Literature DB >> 30378753

Restructuring the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network contract to achieve policy coherence and infrastructure excellence.

Sommer E Gentry1,2, Dorry L Segev1,3.   

Abstract

The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) went up for competitive bid again this year, yet this contract has been held by only 1 entity since its inception. The OPTN's scope has grown steadily, and it now embraces several disparate missions: to operate the computing and coordination infrastructure that maintains waitlists and makes organ offers in priority order, to regulate transplant centers and organ procurement organizations, to follow and protect living donors, and to decide organ allocation policy in concert with the many voices of the transplant community. The contracting process and performance work statement continue to discourage both innovative approaches to the OPTN and competitive bids outside of United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), with evaluation criteria that either disqualify or strongly disadvantage new applicants. The performance work statement also emphasizes bureaucratic tasks while obligating the OPTN contractor to the specific committee structure that has impeded decision-making and tended to preserve the status quo in controversial matters. Finally, the UNOS computing infrastructure is antiquated and requires months to years to implement small changes. Restructuring the OPTN contract to separate the information technology requirements from the policy/regulatory responsibilities might allow more nimble and effective specialty contractors to offer their capabilities in service of the national transplant enterprise.
© 2018 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients (SRTR); United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS); editorial/personal viewpoint; ethics and public policy; law/legislation; organ allocation; organ procurement and allocation; organ procurement organization

Year:  2018        PMID: 30378753      PMCID: PMC6494733          DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  8 in total

1.  Better off living--the ethics of the new UNOS proposal for allocating kidneys for transplantation.

Authors:  Peter P Reese; Arthur L Caplan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  The history of trying to fix liver allocation: why a consensus approach will never work.

Authors:  Christopher B Hughes
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 2.863

Review 3.  Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: collecting, analyzing, and reporting data on transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Susan Leppke; Tabitha Leighton; David Zaun; Shu-Cheng Chen; Melissa Skeans; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder; Bertram L Kasiske
Journal:  Transplant Rev (Orlando)       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.943

4.  Potential Implications of Recent and Proposed Changes in the Regulatory Oversight of Solid Organ Transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  B L Kasiske; N Salkowski; A Wey; A K Israni; J J Snyder
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  From 6 years to 5 days for organ allocation policy change.

Authors:  Thomas M Egan
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  Why do we have the kidney allocation system we have today? A history of the 2014 kidney allocation system.

Authors:  Mark D Stegall; Peter G Stock; Kenneth Andreoni; John J Friedewald; Alan B Leichtman
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 2.850

7.  New Insights Into the Alleged Kidney Donor Profile Index Labeling Effect on Kidney Utilization.

Authors:  D E Stewart; V C Garcia; M I Aeder; D K Klassen
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Fair is fair: We must re-allocate livers for transplant.

Authors:  Brendan Parent; Arthur L Caplan
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.652

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  The impact of intense nursing care in improving anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with liver cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qiao Zhang; Rong Wan; Changdan Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 1.817

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.