| Literature DB >> 30377601 |
Ricardo Kaempf de Oliveira1,2, Fabiano da Silva Marques1, Rafael Pegas Praetzel1,2, Leohnard Roger Bayer1,2, Pedro Jose Delgado3, Samuel Ribak4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the results of the surgical treatment of patients with congenital arthrogryposis with wrist deformity through biplanar carpal wedge osteotomy.Entities:
Keywords: Arthrogryposis/surgery; Arthrogryposis/therapy; Orthopedic procedures/methods; Osteotomy/utilization
Year: 2018 PMID: 30377601 PMCID: PMC6205020 DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.08.026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Bras Ortop ISSN: 2255-4971
Fig. 1Male patient, 4 years, with arthrogryposis and severe deformity in flexion and ulnar deviation of the wrist (A). He uses the back of the wrist and hand to help in locomotion and presents a local callus (white arrow) (B and C). Radiograph of the wrist shows no bone changes (D). Preoperative mobility of 35° (E and F).
Fig. 2Intracarpal osteotomy planning for correction of the deformity in flexion and ulnar deviation of the wrist in arthrogryposis. The first cut is made on the proximal row of the carpus, immediately distal to the radiocarpal joint and perpendicular to the two axes of the forearm. The second, more distal cut is made on the distal row perpendicular to the two long axes of the metacarpals (A and B). After the bone wedge is resected, the defect is closed and the hand is repositioned radially and dorsally, achieving the position planned preoperatively (C and D).
Fig. 3Intracarpal osteotomy of the wrist in arthrogryposis. Proximal and distal cuts (A). Wedge resection(B). Correction of deformity (C). Fixation using retrograde cross-linked Kirschner wires (D).
Series of patients who underwent intracarpal osteotomy for the correction of flexion deformity and ulnar deviation of the wrist in arthrogryposis.
| Gender | Age | Side | Initial position Flexion at rest | Final position Flexion at rest | Type of fixation | Support on the back of the hand | Follow-up (months) | Time until union (weeks) | Pre-operative active mobility | Post-operative active mobility | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 3 y + 3 m | L | 45° | 5° | Kirschner wires | No | 132 | 7 | 40° | 30° |
| 2 | M | 4 y + 5 m | R | 110° | 20° | Kirschner wires | Yes | 120 | 6 | 25° | 20° |
| 3 | M | 5 y + 10 m | L | 85° | 15° | Kirschner wires | Yes | 96 | 6 | 30° | 25° |
| 4 | M | 4 y + 1 m | R | 90° | 0° | Kirschner wires | Yes | 120 | 6 | 35° | 30° |
| 5 | F | 5 y + 1 m | L | 60° | 5° | Kirschner wires | No | 108 | 7 | 30° | 20° |
| 6 | F | 6 y + 2 m | R | 60° | 10° | Kirschner wires | No | 132 | 5 | 25° | 20° |
| 7 | F | 7 y + 3 m | L | 50° | 15° | Kirschner wires | No | 120 | 6 | 35° | 30° |
| 8 | M | 5 y + 3 m | R | 105 | 0° | Cerclage | Yes | 48 | 5 | 40° | 30° |
| 9 | M | 6 y + 6 m | L | 85° | 10° | Cerclage | Yes | 60 | 6 | 35° | 30° |
| 10 | F | 8 y + 1 m | R | 70° | 50° | Kirschner wires | No | 108 | 5 | 40° | 25° |
| 11 | F | 5 y + 6 m | L | 40° | 0° | Cerclage | No | 60 | 7 | 45° | 35° |
| 12 | F | 6 y + 11 m | R | 70° | 15° | Cerclage | No | 60 | 6 | 40° | 25° |
| Mean | 6♂ | 5 y + 8 m | 6 R | 72.5° | 12° | Kirschner wires 08 | No 7 | 97 | 5.7 | 35° | 26.6° |
| 6♀ | 6 L | Cerclage 4 | Yes 5 |
Fig. 4Results at 120 months of follow-up. Good mobility of the fingers and 30° of active mobility of the wrist (A and B). Radiographs show good alignment and coalitions in the mediocarpal joint at the osteotomy site (C and D).
Fig. 5The mean active mobility in the preoperative period was 35° (A). The mean active mobility in the late postoperative period was 26.6° (B). This slight loss in active mobility is justified by the fact that the wrist became more functional, as it is closer to the neutral position.