Literature DB >> 30381423

Linking Nanoscale Dynamics of AMPA Receptor Organization to Plasticity of Excitatory Synapses and Learning.

Daniel Choquet1,2,3.   

Abstract

The spatiotemporal organization of neurotransmitter receptors in the postsynaptic membrane is a fundamental determinant of synaptic transmission and thus of information processing by the brain. The ionotropic AMPA subtype of glutamate receptors (AMPARs) mediate fast excitatory synaptic transmission in the CNS. The number of AMPARs located en face presynaptic glutamate release sites sets the efficacy of synaptic transmission. Understanding how this number is set and regulated has been the topic of intense research in the last two decades. We showed that AMPARs are not stable in the synapse as initially thought. They continuously enter and exit the postsynaptic density by lateral diffusion, and they exchange between the neuronal surface and intracellular compartments by endocytosis and exocytosis at extrasynaptic sites. Regulation of these various trafficking pathways has emerged as a key mechanism for activity-dependent plasticity of synaptic transmission, a process important for learning and memory. I here present my view of these findings. In particular, the advent of super-resolution microscopy and single-molecule tracking has helped to uncover the intricacy of AMPARs' dynamic organization at the nanoscale. In addition, AMPAR surface diffusion is highly regulated by a variety of factors, including neuronal activity, stress hormones, and neurodegeneration, suggesting that AMPAR diffusion-trapping may play a central role in synapse function. Using innovative tools to understand further the link between receptor dynamics and synapse plasticity is now unveiling new molecular mechanisms of learning. Modifying AMPAR dynamics may emerge as a new target to correct synapse dysfunction in the diseased brain.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/389318-12$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AMPA receptors; Long Term Potentiation; Synaptic plasticity; neurodegenerative diseases; receptor trafficking; super resolution imaging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30381423      PMCID: PMC6705996          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2119-18.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  167 in total

Review 1.  LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches.

Authors:  Robert C Malenka; Mark F Bear
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Interaction of the N-terminal domain of the AMPA receptor GluR4 subunit with the neuronal pentraxin NP1 mediates GluR4 synaptic recruitment.

Authors:  Gek-Ming Sia; Jean-Claude Béïque; Gavin Rumbaugh; Richard Cho; Paul F Worley; Richard L Huganir
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Spatial and Temporal Regulation of Receptor Endocytosis in Neuronal Dendrites Revealed by Imaging of Single Vesicle Formation.

Authors:  Morgane Rosendale; Damien Jullié; Daniel Choquet; David Perrais
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 9.423

4.  Biochemical and immunochemical evidence that the "major postsynaptic density protein" is a subunit of a calmodulin-dependent protein kinase.

Authors:  M B Kennedy; M K Bennett; N E Erondu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The stress hormone corticosterone conditions AMPAR surface trafficking and synaptic potentiation.

Authors:  Laurent Groc; Daniel Choquet; Francis Chaouloff
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Impaired regulation of synaptic strength in hippocampal neurons from GluR1-deficient mice.

Authors:  Bertalan K Andrásfalvy; Mark A Smith; Thilo Borchardt; Rolf Sprengel; Jeffrey C Magee
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Lateral motion of fluorescently labeled acetylcholine receptors in membranes of developing muscle fibers.

Authors:  D Axelrod; P Ravdin; D E Koppel; J Schlessinger; W W Webb; E L Elson; T R Podleski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Surface expression of AMPA receptors in hippocampal neurons is regulated by an NSF-dependent mechanism.

Authors:  J Noel; G S Ralph; L Pickard; J Williams; E Molnar; J B Uney; G L Collingridge; J M Henley
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  State-dependent mechanisms of LTP expression revealed by optical quantal analysis.

Authors:  Bonnie Ward; Lindsay McGuinness; Colin J Akerman; Alan Fine; Tim V P Bliss; Nigel J Emptage
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Constitutive hippocampal cholesterol loss underlies poor cognition in old rodents.

Authors:  Mauricio G Martin; Tariq Ahmed; Alejandra Korovaichuk; Cesar Venero; Silvia A Menchón; Isabel Salas; Sebastian Munck; Oscar Herreras; Detlef Balschun; Carlos G Dotti
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 12.137

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Advanced imaging and labelling methods to decipher brain cell organization and function.

Authors:  Daniel Choquet; Matthieu Sainlos; Jean-Baptiste Sibarita
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  The biophysical basis underlying the maintenance of early phase long-term potentiation.

Authors:  Moritz F P Becker; Christian Tetzlaff
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Cognitive aging is associated with redistribution of synaptic weights in the hippocampus.

Authors:  Eric W Buss; Nicola J Corbett; Joshua G Roberts; Natividad Ybarra; Timothy F Musial; Dina Simkin; Elizabeth Molina-Campos; Kwang-Jin Oh; Lauren L Nielsen; Gelique D Ayala; Sheila A Mullen; Anise K Farooqi; Gary X D'Souza; Corinne L Hill; Linda A Bean; Annalise E Rogalsky; Matthew L Russo; Dani M Curlik; Marci D Antion; Craig Weiss; Dane M Chetkovich; M Matthew Oh; John F Disterhoft; Daniel A Nicholson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  The next generation of approaches to investigate the link between synaptic plasticity and learning.

Authors:  Yann Humeau; Daniel Choquet
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  PKC and Ras are Involved in M1 Muscarinic Receptor-Mediated Modulation of AMPA Receptor GluA1 Subunit.

Authors:  Mu-Wen Chen; Han Zhu; Cai-Hong Xiong; Jia-Bing Li; Lan-Xue Zhao; Hong-Zhuan Chen; Yu Qiu
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 5.046

6.  A deep dive into local mRNA translation in neurons.

Authors:  Mauricio M Oliveira; Eric Klann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Target-dependent retrograde signaling mediates synaptic plasticity at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction.

Authors:  Brett Berke; Linh Le; Haig Keshishian
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.964

8.  Cortical Synaptic AMPA Receptor Plasticity during Motor Learning.

Authors:  Richard H Roth; Robert H Cudmore; Han L Tan; Ingie Hong; Yong Zhang; Richard L Huganir
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  CaMKIIα-driven, phosphatase-checked postsynaptic plasticity via phase separation.

Authors:  Qixu Cai; Menglong Zeng; Xiandeng Wu; Haowei Wu; Yumeng Zhan; Ruijun Tian; Mingjie Zhang
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 25.617

10.  Thymosin β4 reverses phenotypic polarization of glial cells and cognitive impairment via negative regulation of NF-κB signaling axis in APP/PS1 mice.

Authors:  Meng Wang; Li-Rong Feng; Zi-Long Li; Kai-Ge Ma; Ke-Wei Chang; Xin-Lin Chen; Peng-Bo Yang; Sheng-Feng Ji; Yan-Bing Ma; Hua Han; John Bosco Ruganzua; Wei-Na Yang; Yi-Hua Qian
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 8.322

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.