Literature DB >> 30379633

Continuously updating one's predictions underlies successful interception.

Eli Brenner1, Jeroen B J Smeets1.   

Abstract

This paper reviews our understanding of the interception of moving objects. Interception is a demanding task that requires both spatial and temporal precision. The required precision must be achieved on the basis of imprecise and sometimes biased sensory information. We argue that people make precise interceptive movements by continuously adjusting their movements. Initial estimates of how the movement should progress can be quite inaccurate. As the movement evolves, the estimate of how the rest of the movement should progress gradually becomes more reliable as prediction is replaced by sensory information about the progress of the movement. The improvement is particularly important when things do not progress as anticipated. Constantly adjusting one's estimate of how the movement should progress combines the opportunity to move in a way that one anticipates will best meet the task demands with correcting for any errors in such anticipation. The fact that the ongoing movement might have to be adjusted can be considered when determining how to move, and any systematic anticipation errors can be corrected on the basis of the outcome of earlier actions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  catching; hitting; human; motion; prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30379633     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00517.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  8 in total

1.  Tactile facilitation during actual and mere expectation of object reception.

Authors:  Damian M Manzone; Luc Tremblay; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Interception of virtual throws reveals predictive skills based on the visual processing of throwing kinematics.

Authors:  Antonella Maselli; Paolo De Pasquale; Francesco Lacquaniti; Andrea d'Avella
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-09-24

3.  Looking away from a moving target does not disrupt the way in which the movement toward the target is guided.

Authors:  Clara Cámara; Joan López-Moliner; Eli Brenner; Cristina de la Malla
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The response to background motion: Characteristics of a movement stabilization mechanism.

Authors:  Emily M Crowe; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Flexible prediction of opponent motion with internal representation in interception behavior.

Authors:  Kazushi Tsutsui; Keisuke Fujii; Kazutoshi Kudo; Kazuya Takeda
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Having several options does not increase the time it takes to make a movement to an adequate end point.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.064

7.  The influences of target size and recent experience on the vigour of adjustments to ongoing movements.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Hidde Hardon; Ryan Moesman; Emily M Crowe; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 2.064

8.  Hand movements respond to any motion near the endpoint.

Authors:  Emily M Crowe; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 2.157

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.