Literature DB >> 30385609

Differential Burden of Rare and Common Variants on Tumor Characteristics, Survival, and Mode of Detection in Breast Cancer.

Jingmei Li1,2,3, Emilio Ugalde-Morales3, Wei Xiong Wen4, Brennan Decker5,6,7, Mikael Eriksson3, Astrid Torstensson8, Helene Nordahl Christensen8, Alison M Dunning7, Jamie Allen7, Craig Luccarini7, Karen A Pooley7, Jacques Simard9, Leila Dorling7, Douglas F Easton7, Soo Hwang Teo4, Per Hall3,10, Kamila Czene3.   

Abstract

Genetic variants that increase breast cancer risk can be rare or common. This study tests whether the genetic risk stratification of breast cancer by rare and common variants in established loci can discriminate tumors with different biology, patient survival, and mode of detection. Multinomial logistic regression tested associations between genetic risk load [protein-truncating variant (PTV) carriership in 31 breast cancer predisposition genes-or polygenic risk score (PRS) using 162 single-nucleotide polymorphisms], tumor characteristics, and mode of detection (OR). Ten-year breast cancer-specific survival (HR) was estimated using Cox regression models. In this unselected cohort of 5,099 patients with breast cancer diagnosed in Sweden between 2001 and 2008, PTV carriers (n = 597) were younger and associated with more aggressive tumor phenotypes (ER-negative, large size, high grade, high proliferation, luminal B, and basal-like subtype) and worse outcome (HR, 1.65; 1.16-2.36) than noncarriers. After excluding 92 BRCA1/2 carriers, PTV carriership remained associated with high grade and worse survival (HR, 1.76; 1.21-2.56). In 5,007 BRCA1/2 noncarriers, higher PRS was associated with less aggressive tumor characteristics (ER-positive, PR-positive, small size, low grade, low proliferation, and luminal A subtype). Among patients with low mammographic density (<25%), non-BRCA1/2 PTV carriers were more often interval than screen-detected breast cancer (OR, 1.89; 1.12-3.21) than noncarriers. In contrast, higher PRS was associated with lower risk of interval compared with screen-detected cancer (OR, 0.77; 0.64-0.93) in women with low mammographic density. These findings suggest that rare and common breast cancer susceptibility loci are differentially associated with tumor characteristics, survival, and mode of detection.Significance: These findings offer the potential to improve screening practices for breast cancer by providing a deeper understanding of how risk variants affect disease progression and mode of detection. Cancer Res; 78(21); 6329-38. ©2018 AACR. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30385609     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-1018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  8 in total

1.  Leveraging genetic interactions for adverse drug-drug interaction prediction.

Authors:  Sheng Qian; Siqi Liang; Haiyuan Yu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Interval breast cancer is associated with other types of tumors.

Authors:  Felix Grassmann; Wei He; Mikael Eriksson; Marike Gabrielson; Per Hall; Kamila Czene
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Germline breast cancer susceptibility genes, tumor characteristics, and survival.

Authors:  Jingmei Li; Mikael Hartman; Peh Joo Ho; Alexis J Khng; Hui Wen Loh; Weang-Kee Ho; Cheng Har Yip; Nur Aishah Mohd-Taib; Veronique Kiak Mien Tan; Benita Kiat-Tee Tan; Su-Ming Tan; Ern Yu Tan; Swee Ho Lim; Suniza Jamaris; Yirong Sim; Fuh Yong Wong; Joanne Ngeow; Elaine Hsuen Lim; Mei Chee Tai; Eldarina Azfar Wijaya; Soo Chin Lee; Ching Wan Chan; Shaik Ahmad Buhari; Patrick M Y Chan; Juliana J C Chen; Jaime Chin Mui Seah; Wai Peng Lee; Chi Wei Mok; Geok Hoon Lim; Evan Woo; Sung-Won Kim; Jong Won Lee; Min Hyuk Lee; Sue K Park; Alison M Dunning; Douglas F Easton; Marjanka K Schmidt; Soo-Hwang Teo
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 11.117

4.  Overlap of high-risk individuals predicted by family history, and genetic and non-genetic breast cancer risk prediction models: implications for risk stratification.

Authors:  Soo-Hwang Teo; Jingmei Li; Mikael Hartman; Peh Joo Ho; Weang Kee Ho; Alexis J Khng; Yen Shing Yeoh; Benita Kiat-Tee Tan; Ern Yu Tan; Geok Hoon Lim; Su-Ming Tan; Veronique Kiak Mien Tan; Cheng-Har Yip; Nur-Aishah Mohd-Taib; Fuh Yong Wong; Elaine Hsuen Lim; Joanne Ngeow; Wen Yee Chay; Lester Chee Hao Leong; Wei Sean Yong; Chin Mui Seah; Siau Wei Tang; Celene Wei Qi Ng; Zhiyan Yan; Jung Ah Lee; Kartini Rahmat; Tania Islam; Tiara Hassan; Mei-Chee Tai; Chiea Chuen Khor; Jian-Min Yuan; Woon-Puay Koh; Xueling Sim; Alison M Dunning; Manjeet K Bolla; Antonis C Antoniou
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 11.150

5.  Higher polygenic risk for melanoma is associated with improved survival in a high ultraviolet radiation setting.

Authors:  Mathias Seviiri; Richard A Scolyer; D Timothy Bishop; Julia A Newton-Bishop; Mark M Iles; Serigne N Lo; Johnathan R Stretch; Robyn P M Saw; Omgo E Nieweg; Kerwin F Shannon; Andrew J Spillane; Scott D Gordon; Catherine M Olsen; David C Whiteman; Maria Teresa Landi; John F Thompson; Georgina V Long; Stuart MacGregor; Matthew H Law
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 8.440

Review 6.  Clinical applications of polygenic breast cancer risk: a critical review and perspectives of an emerging field.

Authors:  Tatiane Yanes; Mary-Anne Young; Bettina Meiser; Paul A James
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  Association between breast cancer risk and disease aggressiveness: Characterizing underlying gene expression patterns.

Authors:  Emilio Ugalde-Morales; Felix Grassmann; Keith Humphreys; Jingmei Li; Mikael Eriksson; Nicholas P Tobin; Åke Borg; Johan Vallon-Christersson; Per Hall; Kamila Czene
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Personalizing Breast Cancer Screening Based on Polygenic Risk and Family History.

Authors:  Jeroen J van den Broek; Clyde B Schechter; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; A Cecile J W Janssens; Michael C Wolfson; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Jacques Simard; Douglas F Easton; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Peter Kraft; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 11.816

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.