Literature DB >> 30389821

Hexokinase-2 Expression in 11C-Methionine-Positive, 18F-FDG-Negative Multiple Myeloma.

Stefan Kircher1,2, Antje Stolzenburg3, Klaus Martin Kortüm4, Malte Kircher3, Matteo Da Via4, Samuel Samnick3, Andreas K Buck3, Hermann Einsele4, Andreas Rosenwald1,2, Constantin Lapa5.   

Abstract

PET with 18F-FDG is the standard modality in nuclear medicine for imaging multiple myeloma (MM). However, viable MM as detected by MRI or PET with other metabolic tracers, including 11C-methionine, may be missed-for example, because of low hexokinase 2 (HK2) expression of tumor cells. The aim of this study was to further investigate potential reasons for PET false negativity.
Methods: A cohort of 15 mainly pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory biopsy-proven, serologically active MM who underwent both 18F-FDG and 11C-methionine PET/CT was retrospectively analyzed.
Results: In 9 of the 15 patients, 18F-FDG PET was negative in the presence of viable disease. In the remaining 6 patients, both 18F-FDG and 11C-methionine PET/CT revealed the same number of MM lesions. At immunohistochemistry, 18F-FDG-negative myeloma did not exhibit significant differences in HK2 or glucose-6-phosphatase expression from 18F-FDG-positive disease (P = 0.57 and P = 0.44, respectively).
Conclusion: Beyond HK2 expression, 18F-FDG negativity in (mainly pretreated) MM patients seems to be associated with additional causes not yet known.
© 2019 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  11C-methionine; 18F-FDG; PET/CT; glucose-6-phosphatase; multiple myeloma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30389821     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.217539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  7 in total

1.  A proposed index of diffuse bone marrow [18F]-FDG uptake and PET skeletal patterns correlate with myeloma prognostic markers, plasma cell morphology, and response to therapy.

Authors:  A Paschali; E Panagiotidis; T Triantafyllou; V Palaska; K Tsirou; E Verrou; E Υiannaki; D Markala; A Papanikolaou; A Pouli; P Konstantinidou; V Chatzipavlidou; E Terpos; E Katodritou
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-10-25       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: Integrated Clinical and Omics Approach Dissects the Neoplastic Clone and the Tumor Microenvironment.

Authors:  Antonio Giovanni Solimando; Matteo Claudio Da Vià; Sebastiano Cicco; Patrizia Leone; Giuseppe Di Lernia; Donato Giannico; Vanessa Desantis; Maria Antonia Frassanito; Arcangelo Morizio; Julia Delgado Tascon; Assunta Melaccio; Ilaria Saltarella; Giuseppe Ranieri; Roberto Ria; Leo Rasche; K Martin Kortüm; Andreas Beilhack; Vito Racanelli; Angelo Vacca; Hermann Einsele
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 3.  MRI and PET/MRI in hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Marius E Mayerhoefer; Stephen J Archibald; Christina Messiou; Anton Staudenherz; Dominik Berzaczy; Heiko Schöder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in Multiple Myeloma Patients: Minimal Disease With Maximal Implications.

Authors:  Charalampos Charalampous; Taxiarchis Kourelis
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Radiopharmaceuticals in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Christos Sachpekidis; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 6.  Metabolic Volume Measurements in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Maria Emilia Seren Takahashi; Irene Lorand-Metze; Carmino Antonio de Souza; Claudio Tinoco Mesquita; Fernando Amorim Fernandes; José Barreto Campello Carvalheira; Celso Dario Ramos
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2021-12-16

Review 7.  Imaging of treatment response and minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: state of the art WB-MRI and PET/CT.

Authors:  Frederic E Lecouvet; Marie-Christiane Vekemans; Thomas Van Den Berghe; Koenraad Verstraete; Thomas Kirchgesner; Souad Acid; Jacques Malghem; Joris Wuts; Jens Hillengass; Vincent Vandecaveye; François Jamar; Olivier Gheysens; Bruno C Vande Berg
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 2.199

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.