Literature DB >> 30378733

How can we make better graphs? An initiative to increase the graphical expertise and productivity of quantitative scientists.

Marc Vandemeulebroecke1, Mark Baillie1, David Carr1, Linda Kanitra2, Alison Margolskee3, Andrew Wright1, Baldur Magnusson1.   

Abstract

Graphics are at the core of exploring and understanding data, communicating results and conclusions, and supporting decision-making. Increasing our graphical expertise can significantly strengthen our impact as professional statisticians and quantitative scientists. In this article, we present a concerted effort to improve the way we create graphics at Novartis. We provide our vision and guiding principles, before describing seven work packages in more detail. The actions, principles, and experiences laid out in this paper are applicable generally, also beyond drug development, which is our field of work. The purpose of this article is to share our experiences and help foster the use of good graphs in pharmaceutical statistics and beyond. A Graphics Principles "Cheat Sheet" is available online at https://graphicsprinciples.github.io/.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  good graphical principles; statistical communication; statistical graphics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30378733     DOI: 10.1002/pst.1912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Stat        ISSN: 1539-1604            Impact factor:   1.894


  2 in total

1.  Effective Visual Communication for the Quantitative Scientist.

Authors:  Marc Vandemeulebroecke; Mark Baillie; Alison Margolskee; Baldur Magnusson
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-30

2.  Data monitoring committees for clinical trials evaluating treatments of COVID-19.

Authors:  Tobias Mütze; Tim Friede
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 2.226

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.