K J Roberts1, C A Bannister2, H Schrem3. 1. Honorary Reader and Consultant Surgeon, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, UK. Electronic address: j.k.roberts@bham.ac.uk. 2. Digital Health Laboratories, UK. 3. Consultant Surgeon, Dept Visceral, General and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) and malnutrition are prevalent among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) can correct PEI but its use among patients with pancreatic cancer is unclear as are effects upon survival. This population-based study sought to address these issues METHODS: Subjects with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were identified from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Propensity score matching generated matched pairs of subjects who did and did not receive PERT. Progression to all-cause mortality was compared using parametric survival models that included a range of relevant co-variables RESULTS: PERT use among the whole cohort (987/4554) was 21.7%. Some 1614 subjects generated 807 matched pairs. This resulted in a total, censored follow-up period of 1643 years. There were 1403 deaths in total, representing unadjusted mortality rates of 748 and 994 deaths per 1000 person-years for PERT-treated cases and their matched non-PERT-treated controls, respectively. With reference to the observed survival in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients, adjusted median survival time was 262% greater in PERT-treated cases (survival time ratio (STR) = 2.62, 95% CI 2.27-3.02) when compared with matched, non-PERT-treated controls. Survival remained significantly greater among subjects receiving PERT regardless of the studied subgroup with respect to use of surgery or chemotherapy CONCLUSIONS: This population based study observes that the majority of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma do not receive PERT. PERT is associated with increased survival among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma suggesting a lack of clinical awareness and potential benefit of addressing malnutrition among these patients.
BACKGROUND:Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) and malnutrition are prevalent among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) can correct PEI but its use among patients with pancreatic cancer is unclear as are effects upon survival. This population-based study sought to address these issues METHODS: Subjects with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were identified from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Propensity score matching generated matched pairs of subjects who did and did not receive PERT. Progression to all-cause mortality was compared using parametric survival models that included a range of relevant co-variables RESULTS:PERT use among the whole cohort (987/4554) was 21.7%. Some 1614 subjects generated 807 matched pairs. This resulted in a total, censored follow-up period of 1643 years. There were 1403 deaths in total, representing unadjusted mortality rates of 748 and 994 deaths per 1000 person-years for PERT-treated cases and their matched non-PERT-treated controls, respectively. With reference to the observed survival in pancreatic adenocarcinomapatients, adjusted median survival time was 262% greater in PERT-treated cases (survival time ratio (STR) = 2.62, 95% CI 2.27-3.02) when compared with matched, non-PERT-treated controls. Survival remained significantly greater among subjects receiving PERT regardless of the studied subgroup with respect to use of surgery or chemotherapy CONCLUSIONS: This population based study observes that the majority of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma do not receive PERT. PERT is associated with increased survival among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma suggesting a lack of clinical awareness and potential benefit of addressing malnutrition among these patients.
Authors: Daniel de la Iglesia; Bartu Avci; Mariia Kiriukova; Nikola Panic; Maryana Bozhychko; Vasile Sandru; Enrique de-Madaria; Gabriele Capurso Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2020-07-06 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Chris E Forsmark; Gong Tang; Hongzhi Xu; Marie Tuft; Steven J Hughes; Dhiraj Yadav Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2020-04-06 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Adithya M Pathanki; Joseph A Attard; Elizabeth Bradley; Sarah Powell-Brett; Bobby V M Dasari; John R Isaac; Keith J Roberts; Nikolaos A Chatzizacharias Journal: World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol Date: 2020-04-12
Authors: Eila K Watson; Jo Brett; Harriet Hay; Cara Witwicki; Anna Perris; Alan J Poots; Steve Sizmur; Zahir Soonawalla; Amy Tallett Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-11-04 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: E Martin-Perez; J E Domínguez-Muñoz; F Botella-Romero; L Cerezo; F Matute Teresa; T Serrano; R Vera Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Mary E Phillips; Andrew D Hopper; John S Leeds; Keith J Roberts; Laura McGeeney; Sinead N Duggan; Rajesh Kumar Journal: BMJ Open Gastroenterol Date: 2021-06