Literature DB >> 30377624

Understanding the weather signal in national crop-yield variability.

Katja Frieler1, Bernhard Schauberger1, Almut Arneth2, Juraj Balkovic3,4, James Chryssanthacopoulos5, Delphine Deryng5,6, Joshua Elliott5,7, Christian Folberth3, Nikolay Khabarov3, Christoph Müller1, Stefan Olin8, Thomas A M Pugh2,9, Sibyll Schaphoff1, Jacob Schewe1, Erwin Schmid10, Lila Warszawski1, Anders Levermann1,11,12.   

Abstract

Year-to-year variations in crop yields can have major impacts on the livelihoods of subsistence farmers and may trigger significant global price fluctuations, with severe consequences for people in developing countries. Fluctuations can be induced by weather conditions, management decisions, weeds, diseases, and pests. Although an explicit quantification and deeper understanding of weather-induced crop-yield variability is essential for adaptation strategies, so far it has only been addressed by empirical models. Here we provide conservative estimates of the fraction of reported national yield variabilities that can be attributed to weather by state-of-the-art, process-based crop model simulations. We find that observed weather variations can explain more than 50% of the variability in wheat yields in Australia, Canada, Spain, Hungary, and Romania. For maize, weather sensitivities exceed 50% in seven countries, including the US. The explained variance exceeds 50% for rice in Japan and South Korea and for soy in Argentina. Avoiding water stress by simulating yields assuming full irrigation shows that water limitation is a major driver of the observed variations in most of these countries. Identifying the mechanisms leading to crop-yield fluctuations is not only fundamental for dampening fluctuations, but is also important in the context of the debate on the attribution of loss and damage to climate change. Since process-based crop models not only account for weather influences on crop yields, but also represent human-management measures, they could become essential tools for differentiating these drivers, and for exploring options to reduce future yield fluctuations.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 30377624      PMCID: PMC6204259          DOI: 10.1002/2016EF000525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Earths Future        ISSN: 2328-4277            Impact factor:   7.495


  8 in total

1.  Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production.

Authors:  Corey Lesk; Pedram Rowhani; Navin Ramankutty
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Integrating pests and pathogens into the climate change/food security debate.

Authors:  Peter J Gregory; Scott N Johnson; Adrian C Newton; John S I Ingram
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 6.992

3.  Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison.

Authors:  Cynthia Rosenzweig; Joshua Elliott; Delphine Deryng; Alex C Ruane; Christoph Müller; Almut Arneth; Kenneth J Boote; Christian Folberth; Michael Glotter; Nikolay Khabarov; Kathleen Neumann; Franziska Piontek; Thomas A M Pugh; Erwin Schmid; Elke Stehfest; Hong Yang; James W Jones
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate change.

Authors:  Wolfram Schlenker; Michael J Roberts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Climate trends and global crop production since 1980.

Authors:  David B Lobell; Wolfram Schlenker; Justin Costa-Roberts
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  How do various maize crop models vary in their responses to climate change factors?

Authors:  Simona Bassu; Nadine Brisson; Jean-Louis Durand; Kenneth Boote; Jon Lizaso; James W Jones; Cynthia Rosenzweig; Alex C Ruane; Myriam Adam; Christian Baron; Bruno Basso; Christian Biernath; Hendrik Boogaard; Sjaak Conijn; Marc Corbeels; Delphine Deryng; Giacomo De Sanctis; Sebastian Gayler; Patricio Grassini; Jerry Hatfield; Steven Hoek; Cesar Izaurralde; Raymond Jongschaap; Armen R Kemanian; K Christian Kersebaum; Soo-Hyung Kim; Naresh S Kumar; David Makowski; Christoph Müller; Claas Nendel; Eckart Priesack; Maria Virginia Pravia; Federico Sau; Iurii Shcherbak; Fulu Tao; Edmar Teixeira; Dennis Timlin; Katharina Waha
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 10.863

7.  Climate variation explains a third of global crop yield variability.

Authors:  Deepak K Ray; James S Gerber; Graham K MacDonald; Paul C West
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Consistent negative response of US crops to high temperatures in observations and crop models.

Authors:  Bernhard Schauberger; Sotirios Archontoulis; Almut Arneth; Juraj Balkovic; Philippe Ciais; Delphine Deryng; Joshua Elliott; Christian Folberth; Nikolay Khabarov; Christoph Müller; Thomas A M Pugh; Susanne Rolinski; Sibyll Schaphoff; Erwin Schmid; Xuhui Wang; Wolfram Schlenker; Katja Frieler
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 14.919

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Spatial variations in crop growing seasons pivotal to reproduce global fluctuations in maize and wheat yields.

Authors:  Jonas Jägermeyr; Katja Frieler
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 14.136

2.  Choosing multiple linear regressions for weather-based crop yield prediction with ABSOLUT v1.2 applied to the districts of Germany.

Authors:  Tobias Conradt
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Parameterization-induced uncertainties and impacts of crop management harmonization in a global gridded crop model ensemble.

Authors:  Christian Folberth; Joshua Elliott; Christoph Müller; Juraj Balkovič; James Chryssanthacopoulos; Roberto C Izaurralde; Curtis D Jones; Nikolay Khabarov; Wenfeng Liu; Ashwan Reddy; Erwin Schmid; Rastislav Skalský; Hong Yang; Almut Arneth; Philippe Ciais; Delphine Deryng; Peter J Lawrence; Stefan Olin; Thomas A M Pugh; Alex C Ruane; Xuhui Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.