Literature DB >> 30382744

Expert viewpoints of peer support for people experiencing homelessness: A Q sort study.

Stephanie L Barker1, Nick Maguire1, Felicity L Bishop1, Lusia L Stopa1.   

Abstract

Peers have shared experiences of phenomena such as mental illness, addiction, and homelessness. Homelessness services are increasingly utilizing peers in their models to support people experiencing homelessness. While there is extensive literature on peer support in general, few studies focus on the potential change mechanisms that might underpin this intervention, particularly regarding homelessness. This study aims to utilize expert opinions to identify common viewpoints on components involved in effective peer support. Forty-three statements were developed from previous literature that broadly describes elements involved in peer support. Forty experts (20 peers and 20 professionals) ranked the statements into a hierarchy. Q methodology is a rigorous method to objectively research participants' subjective viewpoints, using a by-person rather than by-variable approach to factor analysis. The study was done in three stages: first-order analysis to identify shared viewpoints within (a) the peer participant group, (b) the professional participant group, and (c) a second-order analysis of Stage 1 and 2 results to identify common viewpoints held across participant groups. Stage 3 analysis resulted in three differing viewpoints; the dominant viewpoint asserts that effective peer support is rooted in experiential knowledge, where peers build unique, trusting relationships to provide clients with a different level of support. The results highlighted different types of peer support and defined a new one: a unidirectional, mentorship type of intentional peer support. Strengths and limitations are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30382744     DOI: 10.1037/ser0000258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Serv        ISSN: 1541-1559


  4 in total

1.  A peer-delivered intervention to reduce harm and improve the well-being of homeless people with problem substance use: the SHARPS feasibility mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Tessa Parkes; Catriona Matheson; Hannah Carver; Rebecca Foster; John Budd; Dave Liddell; Jason Wallace; Bernie Pauly; Maria Fotopoulou; Adam Burley; Isobel Anderson; Graeme MacLennan
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Assessing the feasibility, acceptability and accessibility of a peer-delivered intervention to reduce harm and improve the well-being of people who experience homelessness with problem substance use: the SHARPS study.

Authors:  Tessa Parkes; Catriona Matheson; Hannah Carver; Rebecca Foster; John Budd; Dave Liddell; Jason Wallace; Bernie Pauly; Maria Fotopoulou; Adam Burley; Isobel Anderson; Tracey Price; Joe Schofield; Graeme MacLennan
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2022-02-04

3.  'Progression capitals': How homeless health peer advocacy impacts peer advocates.

Authors:  P J Annand; Lucy Platt; Sujit D Rathod; Paniz Hosseini; Andrew Guise
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  What Makes Intentional Unidirectional Peer Support for Homeless People Work? An Exploratory Analysis Based on Clients' and Peer Workers' Perceptions.

Authors:  Sandra H H Schel; Linda van den Dries; Judith R L M Wolf
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2022-03-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.