Literature DB >> 3038512

Characterization of mineral population by index particle: implication for the Stanton hypothesis.

A G Wylie, R L Virta, J M Segreti.   

Abstract

Fibers from seven crocidolite samples used by M. F. Stanton et al. (J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 67, 965-975 (1981] were measured from STEM and optical images. Their masses were computed. From these data, the population was normalized to a sample mass of 1 micrograms, and the number of fibers in various size categories of a 1-microgram sample was compared to the tumor probability for each sample. The purposes of this study were (1) to evaluate errors in and the utility of population characterization by index number (log of the number of particles longer than 8 micron with widths equal to or less than 0.25 micron) and (2) to review the Stanton hypothesis in view of this analysis. The study found that in most cases the index number is a reliable population parameter. However, index numbers between 0 and 2.5 cannot be obtained. Therefore, populations of mineral fibers will fall into two groups: those without index particles, which have indeterminant index numbers, and those with index numbers between 2.5 and 6.0. Within Stanton's populations that contain index particles, where y equals logit tumor probability and x equals index number, r equals 0.307 (insignificant). Where y equals tumor probability and x equals index number, r equals 0.503 (significant). The correlation coefficients are low enough to suggest the possibility that factors other than size and shape play a role in mineral fiber carcinogenicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3038512     DOI: 10.1016/s0013-9351(87)80043-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  4 in total

1.  Assessment of the pathogenic potential of asbestiform vs. nonasbestiform particulates (cleavage fragments) in in vitro (cell or organ culture) models and bioassays.

Authors:  Brooke T Mossman
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  A commentary on Roggli's "The So-Called Short-Fiber Controversy".

Authors:  David Egilman; Triet Tran
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2016-05-24

Review 3.  Role of mutagenicity in asbestos fiber-induced carcinogenicity and other diseases.

Authors:  Sarah X L Huang; Marie-Claude Jaurand; David W Kamp; John Whysner; Tom K Hei
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 6.393

Review 4.  Quantification of short and long asbestos fibers to assess asbestos exposure: a review of fiber size toxicity.

Authors:  Guillaume Boulanger; Pascal Andujar; Jean-Claude Pairon; Marie-Annick Billon-Galland; Chantal Dion; Pascal Dumortier; Patrick Brochard; Annie Sobaszek; Pierre Bartsch; Christophe Paris; Marie-Claude Jaurand
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 5.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.