| Literature DB >> 30386445 |
Mahdiye Bayat1,2, Alireza Khabiri2, Behzad Hemati1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The conventional methods for diagnosis of Vibrio cholerae are time consuming, complicated, and expensive. Development of rapid detection tests is critical for prevention and management of cholera. This study aimed to introduce two sensitive sandwich ELISAs based on avian antibodies (IgY) targeting outer membrane protein W (OmpW) and cytotoxin B (CtxB) antigens of V. cholerae.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30386445 PMCID: PMC6189684 DOI: 10.1155/2018/4032531
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol ISSN: 1712-9532 Impact factor: 2.471
Bacterial strains used to evaluate the specificity of α-OmpW ELISA.
| Strain | Number |
|---|---|
|
| PTCC: 1797 |
|
| MCI: 1096 |
|
| PTCC: 1154 |
|
| MCI:1011 |
|
| PTCC: 1221 |
|
| PTCC: 1237 |
|
| PTCC: 1395 |
|
| PTCC: 1269 |
|
| PTCC: 1402 |
|
| PTCC: 1643 |
|
| PTCC: 1776 |
|
| PTCC: 1310 |
|
| PTCC: 1709 |
|
| PTCC: 1188 |
|
| PTCC: 1151 |
|
| PTCC: 1399 |
The primer sets used for amplification of ompW and ctxB genes.
|
| Forward: |
| Reverse: | |
|
| |
|
| Forward: |
| Reverse: | |
Underlined nucleotides are the restriction sites of BamHI and XhoI.
Figure 1Binding capability evaluation of α-OmpW and α-CtxB antibodies. (a) Strip 1: protein size marker; Strip 2: purified IgY from control group chicken showed no band with recombinant OmpW; and Strip 3: the band of 27 kDa recombinant OmpW reacted with α-OmpW antibodies. (b) Strip 1: protein size marker; Strip 2: purified IgY from control group chicken showed no band with recombinant CtxB; and Strip 3: the band of 17 kDa recombinant CtxB reacted with α-CtxB antibodies.
Figure 2Changes in the specific IgY levels in the egg yolk after the last immunization in immunized and control groups.
Figure 3Optimization of α-OmpW and α-CtxB ELISAs. (a) Coating concentration of α-OmpW and (b) HRP-labeled α-OmpW dilutions. (c) Coating concentration of α-CtxB and (d) biotin-α-CtxB dilutions.
The result of analytical sensitivity calculation for newly developed ELISAs.
| ELISA | Mean OD of blanks | SD of blanks | LOB | Absorbance of LoD | Line equation | LoD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.110 | 0.087 | 0.254 | 0.373 |
| 933 cfu·mL−1 |
|
| 0.087 | 0.022 | 0.123 | 0.153 |
| 33 pg·mL−1 |
The result of analytical sensitivity and specificity of the developed ELISAs in spiked stool sample.
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spiked conc. (Cfu·mL−1) | Final conc. | OD | Spiked conc. (pg·mL−1) | Final conc. | OD |
| 7.5 × 107 | 3.8 × 107 | 2.86 | 500 | 250 | 1.73 |
| 7.5 × 106 | 3.8 × 106 | 1.92 | 250 | 125 | 1.02 |
| 7.5 × 105 | 3.8 × 105 | 1.25 | 125 | 62.5 | 0.45 |
| 7.5 × 104 | 3.8 × 104 | 0.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 31.3 | 15.6 | 0.14 |
| 7.5 × 102 | 3.8 × 102 | 0.18 | 15.6 | 7.8 | 0.08 |
| 7.5 × 101 | 3.8 × 101 | 0.07 | 7.8 | 3.9 | 0.06 |
| 0 (negative control) | 0 | 0.08 | 0 (negative control) | 0 | 0.06 |
Final concentration is calculated by considering the dilution factor used for preparation of cleared sample.