Literature DB >> 30386710

Development, characterization, and transferability of SSR markers for Vriesea carinata (Bromeliaceae) based on RNA sequencing.

Cristina C Todeschini1, José L B Parizotto1, Frank Guzman2, Camila M Zanella1,3, Rogério Margis1,2,4, Márcia Goetze1, Gecele M Paggi5, Laís M Santana Costa1, Camila de Aguiar Melo1, Luiza D Hirsch1, Fernanda Bered1.   

Abstract

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Expressed sequence tag-simple sequence repeat (EST-SSR) markers were isolated for Vriesea carinata, an endemic bromeliad from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. These SSR loci may be used to investigate the genetic diversity and population structure of this species and related bromeliads. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Based on the transcriptome data of V. carinata, 30 primer pairs were designed and selected for initial validation. Of these primer pairs, 16 generated suitable SSR loci in 69 individuals. The number of alleles per locus ranged from one to 13; the levels of observed and expected heterozygosity per locus ranged from 0.000 to 1.000 and from 0.000 to 0.935, respectively. All loci produced heterologous amplification. Transferability of the loci was tested in 15 species belonging to three Bromeliaceae subfamilies.
CONCLUSIONS: The developed EST-SSR markers revealed polymorphism in the four studied populations and could be useful to investigate the genetic diversity of V. carinata and related species. The markers may also be suitable for novel gene annotation and discovery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aechmea; Alcantarea; Bromelia; Bromeliaceae; Dyckia; Neoregelia; RNA‐Seq; Vriesea carinata; microsatellite markers

Year:  2018        PMID: 30386710      PMCID: PMC6201730          DOI: 10.1002/aps3.1184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Plant Sci        ISSN: 2168-0450            Impact factor:   1.936


Bromeliaceae is a Neotropical angiosperm family comprising approximately 58 genera and 3352 species distributed in eight subfamilies (Luther, 2012). Vriesea Lindl. is part of the monophyletic Tillandsioideae subfamily and is the third largest genus endemic to Brazil, with the Atlantic Forest being its primary center of diversity (Barfuss et al., 2016). Vriesea carinata Wawra is an epiphyte or terrestrial species that exists in mesophilic environments and well‐preserved habitats with high humidity distributed along the Atlantic Forest. This species is pollinated by hummingbirds and often used as an ornamental plant, which causes them to be illegally extracted. The increased extractivism of this species, linked to the fragmentation of the Atlantic Forest, has caused concern with respect to the conservation of V. carinata, as well as many other bromeliad species (Zanella et al., 2012). To date, slightly more than a dozen studies have characterized simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci in Bromeliaceae. Of these studies, only three have investigated the subfamily Tillandsioideae (Boneh et al., 2003; Palma‐Silva et al., 2007; Neri et al., 2015), and no loci have been tested for cross‐amplification in V. carinata. Considering the high rate of transferability of SSR loci within the same subfamily in Bromeliaceae (Zanella et al., 2012; Goetze et al., 2013; Neri et al., 2015), the development of SSRs in Tillandsioideae may provide markers that can be used in a range of species and that will be valuable tools in the study of species delineation, phylogeography, variation in mating systems, and the detection of hybridization and introgression (Zanella et al., 2012). In this report, we describe the development of 16 expressed sequence tag (EST)–SSR markers for V. carinata using next‐generation transcriptome sequencing. Additionally, we tested the transferability of these markers to other bromeliad species.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Total RNA was isolated from V. carinata leaves as described by Guzman et al. (2013). RNA quality was then assessed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and quantified by the Thermo Scientific NanoDrop Lite Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, Delaware, USA). Subsequently, an RNA‐Seq library was sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA) by Fasteris (Geneva, Switzerland) and assembled de novo in transcripts using the CLC Genome Workbench version 4.0.2 (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) as reported by Guzman et al. (2013). All sequence information was deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA; PRJNA167588). From this library, a preliminary analysis of the presence of microsatellites and the determination of the functions of each fragment was undertaken using the Blast2GO tool (Conesa et al., 2005), which generated a draft of potential sequences for the isolation of microsatellites. Preliminary sequences were analyzed, and the primers encompassing the microsatellite regions were designed using Primer3 software (Koressaar and Remm, 2007). Forward primers were synthesized with a 19‐bp M13 tail (5′‐CACGACGTTGTAAAACGAC‐3′) at the 5′ end to enable labeling with a tailed fluorescent dye (FAM, NED, VIC, or PET) during amplification and multiplex genotyping procedures. To test the isolated SSR loci, fresh leaves were collected from 69 individuals from four natural populations of V. carinata (Appendix 1) and stored in silica gel. Total genomic DNA was extracted according to Doyle and Doyle (1990). The PCR reactions were performed in a final volume of 10 μL, containing 10 ng of genomic DNA, 1× enzyme buffer, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 10 μM of each primer (forward and reverse), and 0.5 unit of Taq polymerase (GoTaq; Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). The amplification protocol was performed according to Palma‐Silva et al. (2007), with the exception of loci Vcar_31 and Vcar_36. The PCR reaction for these loci was performed with an initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 60°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s; and a final extension of 72°C for 10 min. PCR was repeated for loci with positive amplification by adding the universal M13 primer labeled with different fluorochromes (FAM, VIC, PET, or NED) according to Goetze et al. (2013). The amplification products were genotyped in an ABI 3500 DNA Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA) and compared to GeneScan 500 LIZ Size Standard, with allele identification performed in GeneMarker software Demo version 1.97 (SoftGenetics, State College, Pennsylvania, USA). To describe the variation of the microsatellites, observed and expected heterozygosities were estimated for each locus and population using the software MSA (Dieringer and Schlötterer, 2003). FSTAT (Goudet, 1995) was used to estimate the number of alleles, and GENEPOP ON THE WEB (Raymond and Rousset, 1995) was used to test for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium and linkage disequilibrium and to estimate the inbreeding coefficient (F IS). Based on the transcriptome data of V. carinata, 30 primer pairs were designed and tested, of which 16 yielded suitable SSR loci in 69 individuals among the four studied populations (Tables 1, 2). The number of alleles encountered ranged from one to 13 in the four populations evaluated (Table 2). Levels of observed and expected heterozygosity varied from 0.000 to 1.000 and from 0.000 to 0.935, respectively (Table 2). Four loci showed significant deviation of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in at least one of the analyzed populations (P < 0.001) (Table 2). Significant linkage disequilibrium was detected only between Vcar_31 and Vcar_93 and between Vcar_91 and Vcar_293. Linkage disequilibrium could not be tested by Fisher's test in Vcar_501 and Vcar_395 and in three pairs of loci with Vcar_139 (Vcar_31, Vcar_93, and Vcar_258). The 16 SSRs were tested in other bromeliads in order to verify their potential for heterologous amplification. Of the 16 characterized loci, seven amplified in more than 50% of the species (Table 3). The locus Vcar_36 amplified in all species followed by Vcar_501 (14), Vcar_153 (13), Vcar_258 (9), and Vcar_115/Vcar_143/Vcar_395, with each amplifying in eight species. All 16 loci amplified in V. reitzii Leme & A. F. Costa, and approximately 81% amplified in all five individuals tested (Table 4). These loci also amplified in some species belonging to subfamilies other than Tillandsioideae, which suggests their potential utility in genetic studies of populations involving other bromeliad subfamilies.
Table 1

Characteristics of the 16 microsatellite markers developed for Vriesea carinata

Locusa Primer sequences (5′–3′)Repeat motifAllele size range (bp)Putative function [Organism] E‐valueGenBank accession no.
Vcar_10F: AACTTGTCTATGTCTAAAGGAATGG(TTG)5N(GTT)9N(TAT)7 243–261Endoribonuclease Dicer homolog 1 isoform X1 [Ananas comosus]0.0 MF563945
R: ACTCTGCGGCTGTTCTTCTC
Vcar_31F: CCGTAGGCGACGATAGAGAG(AG)15 206–236E3 SUMO‐protein ligase SIZ1 [Ananas comosus]0.0 MF563947
R: GTGGGGGAGGAGAGAGAAAG
Vcar_36F: CCGAAGTCTCTCCCTTTTCC(CGC)7 262–265Flowering time control protein FPA [Ananas comosus]0.0 MH319796
R: TCATTCGACTGCTTCTGCTG
Vcar_72F: TTCTCAATCTTCACCGACGA(CGC)7N(GTCCTC)3N(TCC)6 228–237Histone acetyltransferase GCN5 [Ananas comosus]0.0 MF563948
R: GCGAGGAGGACGATGACTC
Vcar_91F: CGACCCACTCTTCGCTAGTC(ACG)10 186–213Adagio‐like protein 3 [Ananas comosus]0.0 MF563949
R: ATGCGGGAGTCCTCCTTACT
Vcar_93F: TTGCCACAAAGACGTACCAA(AG)8 229–259Coronatine‐insensitive protein homolog 1b‐like [Ananas comosus]0.0 MF563950
R: TGCTGGGAAGAGGTCAGACT
Vcar_95.1F: CATTGGTGTTGTTGGGTTCA(TGCCAC)4N(CTT)6 200–224Calmodulin‐like [Gossypium raimondii]1e‐97 MF563951
R: GAGATGGCTGAGGAAGATGC
Vcar_115F: CGCCATTATCAACGATCACA(GA)8N(AG)7 200–222Leucine‐rich repeat receptor‐like serine/threonine/tyrosine‐protein kinase [Ananas comosus]6e‐171 MF563952
R: GGCGCTTATTTATGCTCTGC
Vcar_139F: CCCCGAAATTGATCGAAAC(AGG)6N(TGG)9N(GA)8 246–264Homogentisate phytyltransferase 2, chloroplastic isoform X1 [Ananas comosus]0.0 MF563953
R: GGTGAGTGAGATTGGGTGGT
Vcar_143F: CCCTTCCCGATCGAATTTAT(CTC)9N(TAGGGT)2 240–264Probable serine/threonine‐protein kinase WNK4 [Elaeis guineensis]4e‐86 MF563954
R: AGGAGCTCCGATCCATAACC
Vcar_153F: TGGATGTGAAGGAGCAGAAA(GCTGAA)2N(GCT)8N(CCTGCT)2 222–234Copper transport protein ATX1 [Phalaenopsis equestris]7e‐18 MF563955
R: ATGCAACAATCATGCAGTGG
Vcar_258F: TTCTTCGAGAGCTTCGATCC(CCT)9 228–237Monothiol glutaredoxin‐S14, chloroplastic [Ananas comosus]4e‐96 MF563956
R: GAGTCAATGCGGAGAAGCAT
Vcar_280.1F: CACAAAGCCACTCACAAAACC(CT)8N(TC)7 220–248Basic blue protein‐like isoform X1 [Ananas comosus]4e‐78 MF563957
R: ACTGCCAATCCGGTATGAAG
Vcar_293F: TTCGGGAGCTCTAGGGTTTT(CCT)9 244–260DNA mismatch repair protein PMS1 isoform X3 [Ananas comosus]2e‐142 MH319797
R: CACCAACTCCTTCACAGCAG
Vcar_395F: CGTATCTCCTCGTCGCTCTC(TTC)12 224Transcription factor HY5‐like [Ananas comosus]2e‐91 MH319798
R: CTGATCAGCTCCCCTTCC
Vcar_501F: GATTCATGCGCGAGATTGTA(AGAA)6 130MADS‐box protein JOINTLESS‐like [Ananas comosus]3e‐30 MH319799
R: ACGGTGGTAGCTCCAATACG

All loci except Vcar_31 and Vcar_36 were amplified using a touchdown program with a temperature range between 58°C and 48°C (Palma‐Silva et al., 2007).

Table 2

Characterization of the 16 microsatellite loci in four populations of Vriesea carinata.a

LociMorretes (n = 21)Santa Virgínia (n = 24)Bertioga (n = 11)Ubatuba (n = 13)
A H o H e F IS A H o H e F IS A H o H e F IS A H o H e F IS
Vcar_1070.7620.8110.06220.0000.6671.00070.6360.7920.20471.0000.837−0.210
Vcar_3190.4440.8690.504b 130.6670.9270.28770.5000.8370.41640.2000.7780.765
Vcar_3620.1900.176−0.08120.0430.0430NTNTNTNTNTNTNTNT
Vcar_7240.2630.6330.591b 40.1250.6420.816b 30.3000.6520.55440.3630.6360.441
Vcar_9150.1760.4510.61620.0620.062010.0000.00030.6000.6110.018
Vcar_93120.8090.8830.085120.5450.9350.429110.9090.9090.000110.8330.9130.091
Vcar_95.170.6670.7560.12131.0000.733−0.50050.4540.6790.34250.7270.7490.030
Vcar_11570.5500.6080.09750.3530.6840.49230.3640.5540.35580.4440.7450.418
Vcar_13950.3750.8420.571b 10.0000.00040.0000.8001.00050.5000.7680.359
Vcar_14360.4280.4490.04830.4000.5420.27360.8330.717−0.170
Vcar_15350.3330.5610.41230.3500.5090.31840.4540.7620.41520.3080.4430.314
Vcar_25830.5710.6480.12220.0000.6671.00030.4280.6590.36830.5000.7500.368
Vcar_280.190.0670.8110.920b 30.0000.8001.00040.0000.7471.000b 90.5000.9080.467
Vcar_29330.4500.6190.27850.5000.8330.423NTNTNTNTNTNTNTNT
Vcar_39510.0000.00010.0000.000NTNTNTNTNTNTNTNT
Vcar_50110.0000.000NTNTNTNTNTNTNTNT
Mean5.3750.3800.5700.3104.1430.2600.5360.5264.5830.3700.6610.4485.5830.5670.7380.241

— = index could not be calculated; A = number of alleles; F IS = inbreeding coefficient; H e = expected heterozygosity; H o = observed heterozygosity; N = number of plants sampled; NT = locus not tested for the population (due to problems with the DNA of some individuals, the last isolated loci could not be tested in these populations).

Locality and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1.

Inbreeding coefficient (F IS) departed significantly from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P < 0.001).

Table 3

Heterologous amplification of the 16 isolated loci of Vriesea carinata in 15 species of the subfamilies Bromelioideae, Pitcairnioideae, and Tillandsioideae of Bromeliaceae.a

LocusBromelioideaePitcairnioideaeTillandsioideaeTotal
Aechmea calyculata Aechmea caudata Aechmea comata Aechmea kertesziae Bromelia antiacantha Neoregelia laevis Dyckia divaricata Dyckia excelsa Dyckia grandidentata Dyckia leptostachya Dyckia pottiorum Alcantarea extensa Vriesea altodaserrae Vriesea philippocoburgii Vriesea reitzii b
Vcar_10www/+3
Vcar_31++++4
Vcar_36++++++ww++ww+++15
Vcar_72+1
Vcar_91ww+w+w/+6
Vcar_93wwww—/w5
Vcar_95.1+++3
Vcar_115wwww++++8
Vcar_139wwww/+4
Vcar_143www++++w/+8
Vcar_153+w++++w++++++13
Vcar_258ww+w++w+w/+9
Vcar_280.1+1
Vcar_293ww+3
Vcar_395www++w+w/+/—8
Vcar_501+++++++++++++w/+/—14

+ = successful amplification; — = unsuccessful amplification; w = weak amplification.

Locality and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1.

Because five individuals were tested in Vriesea reitzii, there is variation in the results (see Table 4).

Table 4

Heterologous amplification of the 16 isolated loci of Vriesea carinata in five individuals of V. reitzii

Loci Vriesea reitzii 1 Vriesea reitzii 2 Vriesea reitzii 3 Vriesea reitzii 4 Vriesea reitzii 5Range in V. reitzii (bp)a
Vcar_10www++250–274
Vcar_31+++++220–230
Vcar_36+++++262–265
Vcar_72+++++228–251
Vcar_91ww++w240–249
Vcar_93wwww246–251
Vcar_95.1+++++239–250
Vcar_115+++++200–220
Vcar_139++w++252–255
Vcar_143w++++249–255
Vcar_153+++++234–240
Vcar_258w+w++231–237
Vcar_280.1+++++220–226
Vcar_293+++++256–260
Vcar_395w++350
Vcar_501++ww350–400

+ = successful amplification; — = unsuccessful amplification; w = weak amplification.

Respective size ranges. Cross‐amplification tests were performed using 2% agarose gel and a 50‐bp ladder.

Characteristics of the 16 microsatellite markers developed for Vriesea carinata All loci except Vcar_31 and Vcar_36 were amplified using a touchdown program with a temperature range between 58°C and 48°C (Palma‐Silva et al., 2007). Characterization of the 16 microsatellite loci in four populations of Vriesea carinata.a — = index could not be calculated; A = number of alleles; F IS = inbreeding coefficient; H e = expected heterozygosity; H o = observed heterozygosity; N = number of plants sampled; NT = locus not tested for the population (due to problems with the DNA of some individuals, the last isolated loci could not be tested in these populations). Locality and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1. Inbreeding coefficient (F IS) departed significantly from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P < 0.001). Heterologous amplification of the 16 isolated loci of Vriesea carinata in 15 species of the subfamilies Bromelioideae, Pitcairnioideae, and Tillandsioideae of Bromeliaceae.a + = successful amplification; — = unsuccessful amplification; w = weak amplification. Locality and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1. Because five individuals were tested in Vriesea reitzii, there is variation in the results (see Table 4). Heterologous amplification of the 16 isolated loci of Vriesea carinata in five individuals of V. reitzii + = successful amplification; — = unsuccessful amplification; w = weak amplification. Respective size ranges. Cross‐amplification tests were performed using 2% agarose gel and a 50‐bp ladder. All markers were tested for their transferability in one individual of 15 species belonging to three Bromeliaceae subfamilies. The conditions of the PCR amplifications were the same as described above. The amplification products were run on 2.0% agarose gel electrophoresis, stained with GelRed (Biotium, Hayward, California, USA), and compared to 100‐bp and 50‐bp ladders (Ludwig Biotechnology Ltda., Alvorada, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil). The loci were considered to have positive amplification when at least one band of the expected size was visualized. Additionally, cross‐amplification was tested in five individuals of V. reitzii to assess potential individual variation. Voucher information concerning the species investigated is listed in Appendix 1.

CONCLUSIONS

The 16 SSR markers described in this study revealed polymorphism in the studied populations of V. carinata and can be useful for the study of genetic diversity and evolution in other related species. Additionally, the loci described in this study may be used in studies that promote conservation and management of V. carinata, which is increasingly threatened by extractivism and habitat destruction. Moreover, due to association with coding sequences, the EST‐SSRs isolated in this study have the potential for direct gene tagging and can facilitate future functional genomic studies in V. carinata.

DATA ACCESSIBILITY

All sequence information was uploaded to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (accession no. PRJNA167588); primer sequences were uploaded to GenBank, and accession numbers are provided in Table 1.
SpeciesLocality N Geographic coordinatesVoucher no.a
Aechmea calyculata (E. Morren) BakerEight Waterfalls Park, São Francisco de Paula, RS, Brazil129°26′S, 50°33′WICN 165253
Aechmea caudata Lindm.Florianópolis, SC, Brazil127°26′S, 48°24′WICN 187561
Aechmea comata (Gaudich.) BakerFlorianópolis, SC, Brazil126°26′S, 48°31′WICN 184897
Aechmea kertesziae ReitzLaguna, SC, Brazil128°30′S, 48°45′WICN 167498
Alcantarea extensa (L. B. Sm.) J. R. GrantBiological Station of Santa Lúcia, Santa Tereza, ES, Brazil140°53′S, 19°97′WMBML 25417
Bromelia antiacantha Bertol.Mafra, SC, Brazil126°06′S, 59°19′WHBR 4067
Neoregelia laevis (Mez) L. B. Sm.Graciosa highway, Morretes, PR, Brazil125°47′S, 48°83′WICN 190907
Dyckia divaricata Leme & BünekerAntônio João, MS, Brazil122°07′S, 56°05′WICN 187138
Dyckia excelsa LemeBodoquena, MS, Brazil120°47′S, 56°37′WICN 187137
Dyckia grandidentata P. J. Braun & EstevesSão Gabriel do Oeste, MS, Brazil119°18′S, 54°48′WICN 187129
Dyckia leptostachya BakerPorto Alegre, RS, Brazil130°07′S, 51°14′WICN 187141
Dyckia pottiorum LemeCorguinho, MS, Brazil119°43′S, 54°54′WICN 187134
Vriesea altodaserrae L. B. Sm.Rio Manso, Joinville, SC, Brazil126°28′S, 49°14′WFURB01147
Vriesea carinata WawraBertioga, SP, Brazil1123°51′S, 46°08′WICN 177670
Graciosa Mountain, Morretes, PR, Brazil2125°28′S, 48°50′WICN 177669
Ubatuba, SP, Brazil1323°26′S, 45°50′WRB00265965
Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar, Núcleo Santa Virgínia, São Luiz do Paraitinga, SP, Brazil2423°20′S, 45°09′WESA083165
Vriesea philippocoburgii WawraMorretes, PR, Brazil125°28′S, 48°50′WMBM33325
Vriesea reitzii Leme & CostaSão Francisco de Paula, RS, Brazil529°44′S, 50°58′WICN 190912

ES = Espírito Santo; MS = Mato Grosso do Sul; N = number of individuals sampled; PR = Paraná; RS = Rio Grande do Sul; SC = Santa Catarina; SP = São Paulo.

Herbarium acronyms are per Index Herbariorum (Thiers, 2018).

  4 in total

1.  Enhancements and modifications of primer design program Primer3.

Authors:  Triinu Koressaar; Maido Remm
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Identification of potential miRNAs and their targets in Vriesea carinata (Poales, Bromeliaceae).

Authors:  Frank Guzman; Mauricio Pereira Almerão; Ana Paula Korbes; Ana Paula Christoff; Camila Martini Zanella; Fernanda Bered; Rogério Margis
Journal:  Plant Sci       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 4.729

3.  Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research.

Authors:  Ana Conesa; Stefan Götz; Juan Miguel García-Gómez; Javier Terol; Manuel Talón; Montserrat Robles
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Genetics, evolution and conservation of Bromeliaceae.

Authors:  Camila M Zanella; Aline Janke; Clarisse Palma-Silva; Eliane Kaltchuk-Santos; Felipe G Pinheiro; Gecele M Paggi; Luis E S Soares; Márcia Goetze; Miriam V Büttow; Fernanda Bered
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 1.771

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Development and application of EST-SSRs markers for analysis of genetic diversity in erect milkvetch (Astragalus adsurgens Pall.).

Authors:  Wenlong Gong; Lin Ma; Pan Gong; Xiqiang Liu; Zan Wang; Guiqin Zhao
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 2.316

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.