Paula Maciel Brandão1, José Antonio Poli de Figueiredo2, Renata Dornelles Morgental3, Roberta Kochenborger Scarparo4, Rafael Chies Hartmann2, Silvana Beltrami Gonçalves Waltrick2, Ronaldo Araújo Souza1. 1. Department of Endodontics, Bahia School of Medicine and Public Health, Avenida Dom João VI, 275, Salvador, BA, 40290-000, Brazil. 2. Clinical Department, School of Dentistry, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Avenida Ipiranga, 6681, Porto Alegre, RS, 90619-900, Brazil. 3. Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria, Rua Marechal Floriano Peixoto, 1184, Santa Maria, RS, 97015-372, Brazil. remorgental@hotmail.com. 4. Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2492, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-004, Brazil.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of foraminal enlargement on the healing of induced apical periodontitis in a rat model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Periapical lesions were bilaterally induced in mandibular first molars of 24 Wistar rats, through root canals exposure to the oral environment during 3 weeks. Endodontic treatment was performed in the mesial canal of right molars, which were separated into two experimental groups (n = 12/group). The foraminal enlargement group (FEG) received instrumentation in the entire root canal length, including the cemental canal, while in the non-foraminal enlargement group (NFEG), instrumentation was carried out 1 mm short of the apical foramen. Root canals were filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer, in the same visit, 1 mm short of the apical foramen in both experimental groups. Left molars were not treated and served as a baseline control group. The animals were killed after 4 weeks, and their hemi-mandibles were prepared for radiographic and histological analysis. Data were analyzed by Student's t test and ANOVA. RESULTS: Only FEG presented lower areas of periapical radiolucency compared to the control (p < .05). Both FEG and NFEG allowed decreased inflammation intensity (p < .0001 and p < .01) and higher scores of cementum neoformation when compared to non-treated samples (p < .0001). FEG was more effective than NFEG in promoting biological seal, i.e., apical closure with cementum (p < .01). FEG, but not NFEG, showed lower scores of root resorption than the control. CONCLUSIONS: Foraminal enlargement during root canal preparation improved periapical healing in rat molars. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Foraminal enlargement has been suggested to improve disinfection at the apical portion of root canals. This procedure may favor the healing of chronic periapical lesions.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of foraminal enlargement on the healing of induced apical periodontitis in a rat model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Periapical lesions were bilaterally induced in mandibular first molars of 24 Wistar rats, through root canals exposure to the oral environment during 3 weeks. Endodontic treatment was performed in the mesial canal of right molars, which were separated into two experimental groups (n = 12/group). The foraminal enlargement group (FEG) received instrumentation in the entire root canal length, including the cemental canal, while in the non-foraminal enlargement group (NFEG), instrumentation was carried out 1 mm short of the apical foramen. Root canals were filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer, in the same visit, 1 mm short of the apical foramen in both experimental groups. Left molars were not treated and served as a baseline control group. The animals were killed after 4 weeks, and their hemi-mandibles were prepared for radiographic and histological analysis. Data were analyzed by Student's t test and ANOVA. RESULTS: Only FEG presented lower areas of periapical radiolucency compared to the control (p < .05). Both FEG and NFEG allowed decreased inflammation intensity (p < .0001 and p < .01) and higher scores of cementum neoformation when compared to non-treated samples (p < .0001). FEG was more effective than NFEG in promoting biological seal, i.e., apical closure with cementum (p < .01). FEG, but not NFEG, showed lower scores of root resorption than the control. CONCLUSIONS: Foraminal enlargement during root canal preparation improved periapical healing in rat molars. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Foraminal enlargement has been suggested to improve disinfection at the apical portion of root canals. This procedure may favor the healing of chronic periapical lesions.