Literature DB >> 30381389

Hepatic abnormalities identified by staging MRI and accuracy of MRI of patients with uveal melanoma.

Jasmine H Francis1,2, Federica Catalanotti3, Jonathan Landa4, Christopher A Barker5, Alexander N Shoushtari6,7, David H Abramson3,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Metastases to the liver are often the first finding in patients with uveal melanoma with extraocular disease, but little has been published on the utility of staging MRI at initial diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the proportion of abnormal hepatic findings on baseline MRI and accuracy of MRI in patients with newly diagnosed uveal melanoma.
METHODS: This is a single-centre, retrospective, institutional review board-approved study of 145 consecutive patients diagnosed with uveal melanoma, at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 2004 and 2016, who had staging MRI within 1 month of diagnosis. Scans were classified as normal or abnormal, and further distinguished as abnormal non-metastatic, uncharacterisable lesions and suspicious for metastasis. Where available, follow-up MRI (at ~1 year) or biopsies were reviewed.
RESULTS: MRI in 145 patients revealed 62% (90) with abnormal hepatic findings; out of these 87% (78) had non-metastatic benign findings, 6.7% (6) had unclassifiable lesions and 6.7% (6) were suspicious for metastasis (6). Abnormal non-metastatic findings included 72 focal (36 solitary and 36 multiple) and 12 diffuse lesions. Lesions suspicious for metastases were found in 6 of 145 patients (4%), despite normal liver function tests. Of these, five had confirmed liver metastases and one patient had a stable, presumed non-metastatic lesion on follow-up. In this study, the sensitivity and specificity of staging MRI for all findings were 83.3% (95% CI 35.9 to 99.6) and 99.0% (95% CI 94.3 to 99.9), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Staging MRI of patients with newly diagnosed uveal melanoma accurately identified early metastases. Furthermore, imaging revealed hepatic abnormalities in the majority of patients, although as expected few of these represented metastatic disease. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  choroid; eye (Globe); imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30381389     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   5.908


  3 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of Uveal Melanoma-Current Standard and Methods in Development.

Authors:  Małgorzata Solnik; Natalia Paduszyńska; Anna M Czarnecka; Kamil J Synoradzki; Yacoub A Yousef; Tomasz Chorągiewicz; Robert Rejdak; Mario Damiano Toro; Sandrine Zweifel; Katarzyna Dyndor; Michał Fiedorowicz
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 2.  Application of Multimodal and Molecular Imaging Techniques in the Detection of Choroidal Melanomas.

Authors:  Xuying Li; Lixiang Wang; Li Zhang; Fei Tang; Xin Wei
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Combined with Perfusion-Weighted Imaging under Segmentation Algorithm in the Diagnosis of Melanoma.

Authors:  Chuankui Shi; Peng Ge; Yuping Zhao; Guobao Huang
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.009

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.