| Literature DB >> 30386359 |
Jennifer Mesa-Marín1, Néstor Fernández Del-Saz2,3, Ignacio D Rodríguez-Llorente4, Susana Redondo-Gómez1, Eloísa Pajuelo4, Miquel Ribas-Carbó2, Enrique Mateos-Naranjo1.
Abstract
The present study aims to unravel ecophysiological mechanisms underlying plant-microbe interactions under natural abiotic stress conditions, specifically heavy metal pollution. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) bioaugmentation on Spartina maritima in vivo root respiration and oxidative stress was investigated. This autochthonous plant is a heavy metal hyperaccumulator cordgrass growing in one of the most polluted estuaries in the world. The association with native PGPR is being studied with a view to their biotechnological potential in environmental decontamination. As a novelty, the oxygen-isotope fractionation technique was used to study the in vivo activities of cytochrome oxidase (COX) and alternative oxidase (AOX) pathways. Inoculated plants showed decreased antioxidant enzymatic activities and in vivo root respiration rates. The reduction in respiratory carbon consumption and the stress alleviation may explain the increments observed in S. maritima root biomass and metal rhizoaccumulation after inoculation. For the first time, plant carbon balance and PGPR are interrelated to explain the effect of rhizobacteria under abiotic stress.Entities:
Keywords: Spartina maritima; bioremediation; carbon balance; heavy metals; oxidative stress; oxygen-isotope fractionation; plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR); root respiration
Year: 2018 PMID: 30386359 PMCID: PMC6199767 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01500
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Concentration of arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn) and physicochemical properties of sediments from Tinto marshes.
| Metal concentration (mg Kg-1) | ||||||||||||
| As | Cd | Cu | Ni | Pb | Zn | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tinto sediments | 524 ± 31 | 4.6 ± 0.4 | 2968 ± 211 | 34.3 ± 1.5 | 610 ± 38 | 2576 ± 192 | ||||||
| Nature park soil2 | >100 | >15 | >500 | >500 | >1000 | >1000 | ||||||
| Agricultural soil2 | >50 | >7 | >300 | >200 | >350 | >600 | ||||||
| 71/19/10 | 6.3 ± 0.2 | 195 ± 12 | 12.6 ± 0.5 | 11.5 ± 0.6 | ||||||||