Literature DB >> 30382924

Open questions: why are babies rarely born with cancer?

Michelle Monje1.   

Abstract

Childhood cancer is fundamentally a disease of dysregulated development. Why does it rarely occur during the fetal period, a time of enormous growth and development?

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30382924      PMCID: PMC6211449          DOI: 10.1186/s12915-018-0601-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Biol        ISSN: 1741-7007            Impact factor:   7.431


Cancer is the leading cause of disease-related morbidity and mortality during childhood. Fundamentally, childhood cancers are diseases of dysregulated development. So why does cancer rarely form during the most intense period of human development? The prenatal period is a time of enormous growth, with the length of a human embryo increasing from 3 mm at 3-weeks gestation to 90 mm at 12-weeks gestation, and the fetus growing to ~ 500 mm by birth. This represents a ~ 170-fold increase in size through a massive expansion of cellular proliferation during prenatal development. And yet, congenital cancer—defined as cancer emerging during the prenatal period up to the first 3 months of postnatal life—is rare, accounting for only 1–2% of all pediatric cancers with a prevalence of one case in 12,500–27,500 live births [1]. By the middle of the first year of life, however, this period of exemption wanes and cancer incidence sharply increases. Is congenital cancer rare because time and environmental exposure are required to accumulate the mutations that drive malignancy? Several lines of evidence suggest that the answer is no. First, pediatric cancers exhibit a low mutational burden relative to adult cancers [2, 3], so low that in fact a significant proportion (10%) of childhood cancers exhibit no mutations at all [2, 3]. These genomically silent childhood cancers appear to be epigenetically driven [4], but how these cancer cells arrive at a malignant state remains to be fully elucidated. This low mutational burden suggests that childhood cancer initiation does not necessarily require the accumulation of multiple oncogenic mutations. Second, in several examples of childhood cancer the driver mutation occurs prenatally, but the cancer does not emerge until a later timepoint in childhood development. For example, leukemogenic mutations can be retrospectively identified in the neonatal blood spots of young children with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), indicating that the key mutation was present prenatally but cancer initiation was delayed until later in infancy [5]. Thus, in the prenatal period the critical mutation may be present, cellular proliferation is at a peak, the tissue microenvironment is rich with growth signals, and yet tumors only rarely occur. Is a protective mechanism at play? Do cells in the prenatal and perinatal period of development exist in a cellular state less permissive to transformation? If this speculation is correct, understanding the manner in which fetal cells typically guard against malignancy could elucidate novel therapeutic strategies applicable to cancer prevention and therapy at all ages.
  5 in total

1.  Lowered H3K27me3 and DNA hypomethylation define poorly prognostic pediatric posterior fossa ependymomas.

Authors:  Jill Bayliss; Piali Mukherjee; Chao Lu; Siddhant U Jain; Chan Chung; Daniel Martinez; Benjamin Sabari; Ashley S Margol; Pooja Panwalkar; Abhijit Parolia; Melike Pekmezci; Richard C McEachin; Marcin Cieslik; Benita Tamrazi; Benjamin A Garcia; Gaspare La Rocca; Mariarita Santi; Peter W Lewis; Cynthia Hawkins; Ari Melnick; C David Allis; Craig B Thompson; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Alexander R Judkins; Sriram Venneti
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Backtracking leukemia to birth: identification of clonotypic gene fusion sequences in neonatal blood spots.

Authors:  K B Gale; A M Ford; R Repp; A Borkhardt; C Keller; O B Eden; M F Greaves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The landscape of genomic alterations across childhood cancers.

Authors:  Susanne N Gröbner; Barbara C Worst; Joachim Weischenfeldt; Ivo Buchhalter; Kortine Kleinheinz; Vasilisa A Rudneva; Pascal D Johann; Gnana Prakash Balasubramanian; Maia Segura-Wang; Sebastian Brabetz; Sebastian Bender; Barbara Hutter; Dominik Sturm; Elke Pfaff; Daniel Hübschmann; Gideon Zipprich; Michael Heinold; Jürgen Eils; Christian Lawerenz; Serap Erkek; Sander Lambo; Sebastian Waszak; Claudia Blattmann; Arndt Borkhardt; Michaela Kuhlen; Angelika Eggert; Simone Fulda; Manfred Gessler; Jenny Wegert; Roland Kappler; Daniel Baumhoer; Stefan Burdach; Renate Kirschner-Schwabe; Udo Kontny; Andreas E Kulozik; Dietmar Lohmann; Simone Hettmer; Cornelia Eckert; Stefan Bielack; Michaela Nathrath; Charlotte Niemeyer; Günther H Richter; Johannes Schulte; Reiner Siebert; Frank Westermann; Jan J Molenaar; Gilles Vassal; Hendrik Witt; Birgit Burkhardt; Christian P Kratz; Olaf Witt; Cornelis M van Tilburg; Christof M Kramm; Gudrun Fleischhack; Uta Dirksen; Stefan Rutkowski; Michael Frühwald; Katja von Hoff; Stephan Wolf; Thomas Klingebiel; Ewa Koscielniak; Pablo Landgraf; Jan Koster; Adam C Resnick; Jinghui Zhang; Yanling Liu; Xin Zhou; Angela J Waanders; Danny A Zwijnenburg; Pichai Raman; Benedikt Brors; Ursula D Weber; Paul A Northcott; Kristian W Pajtler; Marcel Kool; Rosario M Piro; Jan O Korbel; Matthias Schlesner; Roland Eils; David T W Jones; Peter Lichter; Lukas Chavez; Marc Zapatka; Stefan M Pfister
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  The epidemiology of neonatal tumours. Report of an international working group.

Authors:  S W Moore; D Satgé; A J Sasco; A Zimmermann; J Plaschkes
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Pan-cancer genome and transcriptome analyses of 1,699 paediatric leukaemias and solid tumours.

Authors:  Xiaotu Ma; Yu Liu; Yanling Liu; Ludmil B Alexandrov; Michael N Edmonson; Charles Gawad; Xin Zhou; Yongjin Li; Michael C Rusch; John Easton; Robert Huether; Veronica Gonzalez-Pena; Mark R Wilkinson; Leandro C Hermida; Sean Davis; Edgar Sioson; Stanley Pounds; Xueyuan Cao; Rhonda E Ries; Zhaoming Wang; Xiang Chen; Li Dong; Sharon J Diskin; Malcolm A Smith; Jaime M Guidry Auvil; Paul S Meltzer; Ching C Lau; Elizabeth J Perlman; John M Maris; Soheil Meshinchi; Stephen P Hunger; Daniela S Gerhard; Jinghui Zhang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  MET Inhibition Sensitizes Rhabdomyosarcoma Cells to NOTCH Signaling Suppression.

Authors:  Clara Perrone; Silvia Pomella; Matteo Cassandri; Michele Pezzella; Giuseppe Maria Milano; Marta Colletti; Cristina Cossetti; Giulia Pericoli; Angela Di Giannatale; Emmanuel de Billy; Maria Vinci; Stefania Petrini; Francesco Marampon; Concetta Quintarelli; Riccardo Taulli; Josep Roma; Soledad Gallego; Simona Camero; Paolo Mariottini; Manuela Cervelli; Roberta Maestro; Lucio Miele; Biagio De Angelis; Franco Locatelli; Rossella Rota
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 2.  FAK Signaling in Rhabdomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Clara Perrone; Silvia Pomella; Matteo Cassandri; Maria Rita Braghini; Michele Pezzella; Franco Locatelli; Rossella Rota
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 5.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.