| Literature DB >> 30377611 |
Leonardo Antunes Bellot de Souza1, Vinícius Magno da Rocha1, Max Rogerio Freitas Ramos1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the microfracture intervention with tibial valgus osteotomy associated in the treatment of varus gonarthrosis.Entities:
Keywords: Arthroscopy; Genu varum; Knee osteoarthritis; Lysholm knee score; Osteotomy
Year: 2018 PMID: 30377611 PMCID: PMC6204532 DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.08.023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Bras Ortop ISSN: 2255-4971
Sample selection criteria.
| Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
|---|---|
| Medial gonarthrosis | Advanced gonarthrosis |
| (Alhback 1 and 2) | (Alhback 3, 4, and 5) |
| Genu varum between 8° and 10° | Prior surgery in the joint |
| Range of motion >90° | Body mass index >35 kg/m2 |
| Age between 18 and 70 years | Injury of crossed ligaments |
Statistics used in Lysholm score analyses.
| Lysholm | Statistics | Isolated TVO group | TVO + microfracture group | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preop | 6th m | 12th m | 18th m | Preop | 6th m | 12th m | 18th m | ||
| Limping | Mean | 3.4 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 3.5 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Md. | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | ||
| Min. | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Max. | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | ||
| CV | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.27 | |
| Support | Mean | 4.8 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 4.8 | 4.1 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Md. | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1 | ||
| Min. | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| Max. | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| CV | 0.17 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.15 | 0.24 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.22 | |
| Locking | Mean | 7.3 | 14.2 | 14.3 | 14.2 | 8.6 | 13.9 | 13.9 | 13.7 |
| Md. | 6 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 15 | |
| 2.7 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.5 | ||
| Min. | 2 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |
| Max. | 10 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | |
| CV | 0.37 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.3 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.18 | |
| Instability | Mean | 17.1 | 23.8 | 23.8 | 23.8 | 18.5 | 23.1 | 23.1 | 23.1 |
| Md. | 20 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 20 | 25 | 25 | 25 | |
| 3.5 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.7 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.8 | ||
| Min. | 10 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| Max. | 20 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | |
| CV | 0.21 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 | |
| Pain | Mean | 13.2 | 21.7 | 21.8 | 21.7 | 13.3 | 19.7 | 19.3 | 19.2 |
| Md. | 15 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 15 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| 2.7 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 4 | 2.4 | 5.1 | 5.3 | 5.4 | ||
| Min. | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| Max. | 15 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 15 | 25 | 25 | 25 | |
| CV | 0.2 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.28 | |
| Swelling | Mean | 6.3 | 9.3 | 9.3 | 9.5 | 7.6 | 9.1 | 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Md. | 6 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| 2.9 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Min. | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| Max. | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| CV | 0.46 | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.33 | 0.2 | 0.23 | 0.23 | |
| Climbing stairs | Mean | 5.9 | 8.1 | 8.6 | 8.8 | 6 | 7.9 | 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Md. | 6 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| 0.7 | 2 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 0.76 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | ||
| Min. | 2 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| Max. | 6 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| CV | 0.11 | 0.25 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.13 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.28 | |
| Squatting | Mean | 3.3 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 3.5 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| Md. | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | ||
| Min. | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| Max. | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| CV | 0.34 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.26 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.17 | |
| Total value | Mean | 60.8 | 91.5 | 92.3 | 92.3 | 65.5 | 87.1 | 86.5 | 86.3 |
| Md. | 64 | 95 | 95 | 95 | 67 | 90 | 89 | 89 | |
| 7 | 7.7 | 8 | 8.8 | 5.2 | 12.1 | 12.7 | 12.8 | ||
| Min. | 46 | 65 | 65 | 62 | 51 | 48 | 48 | 50 | |
| Max. | 70 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 73 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| CV | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.15 | |
σ, standard deviation; CV, coefficient of variance; m, month; Max., maximum value; Md., median; Min., minimum value.
Comparison of the means of the Lysholm score in the postoperative period by the Mann–Whitney test.
| Lysholm scale domains | 6th month | 12th month | 18th month |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0.059 | 0.059 | 0.261 | |
| 0.579 | 0.329 | 0.297 | |
| 0.659 | 0.539 | 0.539 | |
| 0.023 | 0.006 | 0.006 | |
| 0.637 | 0.066 | 0.007 | |
| 0.713 | 0.329 | 0.159 | |
| 0.024 | 0.009 | 0.018 | |
| Total score | 0.022 | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Fig. 1Comparison between groups in the postoperative period.
*Statistically significant differences by the Mann–Whitney test.
Distribution of categorical frequencies between the 6th and 12th months in the isolated TVO group.
| First evaluation (6th month) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Second evaluation (12th month) | ||||
| 39 | 0 | 0 | 39 | |
| 53.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 53.40% | |
| 6 | 17 | 1 | 24 | |
| 8.20% | 23.30% | 1.40% | 32.90% | |
| 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | |
| 0.00% | 0.00% | 13.70% | 13.70% | |
| 45 | 17 | 11 | 73 | |
| 61.60% | 23.30% | 15.10% | 100.00% | |
Distribution of categorical frequencies between the 6th and 12th months in the TVO + microfracture group.
| First evaluation (6th month) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Second evaluation (12th month) | |||||
| 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | |
| 33.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 33.90% | |
| 1 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 26 | |
| 1.80% | 35.70% | 8.90% | 0.00% | 46.40% | |
| 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | |
| 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.50% | 0.00% | 12.50% | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | |
| 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.20% | 7.20% | |
| 20 | 20 | 12 | 4 | 56 | |
| 35.70% | 35.70% | 21.40% | 7.20% | 100.00% | |