| Literature DB >> 30381456 |
Lin Jin1, Jing Wang1, Fang Guan1, Jianpeng Zhang1, Shan Yu1, Shaoyan Liu1, Yuanyuan Xue1, Lingli Li1, Shuwen Wu1, Xingliang Wang1, Yihua Yang1, Heba Abdelgaffar2, Juan Luis Jurat-Fuentes2, Bruce E Tabashnik3, Yidong Wu4.
Abstract
Extensive planting of crops genetically engineered to produce insecticidal proteins from the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) has suppressed some major pests, reduced insecticide sprays, enhanced pest control by natural enemies, and increased grower profits. However, rapid evolution of resistance in pests is reducing these benefits. Better understanding of the genetic basis of resistance to Bt crops is urgently needed to monitor, delay, and counter pest resistance. We discovered that a point mutation in a previously unknown tetraspanin gene in the cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera), a devastating global pest, confers dominant resistance to Cry1Ac, the sole Bt protein produced by transgenic cotton planted in China. We found the mutation using a genome-wide association study, followed by fine-scale genetic mapping and DNA sequence comparisons between resistant and susceptible strains. CRISPR/Cas9 knockout of the tetraspanin gene restored susceptibility to a resistant strain, whereas inserting the mutation conferred 125-fold resistance in a susceptible strain. DNA screening of moths captured from 23 field sites in six provinces of northern China revealed a 100-fold increase in the frequency of this mutation, from 0.001 in 2006 to 0.10 in 2016. The correspondence between the observed trajectory of the mutation and the trajectory predicted from simulation modeling shows that the dominance of the mutation accelerated adaptation. Proactive identification and tracking of the tetraspanin mutation demonstrate the potential for genomic analysis, gene editing, and molecular monitoring to improve management of resistance.Entities:
Keywords: dominance; evolution; genetically modified; resistance management; sustainability
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30381456 PMCID: PMC6243265 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1812138115
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205