Kleive4, Kristoffer Lassen5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Distal pancreatectomy (DP) is increasingly done by laparoscopy but data from routine practise are scarce. We describe practise in a national cohort.
METHODS: Data from the Norwegian Patient Register of all patients undergoing DP from 2012 to 2016. National resection rates were analysed. Short-term outcomes include length of stay, reoperation, readmissions and 90-day mortality. Risk is reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (c.i.).
RESULTS: Of 554 procedures, 327 (59%) were laparoscopic. Median age was 66 years (iqr 55-72) and 52% were women. Resection rates increased during the period for all DP (from 1.76 to 2.39 per 100.000/yr), and significantly for laparoscopic DP (adjusted R-square 0.858; P = 0.015). Elderly patients had more resection (r2 = 0.11; P = 0.019). Splenectomy (n = 427; 77%) was less likely with laparoscopy (laparoscopy 72% vs open 84%, respectively; OR 0.64, 95% c.i. 0.42-0.97; P = 0.035). Multivisceral resections occurred more often in open DP (5.3% vs 1.2% for laparoscopy, OR 4.51, 1.44-14.2; P = 0.008). Reoperation occurred in 34 (6%), readmission in 109 (20%), and mortality in 8 (1.4%). Hospital stay was shorter for laparoscopic DP.
CONCLUSION: Use of DP increases in the population, particularly in the elderly, with use of laparoscopic access and an association with a reduced hospital stay.
Copyright © 2018 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30391219     DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  6 in total

1.  Centralization of Pancreatic Surgery in Europe: an Update.

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide; Linn S Nymo; Kristoffer Lassen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Treatment and survival of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: 15-year national cohort.

Authors:  Linn Såve Nymo; Tor Åge Myklebust; Hanne Hamre; Bjørn Møller; Kristoffer Lassen
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-03-08

Review 3.  Observation or resection of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm: An ongoing tug of war.

Authors:  Jan Rune Aunan; Nigel B Jamieson; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-12-15

4.  Centralizing a national pancreatoduodenectomy service: striking the right balance.

Authors:  L S Nymo; D Kleive; K Waardal; E A Bringeland; J A Søreide; K J Labori; K E Mortensen; K Søreide; K Lassen
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-09-07

5.  Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a single centre propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Riccardo Casadei; Carlo Ingaldi; Claudio Ricci; Laura Alberici; Emilio De Raffele; Maria Chiara Vaccaro; Francesco Minni
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-04-03

6.  Comparison of 3 Minimally Invasive Methods Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yunxiao Lyu; Yunxiao Cheng; Bin Wang; SiCong Zhao; Liang Chen
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 1.455

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.