Sandra Mühlstädt1, Alexander Friedl2, Roman Zachoval3, Nasreldin Mohammed4, André Schumann4, Gerit Theil4, Paolo Fornara4. 1. Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin Luther University, Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany. sandra.muehlstaedt@uk-halle.de. 2. Department of Urology, Hospital Göttlicher Heiland, Vienna, Austria. 3. Department of Urology and 1st and 3rd Medical Faculty, Thomayer Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. 4. Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin Luther University, Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We report the multicentre comparison of the different port types of the adjustable transobturator male incontinence system (ATOMS, A.M.I., Austria). METHODS: Between 10/09 and 10/16, 383 patients received an ATOMS. Of these, 63% received the inguinal port (IP, 2009-2013), 23% the intraoperative manually connectable scrotal port (SP, 2013-2015), and 14% the pre-connected fully silicone-covered scrotal port (SSP, 2014-2016). During the follow-up period, continence parameters, pain and quality of life ratings and postoperative port-associated complications were evaluated and compared. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 7®, p < 0.05 considered as significant. RESULTS: Regarding preoperative parameters (BMI, ASA score, previous radiotherapy/incontinence surgery, and preoperative 24-h pad count/24-h pad test), no significant differences were found. Regarding perioperative parameters, the mean operative time was significantly shorter for the SP and SSP (IP vs. SP p < 0.0001, IP vs. SSP p = 0.0048, SP vs. SSP p = 0.697). Comparison of the postoperative 24-h pad count, 24-h pad test and uroflowmetry data revealed no significant differences. However, the postoperative ICIQ-SF score was significantly better for the SSP (p = 0.0232) than the SP. A significant difference was also observed in postoperative port-associated complications. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, we identified one grade I and 29 grade IIIb complications for the IP, 1 grade I and 6 grade IIIb complications for the SP, but only 2 grade IIIb complications for the SSP (IP vs. SP p = 0.0231, IP vs. SSP p = 0.0189 and SP vs. SSP p = 0.0453). CONCLUSION: The SSP shows fewer complications while retaining comparable efficacy.
BACKGROUND: We report the multicentre comparison of the different port types of the adjustable transobturator male incontinence system (ATOMS, A.M.I., Austria). METHODS: Between 10/09 and 10/16, 383 patients received an ATOMS. Of these, 63% received the inguinal port (IP, 2009-2013), 23% the intraoperative manually connectable scrotal port (SP, 2013-2015), and 14% the pre-connected fully silicone-covered scrotal port (SSP, 2014-2016). During the follow-up period, continence parameters, pain and quality of life ratings and postoperative port-associated complications were evaluated and compared. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 7®, p < 0.05 considered as significant. RESULTS: Regarding preoperative parameters (BMI, ASA score, previous radiotherapy/incontinence surgery, and preoperative 24-h pad count/24-h pad test), no significant differences were found. Regarding perioperative parameters, the mean operative time was significantly shorter for the SP and SSP (IP vs. SP p < 0.0001, IP vs. SSP p = 0.0048, SP vs. SSP p = 0.697). Comparison of the postoperative 24-h pad count, 24-h pad test and uroflowmetry data revealed no significant differences. However, the postoperative ICIQ-SF score was significantly better for the SSP (p = 0.0232) than the SP. A significant difference was also observed in postoperative port-associated complications. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, we identified one grade I and 29 grade IIIb complications for the IP, 1 grade I and 6 grade IIIb complications for the SP, but only 2 grade IIIb complications for the SSP (IP vs. SP p = 0.0231, IP vs. SSP p = 0.0189 and SP vs. SSP p = 0.0453). CONCLUSION: The SSP shows fewer complications while retaining comparable efficacy.
Entities:
Keywords:
ATOMS; Artificial implants; Functionality; Male stress urinary incontinence; Port types
Authors: Alexander Friedl; Kathrin Stangl; Wilhelm Bauer; Danijel Kivaranovic; Jenifer Schneeweiss; Martin Susani; Stephan Hruby; Lukas Lusuardi; Fritz Lomoschitz; Edith Eisenhuber-Stadler; Wolfgang Schima; Clemens Brössner Journal: Urology Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Dragan Ilic; Sue M Evans; Christie Ann Allan; Jae Hung Jung; Declan Murphy; Mark Frydenberg Journal: BJU Int Date: 2017-11-17 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Javier C Angulo; Ignacio Arance; Antonio Ojea; Manuel Carballo; Andrés Rodríguez; Javier Pereira; Miguel Rebassa; Antoine Teyrouz; Gregorio Escribano; Fernando Teba; Blanca Madurga; Francisco E Martins; Francisco Cruz Journal: World J Urol Date: 2019-01-16 Impact factor: 4.226