Literature DB >> 30389413

Optimal selection of optimization bolus thickness in planning of VMAT breast radiotherapy treatments.

Maija Rossi1, Eeva Boman2, Mika Kapanen3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to find an optimal optimization skin flash thickness in volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy of the breast in consideration of soft tissue deformations during the treatment course. Ten breast radiotherapy patients with axillary lymph node inclusion were retrospectively planned with volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy technique. The plans were optimized with the planning target volume (PTV) extending outside the skin contour by 0, 5, 7, and 10 mm; and with optimization boluses of 3 or 5 mm on the extended PTV. The final dose was calculated without the bolus. The plans were compared in terms of PTV homogeneity and conformity, and dose minima and maxima. The doses to organs at risk were also evaluated. The doses were recalculated in real patient geometries based on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images captured 3 to 6 times during each patient's treatment course. The optimization to the PTV without the PTV extension resulted in the best CTV coverage in the original plans (V95% = 98.0% ± 1.2%). However, when these plans were studied in real CBCT-based patient geometries, the CTV V95% was compromised (94.6% ± 8.3%). In addition, for the surface (4 mm slap inside the PTV 4 mm below the body contour) dose V95% was reduced from the planned 74.7% ± 7.5% to the recalculated 65.5% ± 11.5%. Optimization with an 8-mm bolus to a PTV with 5-mm extension was the most robust choice to ensure the CTV and surface dose coverage (recalculated V95% was 95.2% ± 6.4% and 74.6% ± 8.4%, respectively). In cases with the largest observed deformations, even a 10-mm PTV extension did not suffice to cover the target. Optimization with a 5-mm PTV extension and an 8-mm optimization bolus improved the surface dose and slightly improved the CTV dose when compared to no extension plans. For deformations over 1 cm, no benefit was seen in PTV extensions and replanning is recommended. Frequent tangential and CBCT imaging should be used during treatment course to detect potential large anatomical changes.
Copyright © 2018 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Optimization bolus; Skin flash; VMAT

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30389413     DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2018.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  3 in total

1.  AlignRT® and Catalyst™ in whole-breast radiotherapy with DIBH: Is IGRT still needed?

Authors:  Marko Laaksomaa; Sebastian Sarudis; Maija Rossi; Turkka Lehtonen; Jani Pehkonen; Jenny Remes; Helmi Luukkanen; Tanja Skyttä; Mika Kapanen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Split-VMAT technique to control the deep inspiration breath hold time for breast cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Sara Poeta; Younes Jourani; Alex De Caluwé; Robbe Van den Begin; Dirk Van Gestel; Nick Reynaert
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Comprehensive nodal breast VMAT: solving the low-dose wash dilemma using an iterative knowledge-based radiotherapy planning solution.

Authors:  Cameron Stanton; Linda J Bell; Andrew Le; Brooke Griffiths; Kenny Wu; Jessica Adams; Leigh Ambrose; Denise Andree-Evarts; Brian Porter; Regina Bromley; Kirsten van Gysen; Marita Morgia; Gillian Lamoury; Thomas Eade; Jeremy T Booth; Susan Carroll
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2021-08-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.