| Literature DB >> 30385442 |
Ge Zhang1,2, Bo Jacobsson3,4, Jonas Bacelis3, Julius Juodakis5, Kristina M Adams Waldorf3,6,7, Verena Sengpiel3, Louis J Muglia1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether uterine distention is associated with human pregnancy duration in a non-invasive observational setting.Entities:
Keywords: gestational age at birth; large for gestational age; preterm delivery; small for gestational age; twins; uterine distention
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30385442 PMCID: PMC6252709 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022929
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Figure 1Flow chart for selection of analysed pregnancies. Two grey boxes represent the analysis in Model 1; two yellow boxes represent analysis in Model 2. AGA, child’s birth weight is appropriate for gestational age; BMI, body mass index; LGA and SGA, birth weight is large and small for gestational age, respectively; LMP, last menstrual period.
Figure 2(Panel A) Interaction pattern in Model 1, where the uterine load is modelled as twin versus singleton pregnancies. (Panel B) Interaction pattern in Model 2, where uterine load is modelled as too large versus too small birth weight for gestational age in singleton pregnancies (large for gestational age (LGA) and small for gestational age (SGA), respectively). Observations are grouped based on maternal height bins. N—count of observations used to estimate mean. The interaction effect of maternal height and uterine load on gestational duration is demonstrated by the different slopes of the two regression lines calculated in the two groups with a different uterine load.
Estimated effect sizes in Model 1 from multiple linear regression
| Coefficient | Estimate | SE | P values |
| β0 (intercept) | 258.2 | 0.412 | <1E−150 |
| β1 (MH) | 0.131 | 0.002 | <1E−150 |
| β2 (UL) | −69.20 | 5.619 | 8E−35 |
| β3 (MH × UL) | 0.252 | 0.033 | 5E−14 |
Estimate is expressed in days of gestation.
MH, maternal height (cm); p values, statistical significance; UL, uterine load (singletons=0, twins=1).
Estimated effect sizes in Model 2 from multiple linear regression
| Coefficient | Estimate | SE | P values |
| β0 (intercept) | 264.6 | 1.646 | <1E−150 |
| β1 (MH) | 0.096 | 0.0099 | 5E−22 |
| β2 (UL) | −20.13 | 2.598 | 1E−14 |
| β3 (MH × UL) | 0.105 | 0.0154 | 1E−11 |
Estimate is expressed in days of gestation.
MH, maternal height (cm); p values, statistical significance; UL, uterine load (SGA=0, LGA=1).
Figure 3Preterm birth in short mothers with: (Panel A) twin pregnancies and (Panel B) extreme fetal growth. Short stature is defined as <161 cm. Preterm birth is defined as delivery before 259 days of gestation. Extreme fetal growth is defined as >2.75 birthweight Z-score (adjusted for gestational age). The grey angular lines denote 95% CI for the expected OR in stratum D, estimated as the product of ORs in strata B and C with the assumption of no interaction. In Panel A, the OR in stratum D is larger than expected due to the interaction between maternal height and fetal growth (interaction p=0.1, logistic regression). In Panel B, the OR in stratum D is significantly larger than expected due to the interaction between maternal height and fetal growth (interaction p<0.0005, logistic regression).