Literature DB >> 30383606

Platelet Reactivity in Patients on Aspirin and Clopidogrel Therapy Measured by a New Bedside Whole-Blood Assay.

Amin Polzin1, Carolin Helten1, Lisa Dannenberg1, Philipp Mourikis1, David Naguib1, Alina Achilles1, Betül Knoop1, Saif Zako1, Susanne Rehder2, Klaus Görlinger3,4, Bodo Levkau5, Tobias Zeus1, Malte Kelm1, Thomas Hohlfeld6, Till Hoffmann2.   

Abstract

Various tests are available for measuring on-treatment platelet reactivity. The pharmacologically most specific assays are time-consuming and elaborate. A highly specific and convenient assay would be desirable for clinical routine. In this pilot study, we aimed to examine the ability of a novel bedside whole-blood assay-ROTEM platelet-to evaluate platelet inhibition compared with established assays. Platelet reactivity was investigated in 93 patients. Forty-Seven patients were on permanent aspirin therapy and 46 on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel. We used ROTEM platelet impedance aggregometry (ROTEM-PTL), light transmission aggregometry (LTA), Multiplate electrode aggregometry (MEA) and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein flow cytometry. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses showed ROTEM-PTL differentiates well between patients on medication and healthy individuals: aspirin: ROCAUC 0.99 (95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.01); P < 0.0001; DAPT treatment: ROCAUC 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.91); P < 0.001. Pearson regression analyses showed moderate correlations between assays. Aspirin: MEA versus ROTEM-PTL r = 0.435, P ≤ 0.001; LTA versus ROTEM-PTL r = 0.048, P = 0.180. DAPT: MEA versus ROTEM-PTL r = 0.398, P = 0.001; LTA versus ROTEM-PTL r = 0.409, P = 0.001; vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein versus ROTEM-PTL r = 0.164, P = 0.055. ROTEM platelet distinguished well between treated and healthy individuals but correlated moderately with other assays. Clinical trials are needed to investigate the ability of this new assay to identify patients at risk of adverse events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30383606     DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol        ISSN: 0160-2446            Impact factor:   3.105


  3 in total

1.  Net platelet clot strength of thromboelastography platelet mapping assay for the identification of high on-treatment platelet reactivity in post-PCI patients.

Authors:  Daye Cheng; Shuo Zhao; Yiwen Hao
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  The role of evidence-based algorithms for rotational thromboelastometry-guided bleeding management.

Authors:  Klaus Görlinger; Antonio Pérez-Ferrer; Daniel Dirkmann; Fuat Saner; Marc Maegele; Ángel Augusto Pérez Calatayud; Tae-Yop Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-05-17

3.  Rotational Thromboelastometry in High-Risk Patients on Dual Antithrombotic Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Anne-Marije Hulshof; Renske H Olie; Minka J A Vries; Paul W M Verhezen; Paola E J van der Meijden; Hugo Ten Cate; Yvonne M C Henskens
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.