Literature DB >> 30389116

Did we prioritize quality improvement in general surgery: Time for a focus on outcomes and enhanced recovery care plans?

Byron D Hughes1, Eric Sieloff2, Hemalkumar B Mehta3, Anthony J Senagore2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2008, 2005-2006 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data were used to identify surgical operations contributing disproportionately to morbidity and mortality. Since then, numerous enhanced recovery programs have been utilized to augment quality improvement efforts. This study reassesses procedural complication incidence after a decade of quality improvement efforts.
METHODS: Data from the 2015 NSQIP were used. The same original 36 general surgery procedure groups were created using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Ninety percent of our 409,230 patients matched into a procedure group and adverse event rates were analyzed for each.
RESULTS: Ten procedure groups accounted for 80% of adverse events. Colectomy ranked the highest for adverse events (34%), readmissions (27%) and mortality rates (45.8%). For outpatient cholecystectomy, the relative percent point difference for adverse events has increased by 224% since 2005.
CONCLUSION: Refocusing on colectomy and outpatient cholecystectomy represent current priorities in general surgery.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERP; General surgery; NSQIP

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30389116      PMCID: PMC6548186          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  1 in total

1.  Colectomy among Fee-for-Service Medicare Enrollees Coded as DRG 330: A Potential Platform to Allow Consumer Cost Transparency?

Authors:  Byron D Hughes; Christian Sommerhalder; E Martin Sieloff; Kari E Williams; Douglas S Tyler; Anthony J Senagore
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.