| Literature DB >> 30381904 |
Martin Alexander Fischer1, Simon Güllert1,2, Sarah Refai3, Sven Künzel4, Uwe Deppenmeier3, Wolfgang R Streit2, Ruth Anne Schmitz1.
Abstract
Ammonia caused disturbance of biogas production is one of the most frequent incidents in regular operation of biogas reactors. This study provides a detailed insight into the microbial community of a mesophilic, full-scale biogas reactor (477 kWh h-1 ) fed with maize silage, dried poultry manure and cow manure undergoing initial process disturbance by increased ammonia concentration. Over a time period of 587 days, the microbial community of the reactor was regularly monitored on a monthly basis by high-throughput amplicon sequencing of the archaeal and bacterial 16S rRNA genes. During this sampling period, the total ammonia concentrations varied between 2.7 and 5.8 g l-1 [NH4 + -N]. To gain further inside into the active metabolic pathways, for selected time points metatranscriptomic shotgun analysis was performed allowing the quantification of marker genes for methanogenesis, hydrolysis and syntrophic interactions. The results obtained demonstrated a microbial community typical for a mesophilic biogas plant. However in response to the observed changing process conditions (e.g. increasing NH4 + levels, changing feedstock composition), the microbial community reacted highly flexible by changing and adapting the community composition. The Methanosarcina-dominated archaeal community was shifted to a Methanomicrobiales-dominated archaeal community in the presence of increased ammonia conditions. A similar trend as in the phylogenetic composition was observed in the transcription activity of genes coding for enzymes involved in acetoclastic methanogenesis and syntrophic acetate oxidations (Codh/Acs and Fthfs). In accordance, Clostridia simultaneously increased under elevated ammonia concentrations in abundance and were identified as the primary syntrophic interaction partner with the now Methanomicrobiales-dominated archaeal community. In conclusion, overall stable process performance was maintained during increased ammonia concentration in the studied reactor based on the microbial communities' ability to flexibly respond by reorganizing the community composition while remaining functionally stable.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30381904 PMCID: PMC6390037 DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.13313
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Biotechnol ISSN: 1751-7915 Impact factor: 5.813
Physicochemical parameters of the biogas reactors
| Sample ID | Day | MSL (t month−1) | DPM (t month−1) | CM (t month−1) | OLR (kg oTS m−3 d−1) | CH4‐calc. (10−3 m3 kgoTS −1 d−1) | CH4‐measured (10−3 m3 kgoTS −1 d−1) | EC (mS cm−1) | Ammonia [NH4 +–N g l−1] | HRT (days) | VFA/TAC | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGR02 | 0 | 231.4 | 69.4 | 43.8 | 4.0 | 4.10 | 4.09 | 35.6 | 3.1 | 75.7 | 0.2 | 7.9 |
| BGR03 | 82 | 218.6 | 64.7 | 40.8 | 3.7 | 3.86 | 4.24 | 34.2 | 3.0 | 80.4 | 0.2 | 8.0 |
| BGR04 | 123 | 222.6 | 92.7 | 32.2 | 4.0 | 3.94 | 4.10 | 40.7 | 4.4 | 78.5 | 0.2 | 8.0 |
| BGR05 | 174 | 237.8 | 92.3 | 34.3 | 4.2 | 4.02 | 3.83 | 41.3 | 4.4 | 76.4 | 0.2 | 8.2 |
| BGR06 | 200 | 224.1 | 78.1 | 36.2 | 4.0 | 3.87 | 3.33 | 45.7 | 4.9 | 78.4 | 0.2 | 8.1 |
| BGR07 | 226 | 229.4 | 77.3 | 37.2 | 4.0 | 3.87 | 3.70 | 50.6 | 5.8 | 79.5 | 0.2 | 8.0 |
| BGR08 | 253 | 223.0 | 72.9 | 37.7 | 4.0 | 3.90 | 3.50 | 48.0 | 5.1 | 78.9 | 0.2 | 8.3 |
| BGR09 | 301 | 221.5 | 72.4 | 38.0 | 3.8 | 3.83 | 4.07 | 47.1 | 4.9 | 81.3 | 0.2 | 8.1 |
| BGR10 | 316 | 236.1 | 92.8 | 22.9 | 4.1 | 2.64 | 4.12 | 44.7 | 4.7 | 76.1 | 0.2 | 8.1 |
| BGR11 | 346 | 211.8 | 98.7 | 9.4 | 4.1 | 2.61 | 3.58 | 44.9 | 4.1 | 79.6 | 0.2 | 8.1 |
| BGR12 | 375 | 242.4 | 99.6 | 16.7 | 4.1 | 2.66 | 4.24 | 38.5 | 3.7 | 77.5 | 0.2 | 8.0 |
| BGR13 | 408 | 203.8 | 84.1 | 18.7 | 3.6 | 2.38 | 3.45 | 36.6 | 3.4 | 84.8 | 0.2 | 8.0 |
| BGR14 | 450 | 232.4 | 93.5 | 20.5 | 4.0 | 2.60 | 1.82 | 39.1 | 3.8 | 77.6 | 0.2 | 7.9 |
| BGR15 | 462 | 227.1 | 87.3 | 21.5 | 4.0 | 2.61 |
| 41.9 | 4.0 | 79.0 | 0.2 | 8.1 |
| BGR16 | 492 | 250.9 | 110.3 | 26.6 | 4.5 | 4.44 |
| 34.6 | 3.0 | 72.2 | 0.2 | 7.9 |
| BGR17 | 526 | 275.0 | 94.9 | 35.5 | 4.7 | 4.47 | 2.21 | 31.4 | 2.9 | 71.7 | 0.2 | 7.8 |
| BGR18 | 553 | 261.0 | 69.1 | 36.2 | 4.4 | 4.33 | 4.61 | 29.9 | 2.7 | 76.0 | 0.2 | 7.8 |
| BGR19 | 587 | 222.5 | 50.8 | 31.8 | 3.5 | 3.52 | 3.45 | 35.4 | 3.2 | 93.9 | 0.2 | 8.0 |
Day starting from the first sampling, maize silage (MSL), dried poultry manure (DPM), cow manure (CM), organic load weight (OLR), methane amount calculated from input material (CH4‐calc.), methane amount measured (CH4‐measured), electric conductivity (CM), hydraulic retention time in days (HRT), quotient of volatile fatty acids divided by total inorganic carbon (VFA/TAC) and pH. Weight of substrates refers to organic dry mass (oTS). Underlined values for methane were imputed.
Figure 1Substrate composition and methane formation (theoretical and measured) during the monitoring period. Dashed lines are applied on the second ordinate.
Figure 216S rRNA gene‐based community composition for the bacterial (A) and archaeal (B) domain within the studied biogas reactor. Classification was done using the Greengenes database (DeSantis et al., 2006) and is shown for the archaea on the order and for the bacteria on the class level. Ammonia concentrations for the samples are shown above the graphs.
Figure 3RDA based on Hellinger‐transformed OTU‐count data of the bacterial (A) and archaeal (B) community. Samples are marked by blue dots; environmental parameters contributing to the model are symbolized as red vectors. The OTUs introducing the most variance to the model are shown as black vectors. The explanatory variables are visualized as red vectors. MSL, Maize silage; DPM, dried poultry manure; CM, cow manure; CM, electric conductivity; HRT, hydraulic retention time in days; VFA, volatile fatty acids; TAC, total anorganic carbon.
Figure 4Transcriptional abundance of the genes encoding for the enzymes Codh/Acs (A), Fthfs (B) and Mcr (C). The taxonomic composition of the actively transcribing community was obtained by the annotation of the contigs harbouring the investigated marker gene.
Sequences of the primers used for 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing of the bacterial and archaeal domain
| Primer name | Sequence of the primers | |
|---|---|---|
| Archaea | Fwd Ar0787 | AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACAC |
| Rev Ar1059 | CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGAT | |
| Bacteria | Fwd Ba0027 | AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACAC |
| Rev Ba0338 | CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGAT |
Primer sequence consisted of an initial standardized Illumina adapter (regular), followed by an eight nucleotide barcode (X's) and a primer sequence (bold). Additionally, primers for the 16S analysis contained a linker sequence for the sequencing reaction on the flow cell (underlined).