Literature DB >> 30389054

Physical activity, benefits, and barriers across the aging continuum.

Cha-Nam Shin1, Young-Shin Lee2, Michael Belyea3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A growing body of evidence indicates the importance of physical activity during midlife period linked to the likelihood of healthy aging, while the likelihood of an individual engaging in physical activity depends largely on their perceived benefits and barriers to being physically active. AIM: This study was to examine physical activity levels of midlife Korean American adults and their perceived benefits and barriers to physical activity compared with young and older adults.
METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of data collected for a larger descriptive, cross-sectional study that was conducted with a sample of 517 Korean American adults in a Midwestern city. Data were collected using a survey questionnaire.
RESULTS: A little more than half of the sample were women (57.1%), with a mean age of 41.6 (± 13.4). The study sample met the current guidelines for physical activity far less than the general U.S. population (30.4% -34.6 vs. 51.7%). Less midlife adults met the guidelines for moderate-intensity physical activity than older adults (34.2% vs. 57.4%), while less midlife adults met the guidelines for vigorous-intensity physical activity than young adults (24.8% vs. 40.6%). Midlife adults perceived fewer benefits than did young and older adults.
CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that midlife adults are less likely to engage in physical activity and probably more at risk for unhealthy ageing than young and older adults. Understanding benefits and barriers of target population is the first step in developing culturally and age-appropriate intervention to promote physical activity.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barriers; Benefits; Korean Americans; Midlife; Physical activity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30389054     DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2018.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Nurs Res        ISSN: 0897-1897            Impact factor:   2.257


  5 in total

1.  Age Differences in Recovery Rate Following an Aerobic-Based Exercise Protocol Inducing Muscle Damage Among Amateur, Male Athletes.

Authors:  Irit Markus; Keren Constantini; Nir Goldstein; Roee Amedi; Yael Bornstein; Yael Stolkovsky; Merav Vidal; Shahar Lev-Ari; Roy Balaban; Stav Leibou; Tamar Blumenfeld-Katzir; Noam Ben-Eliezer; David Peled; Yaniv Assaf; Dennis Jensen; Naama Constantini; Gal Dubnov-Raz; Israel Halperin; Yftach Gepner
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Physical Activity Promotion in a Safety-net Clinic: Does the Provider Make a Difference? A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Pamela G Bowen; Opoku-Agyeman William; Affuso Olivia; Paula Levi; Nancy Wingo
Journal:  Transl J Am Coll Sports Med       Date:  2021

Review 3.  Barriers and Facilitators Associated with Physical Activity in the Middle East and North Africa Region: A Systematic Overview.

Authors:  Sonia Chaabane; Karima Chaabna; Sathyanarayanan Doraiswamy; Ravinder Mamtani; Sohaila Cheema
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Motor Coordination and Global Development in Subjects with Down Syndrome: The Influence of Physical Activity.

Authors:  Marianna Alesi; Valerio Giustino; Ambra Gentile; Manuel Gómez-López; Giuseppe Battaglia
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  A 12-Week Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial, Evaluating the Effect of Supplementation with a Spinach Extract on Skeletal Muscle Fitness in Adults Older Than 50 Years of Age.

Authors:  Silvia Pérez-Piñero; Vicente Ávila-Gandía; Jacobo A Rubio Arias; Juan Carlos Muñoz-Carrillo; Pilar Losada-Zafrilla; Francisco Javier López-Román
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 5.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.