| Literature DB >> 30388795 |
Nadezda Stevulova1, Jozef Junak2, Vojtech Vaclavik3.
Abstract
This experimental study was focused on the application of an alternative binder based on MgO, and the variation of its components by the combination of two MgO products obtained by the calcinations of natural magnesite, siliceous materials (river sand and silica fume), and alkaline admixture in the mixture for a preparation of composite based on biomass waste such as hemp hurds as organic filler. This paper presents the results of the effect of an MgO binder composition on the compressive strength of the bio-aggregate-based composites. Other physical properties, such as the bulk density, thermal conductivity coefficient, and water absorption, were also investigated. The measured strength parameters of the bio-composite samples that were hardened for 28 days demonstrate that the binder consisting of optimal calcined MgO and silica fume as a total replacement for sand ensures a good binding of the matrix with hemp hurd compared to other varied compositions of alternative binder. No significant differences in bulk density and thermal conductivity values were found for these composites. However, the bio-composite specimen with an MgO⁻SiO₂ matrix had the highest compressive strength and achieved the lowest value of water absorption. An increase in hardening time of up to 90 days led to a significant improvement of strength as well as reduction in permeability.Entities:
Keywords: alternative binder; bio-aggregate-based composite; compressive strength
Year: 2018 PMID: 30388795 PMCID: PMC6266435 DOI: 10.3390/ma11112153
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Comparison of samples: natural magnesite (a), MgO–L (b) and MgO–C (c) of the mean particle diameter of 1031 μm, 385 μm, and 337 μm.
Chemical composition of MgO products and specific surface area.
| Oxide | Content (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| MgO–C | MgO–L | |
| MgO | 84.0 | 69.1 |
| CaO | 5.5 | 5.2 |
| Fe2O3 | 7.5 | 6.0 |
| SiO2 | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Al2O3 | 0.2 | 0.08 |
| Loss on ignition (%) | 1.7 | 18.5 |
| Specific surface area (m2·g−1) | 47.0 | 88.1 |
Components variation in MgO–binder (RS—river sand; SF—silica fume; A—alkaline admixture).
| Binder Sample | Components Variation in Binder (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MgO–C | MgO–L | RS | SF | A | |
| B0 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 33.3 | ||
| B1 | 50 | 50 | |||
| B2 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 33.3 | ||
| B3 | 50 | 50 | |||
| B4 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 33.3 | ||
| B5 | 50 | 50 | |||
| B6 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 33.3 | ||
| B7 | 50 | 50 | |||
Figure 2Test composite specimen in the device for determination of compressive strength.
Physical characteristics and compressive strength of 28-day hardened bio-composites.
| Binder Sample | Density (kg/m3) | Thermal Conductivity Coefficient (W/m·K) | Shor-Term Water Absorption (%) | Compressive Strength (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B0 | 890 ± 4 | 0.195 ± 0.015 | 22.4 ± 1.05 | 1.55 ± 0.06 |
| B1 | 910 ± 3 | 0.205 ± 0.014 | 19.8 ± 1.24 | 2.84 ± 0.16 |
| B2 | 810 ± 3 | 0.180 ± 0.011 | 19.9 ± 0.97 | 2.40 ± 0.11 |
| B3 | 790 ± 8 | 0.180 ± 0.011 | 16.1 ± 0.83 | 3.32 ± 0.21 |
| B4 | 770 ± 7 | 0.170 ± 0.009 | 20.2 ± 1.06 | 1.75 ± 0.10 |
| B5 | 920 ± 6 | 0.190 ± 0.018 | 15.1 ± 1.12 | 2.94 ± 0.19 |
| B6 | 805 ± 5 | 0.175 ± 0.015 | 20.3 ± 1.02 | 2.76 ± 0.15 |
| B7 | 760 ± 4 | 0.175 ± 0.011 | 15.3 ± 0.74 | 3.51 ± 0.17 |
Development of compressive strength and short-term water absorption of bio-composite with binder composition of B7 in relation to hardening time.
| Hardening Time (Days) | Short-Term Water Absorption (%) | Compressive Strength (MPa) |
|---|---|---|
| 28 | 15.3 ± 0.74 | 3.51 ± 0.17 |
| 60 | 11.1 ± 0.53 | 4.59 ± 0.28 |
| 90 | 8.9 ± 0.41 | 8.12 ± 0.62 |