| Literature DB >> 30380659 |
Ali Mohamed Elyamine1,2,3, Mohamed G Moussa4,5, Marwa A Ismael6,7,8, Jia Wei9,10, Yuanyuan Zhao11,12, Yupeng Wu13, Chengxiao Hu14,15.
Abstract
The joint effects of earthworms and crop straw on toxic metal speciation are not clear, and very limited information is available regarding the effects of their interaction on Cd mobility in Cd contaminated soil or in remediation processes involving plants. This study evaluated their impacts on Cd mobile form changes in soil and their effects on Cd uptake by plants. Treatments included both planted and unplanted-Cd-contaminated soil with or without rice straw and/or earthworms. The results revealed that earthworms, rice straw, and plant interactions change the Cd mobile forms in soil. The order of Cd concentration of different chemical forms was as follows: exchangeable > residual > bound to Fe-Mn oxide > bound to organic matter for earthworms, and exchangeable > bound to organic matter > residual > bound to Fe-Mn oxide for rice straw treatment, with a recovery rate of 96 ± 3%. The accumulation of Cd in plants increased in the presence of earthworms and decreased in the presence of rice straw. FT-IR spectra indicated that the degradation of rice straw increases C⁻O, C⁻O⁻H, C⁻H, and O⁻H functional groups which could complex with Cd ions. These findings highlighted that earthworms' activities and crop straw can modify soil properties and structure and promote the remediation of heavy metal. This study suggests that the ecological context of remediation instead of being limiting on soil-earthworms-plant interaction, should integrate the natural resources forsaken which can provide a positive influence on both plant health and the remediation of heavy metal in contaminated soil.Entities:
Keywords: Cd fractionation; bioaccumulation; bioavailability; cadmium; earthworm; rice straw
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30380659 PMCID: PMC6266151 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15112398
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Summary of experimental design with all different treatments.
Figure 2Operating conditions used in Cd sequential extraction procedure.
The body weight of E. fetida and A. caliginosa (mg) at the beginning and the end of the experiment. Low, medium and high represent respectively Cd concentration at 0.5; 1 and, 3 mg/kg Cd.
| Initial Weight | Final Body Weight after 60 d | Initial Weight | Final Body Weight after 60 d | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treat | 0 mg.kg | Low | Medium | High | 0 mg/kg | Low | Medium | High |
|
| 1835 ± 8.4 a | 1832 ± 4.8 a | 1841 ± 5.3 a | 1830 ± 6.1 a | 3044 ± 7.6 a | 3049 ± 5.8 a | 3039 ± 6.2 ab | 3045 ± 6.5 a |
|
| 1845 ± 6.8 ab | 1883 ± 7.1 a | 1856 ± 5.7 b | 1853 ± 7.8 b | 3025 ± 5.7 b | 3043 ± 5.6 a | 3038 ± 8.1 ab | 3045 ± 5.9 a |
|
| 1825 ± 6.3 ab | 1839 ± 5.7 a | 1829 ± 6.3 ab | 1827 ± 6.7 ab | 3026 ± 4.8 ab | 3028 ± 8.2 ab | 3037 ± 7.6 a | 3028 ± 4 ab |
|
| 1834 ± 5.9 bc | 1862 ± 4.5 a | 1855 ± 5.4 b | 1836 ± 5.7 bc | 3032 ± 5.9 b | 3045 ± 5.3 a | 3048 ± 5.2 a | 3039 ± 6.4 ab |
|
| 1842 ± 7.3 ab | 1851 ± 4.8 a | 1840 ± 7.6 ab | 1845 ± 8.2 ab | 3028 ± 7.3 ab | 3037 ± 6.2 a | 3027 ± 7.4 ab | 3025 ± 7.1 ab |
|
| 1859 ± 6.3 c | 1871 ± 5.4 a | 1864 ± 5.2 ab | 1867 ± 5.1 ab | 3041 ± 5.8 ab | 3054 ± 6.5 a | 3049 ± 5.7 a | 3042 ± 8.3 ab |
Data are the mean of three replicate ± SE and were compared by Tukey’s tests. The lowercase letters in the same raw (four values) indicates significant difference at p < 0.05. E0 indicates earthworms in no planted treatment, E1 and E2 indicate respectively earthworms in pot cropped with sunflower and oat.
Influences of rice straw (S) and earthworms (E) on soil physical and chemical properties.
| Treatments | CEC | % OM | Planted Pots | Unplanted Pots | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | DOC | pH | DOC | |||
|
| 12.83 | 10.23 | 7.4 | 38.356 | 7.28 | 30.569 |
|
| 11.58 | 37.24 *** | 7.32 | 45.569 * | 7.15 | 37.542 * |
|
| 16.74 * | 25.01 ** | 6.78 * | 42.659 * | 6.89 * | 35.247 * |
|
| 13.41 | 27.51 ** | 5.91 ** | 47.586 * | 6.042 * | 37.421 * |
Data are the mean of three replicates tested by Two-way ANOVA analysis following by Tukey’s tests. The asterisks *, **, *** in the same column (four values) indicate significant difference at p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and 0.001 respectively. CEC indicates cation exchange capacity; OM, organic matter; DOC, dissolved organic carbon.
Mean Cd content in earthworm tissues after 60 days of exposure.
| Treatment | Low | Medium | High | Low | Medium | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E0 | 1.69 ± 0.3 bc | 2.85 ± 0.4 c | 5.55 ± 0.3 ab | 2.15 ± 0.2 bc | 4.29 ± 0.4 b | 7.83 ± 0.3 b |
| E0 + S | 2.52 ± 0.2 a | 5.06 ± 0.6 a | 7.73 ± 0.5 a | 4.68 ± 0.4 a | 6.37 ± 0.5 a | 9.09 ± 0.8 a |
| E1 | 1.16 ± 0.4 c | 2.35 ± 0.5 d | 3.53 ± 0.6 c | 1.95 ± 0.3 bc | 2.74 ± 0.3 c | 4.74 ± 0.4 d |
| E1 + S | 1.97 ± 0.2 b | 3.63 ± 0.4 b | 5.72 ± 0.3 ab | 2.69 ± 0.5 b | 3.84 ± 0.7 bc | 5.39 ± 0.6 c |
| E2 | 1.12 ± 0.3 c | 2.47 ± 0.7 d | 3.64 ± 0.6 c | 1.85 ± 0.4 c | 2.85 ± 0.3 c | 3.95 ± 0.5 e |
| E2 + S | 1.84 ± 0.4 b | 2.97 ± 0.5 c | 4.74 ± 0.4 b | 2.58 ± 0.6 b | 3.74 ± 0.5 bc | 5.41 ± 0.6 c |
Data are the mean of three replicate ± SE and were compared by Tukey’s tests. The lowercase letters in the same column (six values) indicates significant difference at p < 0.05. E0 indicates earthworms in no planted treatment, E1 and E2 indicate respectively earthworms in pot cropped with sunflower and oat plant.
Bioconcentration factor (BCF), uptake rate (k1) and elimination rate (k2) constants in both earthworm species exposed to cadmium for 6 d.
| Cd Concentration |
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCF | BCF | |||||
|
| 1.31 ± 0.03 | 0.024 ± 0.01 | 0.018 ± 0.06 | 1.72 ± 0.04 | 0.022 ± 0.02 | 0.013 ± 0.04 |
|
| 1.20 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.041 ± 0.04 | 1.38 ± 0.02 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.019 ± 0.01 |
|
| 0.64 ± 1.01 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.048 ± 0.07 | 0.83 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.021 ± 1.02 |
Data are the mean of three replicate ± SE and were compared by Duncan’s multiple range tests. BCF and bioaccumulation factor (BAF) were calculated as the ratio of the content of Cd in the earthworms to that in the soil. k1 was calculated by k2 × BCF.
Figure 3Effect of earthworms (E) and rice straw (S) on sunflower and oat plant root and shoot Cd accumulation under different Cd concentrations (low, 0.5 (1) medium, 1 (2) and high, 3 (3) mg/kg Cd) treatments after 60 exposure days. Different colors (Black, grey, tan…) vertical band present the mean of three replicate and were compared by Tukey’s tests. The lowercase letters in the same group (four vertical bands) indicates significant difference at p < 0.05.
Bioconcentration factor (BCF) and translocation factor (TF) in both sunflower and oat plants after 60 days of exposure.
| Sunflower Plant | Oat Plant | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | Medium | High | Low | Medium | High | |||||||
| Exp | BCF | TF | BCF | TF | BCF | TF | BCF | TF | BCF | TF | BCF | TF |
|
| 1.21 ± 0.02 | 0.45 ± 0.04 | 0.65 ± 0.03 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 0.35 ± 0.01 | 0.17 ± 0.04 | 1.67 ± 0.02 | 0.54 ± 0.03 | 1.12 ± 0.04 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.59 ± 0.02 | 0.22 ± 0.01 |
|
| 0.64 ± 0.01 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.38 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.03 | 0.31 ± 0.03 | 0.09 ± 0.03 | 0.78 ± 0.03 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | 0.53 ± 0.03 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 0.37 ± 0.03 | 0.14 ± 0.03 |
|
| 1.38 ± 0.03 | 0.59 ± 0.03 | 0.82 ± 0.02 | 0.37 ± 0.01 | 0.67 ± 0.02 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 1.43 ± 0.02 | 0.49 ± 0.04 | 0.88 ± 0.02 | 0.21 ± 0.03 | 0.43 ± 0.03 | 0.19 ± 0.02 |
|
| 1.01 ± 0.02 | 0.67 ± 0.04 | 0.46 ± 0.04 | 0.48 ± 0.03 | 0.39 ± 0.04 | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 1.21 ± 0.03 | 0.56 ± 0.02 | 0.66 ± 0.03 | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.40 ± 0.01 | 0.22 ± 0.03 |
Data are the mean of three replicate ± SD and were compared by Duncan’s multiple range tests. BCF was calculated as the ratio of the Cd content in the plant to that in the soil and TF as the ratio of the Cd content in the shoot to that of the root.
Figure 4Effect of earthworms (E) and rice straw (S) on Cd fraction extracted in unplanted different soil divided into exchangeable (A), bound to organic matter (B), bound to iron-manganese oxide (C) and residual fraction (D) under different Cd concentration (L Co (low concentration), 0.5 M Co (medium concentration), 1 and H Co (high concentration), 3 mg/kg Cd) treatments after 60 exposure days. Different colored points (Black, grey, tan…) present the mean of three replicate and were compared by Tukey’s tests. The lowercase letters in the same group (4 points) indicates significant difference at p < 0.001.
Figure 5FT-IR in 4000–400 cm−1 spectra region of rice straw. Ck indicates the spectra of rice straw untreated (natural); S, that of RS in soil and E + S the spectra of RS in soil inoculated with earthworms.
Typical absorption bands and the main functional groups of rice straw.
| Wavenumber (cm−1) | Functional Groups | Compounds |
|---|---|---|
| 3708 | O–H stretching | H2O |
| 3430 | O–H stretching | cellulose and lignin |
| 2919 and 2853 | C–H stretching vibration | Aliphatic materials |
| 1640–1500 | C=O | Ketone, carbonyl group |
| 1450–1407 | C=C stretching vibration | Aromatic skeletal |
| 1388 | C–H blending vibration | alkanes |
| 1321–1302 | C–O stretching and O–H blending | phenols, alcohols and esters |
| 1242–1162 | C–O–C stretching | aryl-alkyl ether |
| 1070 | C–O–C stretching vibration or C–O stretching and C–O deformation | ethanol group |
| 1009 | C–O–H and O–H blending | Decomposition of hemicellulose and cellulose |
| 900–700 | C–H | Aromatic hydrogen |
| 700–400 | C–C stretching |
Figure 6Linear regression performed to set up the correlation between Cd availability and soil pH (A) and soil DOC (B) variation.
Figure 7Proposed mechanism for rice straw absorption and sequestration of Cd in soil.
Figure 8Possible mechanism of some different functional groups dissociating and complexing with Cd cations in soil.