Literature DB >> 30387889

Pervasive gene conversion in chromosomal inversion heterozygotes.

Katharine L Korunes1, Mohamed A F Noor1.   

Abstract

Chromosomal inversions shape recombination landscapes, and species differing by inversions may exhibit reduced gene flow in these regions of the genome. Though single crossovers within inversions are not usually recovered from inversion heterozygotes, the recombination barrier imposed by inversions is nuanced by noncrossover gene conversion. Here, we provide a genomewide empirical analysis of gene conversion rates both within species and in species hybrids. We estimate that gene conversion occurs at a rate of 1 × 10-5 to 2.5 × 10-5 converted sites per bp per generation in experimental crosses within Drosophila pseudoobscura and between D. pseudoobscura and its naturally hybridizing sister species D. persimilis. This analysis is the first direct empirical assessment of gene conversion rates within inversions of a species hybrid. Our data show that gene conversion rates in interspecies hybrids are at least as high as within-species estimates of gene conversion rates, and gene conversion occurs regularly within and around inverted regions of species hybrids, even near inversion breakpoints. We also found that several gene conversion events appeared to be mitotic rather than meiotic in origin. Finally, we observed that gene conversion rates are higher in regions of lower local sequence divergence, yet our observed gene conversion rates in more divergent inverted regions were at least as high as in less divergent collinear regions. Given our observed high rates of gene conversion despite the sequence differentiation between species, especially in inverted regions, gene conversion has the potential to reduce the efficacy of inversions as barriers to recombination over evolutionary time.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gene conversion; inversions; recombination; speciation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30387889      PMCID: PMC6475484          DOI: 10.1111/mec.14921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  11 in total

1.  Stepwise evolution of a butterfly supergene via duplication and inversion.

Authors:  Kang-Wook Kim; Rishi De-Kayne; Ian J Gordon; Kennedy Saitoti Omufwoko; Dino J Martins; Richard Ffrench-Constant; Simon H Martin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.671

2.  Mutation Load in Sunflower Inversions Is Negatively Correlated with Inversion Heterozygosity.

Authors:  Kaichi Huang; Kate L Ostevik; Cassandra Elphinstone; Marco Todesco; Natalia Bercovich; Gregory L Owens; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 8.800

3.  Adaptive, caste-specific changes to recombination rates in a thelytokous honeybee population.

Authors:  Benjamin P Oldroyd; Boris Yagound; Michael H Allsopp; Michael J Holmes; Gabrielle Buchmann; Amro Zayed; Madeleine Beekman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.530

4.  Consequences of Single-Locus and Tightly Linked Genomic Architectures for Evolutionary Responses to Environmental Change.

Authors:  Rebekah A Oomen; Anna Kuparinen; Jeffrey A Hutchings
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.645

5.  The Genomic Complexity of a Large Inversion in Great Tits.

Authors:  Vinicius H da Silva; Veronika N Laine; Mirte Bosse; Lewis G Spurgin; Martijn F L Derks; Kees van Oers; Bert Dibbits; Jon Slate; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Marcel E Visser; Martien A M Groenen
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 3.416

6.  Deleterious mutation accumulation and the long-term fate of chromosomal inversions.

Authors:  Emma L Berdan; Alexandre Blanckaert; Roger K Butlin; Claudia Bank
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Supergene origin and maintenance in Atlantic cod.

Authors:  Michael Matschiner; Julia Maria Isis Barth; Ole Kristian Tørresen; Bastiaan Star; Helle Tessand Baalsrud; Marine Servane Ono Brieuc; Christophe Pampoulie; Ian Bradbury; Kjetill Sigurd Jakobsen; Sissel Jentoft
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 19.100

8.  Consequences of partially recessive deleterious genetic variation for the evolution of inversions suppressing recombination between sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Colin Olito; Suvi Ponnikas; Bengt Hansson; Jessica K Abbott
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 4.171

9.  Extensive Recombination Suppression and Epistatic Selection Causes Chromosome-Wide Differentiation of a Selfish Sex Chromosome in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Zachary L Fuller; Spencer A Koury; Christopher J Leonard; Randee E Young; Kobe Ikegami; Jonathan Westlake; Stephen Richards; Stephen W Schaeffer; Nitin Phadnis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  How Important Are Structural Variants for Speciation?

Authors:  Linyi Zhang; Radka Reifová; Zuzana Halenková; Zachariah Gompert
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.