| Literature DB >> 30386426 |
Tiago de Assis1, Shixin Huang2, Carlos Eduardo Driemeier3, Bryon S Donohoe4, Chaehoon Kim1, Seong H Kim2, Ronalds Gonzalez1, Hasan Jameel1, Sunkyu Park1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mechanical refining is a low-capital and well-established technology used in pulp and paper industry to improve fiber bonding for product strength. Refining can also be applied in a biorefinery context to overcome the recalcitrance of pretreated biomass by opening up the biomass structure and modifying substrate properties (e.g., morphology, particle size, porosity, crystallinity), which increases enzyme accessibility to substrate and improves carbohydrate conversion. Although several characterization methods have been used to identify the changes in substrate properties, there is no systematic approach to evaluate the extent of fiber cell wall disruption and what physical properties can explain the improvement in enzymatic digestibility when pretreated lignocellulosic biomass is mechanically refined. This is because the fiber cell wall is complex across multiple scales, including the molecular scale, nano- and meso-scale (microfibril), and microscale (tissue level). A combination of advanced characterization tools is used in this study to better understand the effect of mechanical refining on the meso-scale microfibril assembly and the relationship between those meso-scale modifications and enzymatic hydrolysis.Entities:
Keywords: Autohydrolysis pretreatment; Cellulose crystallinity; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Fiber internal delamination; Fiber morphology; Fiber porosity; Mechanical refining; Sugarcane bagasse
Year: 2018 PMID: 30386426 PMCID: PMC6201573 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-018-1289-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1Carbohydrate conversion of unrefined and refined pretreated sugarcane bagasse samples after PFI and disc refining at different intensity levels after 24, 48, 72 and 96 h of enzymatic hydrolysis. Results are the average of duplicates
Fig. 2Mean fiber length-weighted length, mean fiber width and mean particle size of unrefined and refined pretreated sugarcane bagasse after PFI and disc refining at different intensity levels using fiber quality analyzer (FQA) and light scattering. a The mean fiber length-weighted length obtained from FQA. b The mean fiber width obtained from FQA. c The mean particle size obtained from light scattering. Results are the average of triplicates
Fig. 3Water retention value (WRV) and thermoporometry profiles of unrefined and refined pretreated sugarcane bagasse after PFI and disc refining at different intensity levels. a The water retention value. b The cumulative distribution of freezing bound water as a function of pore diameter on a log scale with base of 10. c The porosity indexes in two different ranges of pore diameter derived from the freezing bound water (FBW) profile: FBW in pores < 4 nm and pore area associated with pores > 10 nm. Curves and results are the average of triplicates
Fig. 4X-ray diffractograms (XRD) and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra for unrefined and refined pretreated sugarcane bagasse after PFI and disc refining at different intensity levels. a The normalized XRD and calculated crystallinity index. b The normalized solid-state NMR spectra. XRD and NMR results are based on a single measurement
Fig. 5Sum frequency generation (SFG) spectra for unrefined and refined pretreated sugarcane bagasse after PFI and disc refining at different intensity levels. a, b The normalized SFG spectra for PFI- and disc-refined samples, respectively. c SFG CH/OH peak area ratio calculated from normalized SFG spectra. SFG results are the average of triplicates
Fig. 6Morphology of unrefined and refined pretreated sugarcane bagasse after PFI and disc refining at different intensity levels using stereoscope microscopy (a–e, insets), confocal scanning laser microscopy (CSLM) (a–e) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (f–j)