Literature DB >> 30382006

Engaging Multidisciplinary Stakeholders to Drive Shared Decision-Making in Oncology.

Gabrielle Rocque1, Ellen Miller-Sonnet2, Alan Balch3, Carrie Stricker4, Josh Seidman5, Susan Stiles6, John Ruggerio7, Nancy Paynter7, Mark Lewis8, Arif Kamal9.   

Abstract

Although recognized as best practice, regular integration of shared decision-making (SDM) approaches between patients and oncologists remains an elusive goal. It is clear that usable, feasible, and practical tools are needed to drive increased SDM in oncology. To address this goal, we convened a multidisciplinary collaborative inclusive of experts across the health-care delivery ecosystem to identify key principles in designing and testing processes to promote SDM in routine oncology practice. In this commentary, we describe 3 best practices for addressing challenges associated with implementing SDM that emerged from a multidisciplinary collaborative: (1) engagement of diverse stakeholders who have interest in SDM, (2) development and validation of an evidence-based SDM tool grounded within an established conceptual framework, and (3) development of the necessary roadmap and consideration of the infrastructure needed for engendering patient engagement in decision-making. We believe these 3 principles are critical to the success of creating SDM tools to be utilized both within and outside of clinical practice. We are optimistic that shared use across settings will support adoption of this tool and overcome barriers to implementing SDM within busy clinical workflows. Ultimately, we hope that this work will offer new perspectives on what is important to patients and provide an important impetus for leveraging patient preferences and values in decision-making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision-making; oncology; patient preference

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30382006     DOI: 10.1177/0825859718810723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Care        ISSN: 0825-8597            Impact factor:   2.250


  6 in total

1.  What Exactly Is Shared Decision-Making? A Qualitative Study of Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Anne C Melzer; Sara E Golden; Sarah S Ono; Santanu Datta; Kristina Crothers; Christopher G Slatore
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Impact of active cancer on COVID-19 survival: a matched-analysis on 557 consecutive patients at an Academic Hospital in Lombardy, Italy.

Authors:  Alexia F Bertuzzi; Michele Ciccarelli; Andrea Marrari; Nicolò Gennaro; Andrea Dipasquale; Laura Giordano; Umberto Cariboni; Vittorio Lorenzo Quagliuolo; Marco Alloisio; Armando Santoro
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 9.075

3.  Improving personalized treatment decision-making for older adults with cancer: The necessity of eliciting patient preferences.

Authors:  Daniel R Richardson; Kah Poh Loh
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 4.  End-of-Life Care in Individuals With Serious Mental Illness.

Authors:  Daniel Shalev; Lauren Fields; Peter A Shapiro
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 2.386

5.  Health locus of control in cancer patient and oncologist decision-making: An exploratory qualitative study.

Authors:  Keren Dopelt; Osnat Bashkin; Noam Asna; Nadav Davidovitch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The missing voice in multidisciplinary tumor boards.

Authors:  Gabrielle Rocque; Stephanie Wheeler; Grant R Williams
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.599

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.