| Literature DB >> 30385775 |
Cheng He1,2, Si-Yuan Yu3,4, Hao Ge3, Huaiqiang Wang5, Yuan Tian3, Haijun Zhang4,5, Xiao-Chen Sun3, Y B Chen5, Jian Zhou3, Ming-Hui Lu6,7, Yan-Feng Chen8,9.
Abstract
Topological valley states at the domain wall between two artificial crystals with opposite valley Chern numbers offer a feasible way to realize robust wave transport since only broken spatial symmetry is required. In addition to the valley, spin and crystal dimension are two other important degrees of freedom, particularly in realizing spin-related topological phenomena. Here we experimentally demonstrate that it is possible to construct two-dimensional acoustic topological pseudospin-valley coupled saddle surface states, designed from glide symmetry in a three-dimensional system. By taking advantage of such two-dimensional surface states, a full set of acoustic pseudospins can be realized, exhibiting pseudospin-valley dependent transport. Furthermore, due to the hyperbolic character of the dispersion of saddle surface states, multi-directional anisotropic controllable robust sound transport with little backscattering is observed. Our findings may open research frontiers for acoustic pseudospins and provide a satisfactory platform for exploring unique acoustic topological properties in three-dimensional structures.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30385775 PMCID: PMC6212403 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07030-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Band structure evolution. a Schematic of the crystal structure formed by stacked double-layer honeycomb lattices. Red and green colours represent two types of atoms. b The acoustic atom is constructed using a triangular prism cavity with tubes. Different atoms have different side lengths. c The schematic for one-half of the first Brillouin zone. d The band structures with identical acoustic atoms l = l = 0.7a (one-layer primary unit cell). e The case of a double-sized unit cell. f The band structures with two different acoustic atoms (l = 0.6a and l = 0.8a) possessing glide symmetry. Insets show schematics for the primary unit cells. The lower panels show the bulk bands projected onto k and k planes near the degenerate point (black dots)
Fig. 2Topological pseudospin-valley states with saddle surfaces. a One-half of the surface BZ projected onto the k plane. b The schematic of the interface. c Numerical results for the projected band structures along the high symmetric directions of the surface BZ. The shadow regions indicate the bulk pass bands. d Zoom-in surface states for the whole surface BZ. e Acoustic pseudospins (marked in c) are hybridized by symmetric (S) and anti-symmetric (A) states with ±π/2 phases delay, forming S ± iA. f Acoustic pseudospin sphere on the base of S (noted as S), iA and iA states, where red and green circles represent opposite chirality, and the corresponding arrows represent pseudospins
Fig. 3Backscattering suppressed sound transport. a Experimental transmission spectra along the – direction, where red, blue and black lines represent the straight, z-shape and bulk conditions, respectively. The shadow regions indicate the bulk pass bands. b Simulated field distributions of the acoustic pressure for both straight and z-shape waveguides. c, d Experimental transmission spectra along the – direction and corresponding field simulations. The loss is considered in simulations, except for one case (noted as lossless) for comparison. The white dashed lines indicate the interfaces
Fig. 4Hyperbolic behaviour for the acoustic topological pseudospin-valley states. a The unit cell with increased height. b Numerical results for the projected band structures along the high symmetric directions of the surface BZ. c Zoom-in 3D view of the surface states in an eye shape. d, e Experimental transmission spectra along the – and – directions, respectively. Dashed box represents the frequency region of the eye. The shadow regions indicate the bulk pass bands