Literature DB >> 30389352

Molecular detection of Mycobacterium leprae by Polymerase Chain Reaction in captive and free-ranging wild animals.

Fernanda H Maruyama1, Thais O Morgado1, Richard C Pacheco1, Luciano Nakazato1, Valeria Dutra2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30389352      PMCID: PMC9427824          DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2018.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis        ISSN: 1413-8670            Impact factor:   3.257


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor: Leprosy, a disease neglected in many countries, is endemic in Brazil. With a wide diversity of fauna distributed in three biomes (Amazon Forest, Cerrado and Pantanal), the state of Mato Grosso (MT) in the Central-West Region has the highest prevalence of human cases: 7.75 per 10,000 inhabitants. Despite the scarcity of data in the literature on wild animals naturally infected with Mycobacterium leprae, the possibility of transmission to humans cannot be ruled out. Armadillos, red squirrels, and non-human primates are important natural reservoirs of M. leprae reported in the literature, becoming possible sources of bacillary dissemination making it difficult to interrupt the leprosy transmission chain. As data on natural infections are scarce, it is difficult to understand the role of wild animals in transmission of the disease. Therefore, we used PCR to detect the genetic material of M. leprae in nasal swabs of wild animals. Nasal swabs were collected from 69 captive and free wild animals from the MT and Pantanal regions of Brazil, independent of clinical signs, and sent to the Laboratory of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, according to “Sistema de Autorização e Informação em Biodiversidade” (SISBIO), an authorization and information system for biodiversity (nos. 40617-1 and 42303). The samples were submitted for extraction of genetic material according to the phenol/chloroform method. PCR was performed according to Woods and Cole. The PCR product was purified using a GFX™ PCR DNA and Gel Band Purification kit (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA) and sequenced using an ABI-PRISM 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Life Technologies Corporation, USA). The sequences were deposited in GenBank and compared using the BLAST program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/Blast.cgi). Of the 69 samples (Table 1), six (8.69%) wild-type free and captive animals tested positive for M. leprae by PCR, including one margay (Leopardus wiedii), two lowland tapirs (Tapirus terrestris), two capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella), and one owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus). The detection in four different species of wild animals shows the ability of this bacillus to be carried in different hosts. In addition, two animals were from the zoo, that could have acquired M. leprae due to close contact to humans or environmental contamination. However, in literature the mechanism of transmission is not yet fully understood.
Table 1

Epidemiological data and M. leprae PCR test of the animals identified in Mato Grosso – Brazil.

IDFree-rangingCitySpeciesScientific namePCR
m962/16YesJangadaJaguarundiPuma yagouaroundiNegative
m1016/16YesMarcelândiaJaguarPanthera oncaNegative
m1102/16NoZooaCougarPuma concolorNegative
m1122/16NoZooCoatiNasua nasuaNegative
m1162/16YesCuiabáGuinea pigCavia porcellusNegative
m1226/16YesBarra do BugresOcelotLeopardus pardalisNegative
m1285/16YesNAbJaguarundiPuma yagouaroundiNegative
m1294/16YesVárzea GrandeCapybaraHydrochoerus hydrochaerisNegative
m1335/16NoZooGiant anteaterMyrmecophaga tridactylaNegative
m1336/16YesRosário OesteGiant anteaterMyrmecophaga tridactylaNegative
m1364/16YesCuiabáCollared anteatersMyrmecophaga tetradactylaNegative
m1485/16YesSanto Antônio do LevergerOtterLontra longicaudisNegative
m1491/16YesNAWhite-eared opossumDidelphis albiventrisNegative
m1529/16NoZooAgoutiDasyprocta AgutiNegative
m1787/17YesNAOwl monkeyAoutus trivirgatusPositive Genbank MF975704
m1790/16YesTangará da SerraGiant anteaterMyrmecophaga tridactylaNegative
m1795/16NoZooCoatiNasua nasuaNegative
m1796/16NoZooAgoutiDasyprocta agutiNegative
m1862/16YesVárzea GrandeCollared anteatersMyrmecophaga tetradactylaNegative
m11/17YesCuiabáCapuchin monkeySapajus apellaPositive Genbank MF975703
m74/17NoZooCougarPuma concolorNegative
m153/17YesCuiabáWhite-eared opossumDidelphis albiventrisNegative
m234/17NoZooCougarPuma concolorNegative
m235/17YesCuiabáSaguiCallithrix sp.Negative
m248/17NoZooManed wolfChrysocyon brachyurusNegative
m261/17YesNABlack owler monkeyAlouatta carayaNegative
m305/17NoZooLowland tapirsTapirus terrestrisPositive Genbank MF975707
m345/17NoZooCougarPuma concolorNegative
m379/17YesNABlack-tufted marmosetCallithrix penicillataNegative
m514/17NoZooWhite-cheeked spider monkeyAteles marginatusNegative
m520/17NoZooWhite-cheeked spider monkeyAteles marginatusNegative
m530/17YesNACapuchin monkeySapajus apellaPositive Genbank MF818035
m539/17YesNAMonkeyNANegative
m542/17YesSanto Antônio do LevergerOwl monkeyAotus sp.Negative
m543/17YesSanto Antônio do LevergerOwl monkeyAotus sp.Negative
m705/17YesCuiabáMonkeyNANegative
m709/17YesPoconéGiant anteaterMyrmecophaga tridactylaNegative
m743/17NoZooCoatiNasua nasuaNegative
m748/17YesPoconéCrab-eating foxCerdocyon thousNegative
m765/17NoZooOcelotLeopardus pardalisNegative
m787/17NoZooMargayLeopardus weidiiPositive Genbank MF975706
m809/17YesRondonópolisLowland tapirsTapirus terrestrisPositive Genbank MF975705
m874/17NoZooCoatiNasua nasuaNegative
m878/17YesCampo VerdeHowler monkeyAlouatta sp.Negative
m879/17NoZooCrab-eating foxCerdocyon thousNegative
m742/17NoZooCoatiNasua nasuaNegative
m721/17NoZooCoatiNasua nasuaNegative
m871/17YesCuiabáOwl monkeyAoutus azareNegative
m897/17NoZooCrab-eating foxCerdocyon thousNegative
m881/17NoZooCrab-eating foxCerdocyon thousNegative
m1055/17YesNACapuchin monkeySapajus apellaNegative
m1070/17YesNACapybaraHydrochoerus hydrochaerisNegative
m1126/17YesTangará da SerraCougarPuma concolorNegative
m1153/17NoZooCrab-eating foxCerdocyon thousNegative
m1247/17YesNACapuchin monkeySapajus apellaNegative
m1248/17YesNACapuchin monkeySapajus apellaNegative
m1249/17YesNACapuchin monkeySapajus apellaNegative
m1267/17YesPoconéCapybaraHydrochoerus hydrochaerisNegative
m1268/17YesPoconéCapybaraHydrochoerus hydrochaerisNegative
m1269/17YesPoconéCapybaraHydrochoerus hydrochaerisNegative
m1270/17YesPoconéCapybaraHydrochoerus hydrochaerisNegative
m1271/17YesPoconéCapybaraHydrochoerus hydrochaerisNegative
m1272/17YesPoconéCapybaraHydrochoerus hydrochaerisNegative
m1290/17YesCuiabáOwl monkeyAoutus nigricepsNegative
m1309/17YesCáceresCougarPuma concolorNegative
m1313/17YesCuiabáCapuchin monkeySapajus apellaNegative
m1327/17YesNABlack owler monkeyAlouatta carayaNegative
m1338/17YesCuiabáCapuchin monkeySapajus apellaNegative
m1339/17YesCuiabáSaguiCallithrix sp.Negative

Federal University of Mato Grosso-Cuiaba.

NA, not available.

Epidemiological data and M. leprae PCR test of the animals identified in Mato Grosso – Brazil. Federal University of Mato Grosso-Cuiaba. NA, not available. Knowledge of the environment surrounding the infected humans or animals, and route of infection and mode of transmission are necessary to understand endemics in certain regions. Truman et al. described that isolates from human and armadillos are identical genetically. Thus, we suggest that the possible contact of animals of this study, which may be possible carriers of the bacillus, with other animals or with humans can disseminate the disease, the bacillus was detected in nasal swabs. Thus, we observe that the detection in wild animals may be associated with high prevalence and endemicity in the state of MT, which makes them important sources of infection. In addition, these data contribute to a better understanding of the epidemiology of leprosy.

Disclaimers

The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
  4 in total

1.  A family of dispersed repeats in Mycobacterium leprae.

Authors:  S A Woods; S T Cole
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.501

2.  Red squirrels in the British Isles are infected with leprosy bacilli.

Authors:  Charlotte Avanzi; Jorge Del-Pozo; Andrej Benjak; Karen Stevenson; Victor R Simpson; Philippe Busso; Joyce McLuckie; Chloé Loiseau; Colin Lawton; Janne Schoening; Darren J Shaw; Jérémie Piton; Lucio Vera-Cabrera; Jesùs S Velarde-Felix; Fergal McDermott; Stephen V Gordon; Stewart T Cole; Anna L Meredith
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Probable zoonotic leprosy in the southern United States.

Authors:  Richard W Truman; Pushpendra Singh; Rahul Sharma; Philippe Busso; Jacques Rougemont; Alberto Paniz-Mondolfi; Adamandia Kapopoulou; Sylvain Brisse; David M Scollard; Thomas P Gillis; Stewart T Cole
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Presence of viable Mycobacterium leprae in environmental specimens around houses of leprosy patients.

Authors:  R P Turankar; M Lavania; M Singh; U Sengupta; Ksr Siva Sai; R S Jadhav
Journal:  Indian J Med Microbiol       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.985

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Reservoirs and transmission routes of leprosy; A systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas Ploemacher; William R Faber; Henk Menke; Victor Rutten; Toine Pieters
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2020-04-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.