| Literature DB >> 30380633 |
Yuanyuan Li1, Jianfei Yu2, Tianli Sun3, Chunchen Liu4, Yu Sun5, You Wang6,7.
Abstract
The toxic effects of the typically noxious bloom-forming dinoflagellate Karenia mikimotoi were studied using the allelopathic experimental system under controlled laboratory conditions. The potency of intact cell suspensions with whole cells, cell-free culture filtrate in different growth phases, and lysed cells with ultrasonication were compared, and the growth and reproduction of the marine rotifer Brachionus plicatilis were used as endpoints to evaluate toxic differences. The intact cell suspension resulted the most significant growth inhibition, including lethality, on the growth of B. plicatilis (p < 0.05). Lysed culture medium treated with ultrasonication and the cell-free culture filtrates at either the exponential or stationary phase exhibited limited negative impacts compared to the control according to changes in the population growth rate (r) and survival rate (p > 0.05). Reproduction presented a similar tendency to change, and the number of eggs produced per individual, as well as spawning period decreased in the whole cell and lysed cell suspensions. The key parameters in the lift table include the net reproductive rate (R₀) and the intrinsic rate of increase (rm), which were more sensitive to treatment and were significantly suppressed compared to that of the control. The addition of the ROS inhibitor N-acetylcysteine (NAC) could not change the growth or reproduction patterns. Moreover, substantial hemolytic toxicity was found in the treatment of the intact cell suspension (p < 0.05), while limited toxicity was found in other treatments compared to that of the control. K. mikimotoi was speculated to secrete allelopathic substances onto the cell surface, and direct cell contact was necessary for allelopathic toxicity in B. plicatilis. Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-independent hemolytic toxicity was assumed to be the explanation for what was observed.Entities:
Keywords: Brachionus plicatilis; Karenia mikimotoi; ROS-dependent pathway; allelopathic effect; harmful algal blooms (HABs); hemolytic activity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30380633 PMCID: PMC6266181 DOI: 10.3390/toxins10110439
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Figure 1Effects of different treatment fluids on the population growth of Brachionus plicatilis with and without N-acetylcysteine (NAC) addition. Points were the mean ± standard error based on three replicates. (A) The growth curve of rotifers cultured with sterilized seawater as the control group (Group F) (□), or different treatment fluids of Karenia mikimotoi, Group A (●), Group B (○), Group C (▼), Group D (∆), Group E (■). (B) The growth curve of rotifers cultured with sterilized seawater as the control group (Group F) (●), or different treatment fluids of K. mikimotoi added NAC, Group A (NAC) (○), Group B (NAC) (▼), Group D (NAC) (∆).
Changes in the population growth rate (r) of rotifers co-cultured with different microalgal treatments with and without NAC addition.
| Treatment Fluids | The Population Growth Rate |
|---|---|
| group A | −0.3685 ± 0.1493 d |
| group B | 0.3903 ± 0.0066 b |
| group C | 0.5045 ± 0.0122 a |
| group D | 0.3895 ± 0.0021 b |
| group E | 0.5046 ± 0.0104 a |
| group F | 0.5080 ± 0.0078 a |
| group A (+NAC) | −0.1452 ± 0.0397 c |
| group B (+NAC) | 0.5175 ± 0.0125 a |
| group D (+NAC) | 0.5091 ± 0.0081 a |
Note: Values were means ± SE (Standard Error) of three replicates. Values followed by the same letter are not significantly different at a probability level of 0.05, as determined by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 2Allelopathic effects of different treatment fluids of Karenia mikimotoi on age-specific survivorship curves of rotifer B. plicatilis. The data are expressed as the mean ± SE (n = 3). (A) Group A; (B) Group B; (C) Group C; (D) Group D; (E) Group E; (F) Group F; (G) Group A (NAC); (H) Group B (NAC); (I) Group D (NAC).
Demographic parameters of B. plicatilis exposed to different treatment fluids of K. mikimotoi.
| Parameter | R0 | T |
| E0 | λ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | 2.0667 ± 0.3399 b | 5.1130 ± 0.1568 d | 0.1386 ± 0.0322 e | 4.5000 ± 0.2449 c | 1.1492 ± 0.0367 e |
| Group B | 12.6667 ± 2.2005 a | 7.0630 ± 0.2211 ab | 0.3571 ± 0.0167 c | 12.0000 ± 1.2570 ab | 1.4294 ± 0.0237 c |
| Group C | 13.5667 ± 1.6977 a | 7.2136 ± 0.2958 a | 0.3602 ± 0.0036 c | 12.6333 ± 0.7409 a | 1.4336 ± 0.0052 c |
| Group D | 15.1000 ± 2.6470 a | 6.8249 ± 0.3748 ab | 0.3953 ± 0.0144 bc | 13.0333 ± 0.2357 a | 1.4850 ± 0.0214 c |
| Group E | 13.6333 ± 2.9318 a | 6.5161 ± 0.6245 b | 0.4010 ± 0.0456 bc | 12.7333 ± 0.0471 a | 1.4948 ± 0.0672 bc |
| Group F | 15.6333 ± 2.4226 a | 6.4576 ± 0.2978 bc | 0.4239 ± 0.0088 b | 12.2333 ± 0.4497 ab | 1.5280 ± 0.0135 bc |
| Group A(NAC) | 3.3667 ± 0.3771 b | 5.2338 ± 0.3310 cd | 0.2315 ± 0.0231 d | 9.3000 ± 0.2944 b | 1.2609 ± 0.0290 d |
| Group B(NAC) | 13.7000 ± 0.5354 a | 5.3092 ± 0.0751 cd | 0.4929 ± 0.0106 a | 10.4000 ± 0.9899 b | 1.6372 ± 0.0174 a |
| Group D(NAC) | 12.9667 ± 0.9463 a | 5.8012 ± 0.1915 c | 0.4413 ± 0.0038 b | 11.5667 ± 2.4074 ab | 1.5548 ± 0.0059 b |
Note: Values are means ± SE (Standard Error) of three replicates. Values followed by the same letter are not significantly different at a probability level of 0.05, as determined by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Parthenogenesis indicators in rotifer exposed to different treatment fluids of K. mikimotoi.
| Groups | The First Spawning Time | The Last Spawning Time | The Average Number of Eggs | The Average Number of Larvae | Hatchability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | 84.000 ± 0.001 a | 174.667 ± 11.624 c | 20.667 ± 2.404 b | 26.667 ± 3.712 b | 79.085 ± 10.519 b |
| Group B | 70.667 ± 1.333 b | 308.000 ± 16.000 a | 126.667 ± 15.560 a | 133.000 ± 15.822 a | 95.153 ± 1.850 a |
| Group C | 60.000 ± 4.619 c | 300.000 ± 16.653 ab | 135.667 ± 12.005 a | 142.667 ± 14.518 a | 95.384 ± 1.434 a |
| Group D | 56.000 ± 4.000 cd | 310.667 ± 17.487 a | 151.000 ± 18.717 a | 153.000 ± 19.088 a | 98.724 ± 0.308 a |
| Group E | 53.333 ± 1.333 cd | 284.000 ± 36.661 ab | 136.333 ± 20.731 a | 147.667 ± 17.629 a | 91.834 ± 4.234 a |
| Group F | 52.000 ± 2.309 d | 305.333 ± 26.667 a | 156.333 ± 17.130 a | 161.333 ± 15.836 a | 96.725 ± 2.170 a |
| Group A (NAC) | 60.000 ± 4.000 c | 316.000 ± 20.000 a | 33.667 ± 2.667 b | 38.000 ± 1.155 b | 88.397 ± 4.736 ab |
| Group B (NAC) | 54.667 ± 1.333 cd | 226.667 ± 7.055 bc | 148.667 ± 5.044 a | 156.333 ± 6.119 a | 95.187 ± 2.268 a |
| Group D (NAC) | 52.000 ± 2.309 d | 240.000 ± 16.000 b | 129.667 ± 6.692 a | 139.000 ± 2.082 a | 93.187 ± 3.407 a |
Note: Values are the means ± SE (Standard Error) of three replicates. Values followed by the same letter are not significantly different (at a probability level of 0.05), as determined by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 3The hemolytic activity of different treatment fluids on rabbit and mussel blood cells. **: means extremely significant difference (p < 0.01, n = 3).
The experimental conditions of different groups.
| Group | Definition | Treatment Conditions | Growth Phase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment group | Group A | Whole cell suspension | Plateau phase |
| Group B | Lysed cell suspension | Exponential phase | |
| Group C | Cell-free culture filtrates | Exponential phase | |
| Group D | Lysed cell suspension | Plateau phase | |
| Group E | Cell-free culture filtrates | Plateau phase | |
| Control group | Group F | Sterilized seawater |