Meghana D Gadgil1, Samantha F Ehrlich2, Yeyi Zhu3, Susan D Brown3, Monique M Hedderson3, Yvonne Crites4, Assiamira Ferrara3. 1. 1 Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California , San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 2. 2 Department of Public Health, University of Tennessee Knoxville , Knoxville, Tennessee. 3. 3 Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California , Oakland, California. 4. 4 Division of Perinatology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center , Santa Clara, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE:Poor dietary quality, measured by the Healthy Eating Index 2010 (HEI-2010), is associated with risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and type 2 diabetes. The aim was to investigate the association between dietary quality and glycemic control in women with GDM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 1220 women with GDM. Dietary quality was calculated by HEI-2010 score from a Food Frequency Questionnaire administered shortly after GDM diagnosis; higher scores indicate higher dietary quality. Subsequent glycemic control was defined as ≥80% of all capillary glucose measurements meeting recommended clinical targets below 95 mg/dL for fasting, and below 140 mg/dL 1-hour glucose after meals. RESULTS: As compared with Quartile 1 of HEI-2010 score, Quartiles 2, 3, and 4 showed increased adjusted odds of overall optimal glycemic control (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.90 [1.34-2.70], 1.77 [1.25-2.52], and 1.55 [1.09-2.20], respectively). Increased odds of glycemic control were observed in Quartiles 2, 3, and 4 as compared with Quartile 1 of HEI-2010 score for 1-hour postbreakfast and 1-hour postdinner. Mean capillary glucose was lower in Quartiles 2, 3, and 4 of HEI-2010 score when compared with Quartile 1 for 1-hour postdinner (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware that even a small improvement in diet quality may be beneficial for the achievement of improved glycemic control in women with GDM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov number, NCT01344278.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: Poor dietary quality, measured by the Healthy Eating Index 2010 (HEI-2010), is associated with risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and type 2 diabetes. The aim was to investigate the association between dietary quality and glycemic control in women with GDM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 1220 women with GDM. Dietary quality was calculated by HEI-2010 score from a Food Frequency Questionnaire administered shortly after GDM diagnosis; higher scores indicate higher dietary quality. Subsequent glycemic control was defined as ≥80% of all capillary glucose measurements meeting recommended clinical targets below 95 mg/dL for fasting, and below 140 mg/dL 1-hour glucose after meals. RESULTS: As compared with Quartile 1 of HEI-2010 score, Quartiles 2, 3, and 4 showed increased adjusted odds of overall optimal glycemic control (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.90 [1.34-2.70], 1.77 [1.25-2.52], and 1.55 [1.09-2.20], respectively). Increased odds of glycemic control were observed in Quartiles 2, 3, and 4 as compared with Quartile 1 of HEI-2010 score for 1-hour postbreakfast and 1-hour postdinner. Mean capillary glucose was lower in Quartiles 2, 3, and 4 of HEI-2010 score when compared with Quartile 1 for 1-hour postdinner (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware that even a small improvement in diet quality may be beneficial for the achievement of improved glycemic control in women with GDM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov number, NCT01344278.
Authors: Patricia M Guenther; Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Jill Reedy; Susan M Krebs-Smith; Dennis W Buckman; Kevin W Dodd; Kellie O Casavale; Raymond J Carroll Journal: J Nutr Date: 2014-01-22 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Robert G Moses; Shelly A Casey; Eleanor G Quinn; Jane M Cleary; Linda C Tapsell; Marianna Milosavljevic; Peter Petocz; Jennie C Brand-Miller Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Patricia M Guenther; Kellie O Casavale; Jill Reedy; Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Hazel A B Hiza; Kevin J Kuczynski; Lisa L Kahle; Susan M Krebs-Smith Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: A L B Shapiro; J L Kaar; T L Crume; A P Starling; A M Siega-Riz; B M Ringham; D H Glueck; J M Norris; L A Barbour; J E Friedman; D Dabelea Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2016-05-02 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Elizabeth Thom; Marshall W Carpenter; Susan M Ramin; Brian Casey; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; Dwight J Rouse; John M Thorp; Anthony Sciscione; Patrick Catalano; Margaret Harper; George Saade; Kristine Y Lain; Yoram Sorokin; Alan M Peaceman; Jorge E Tolosa; Garland B Anderson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-10-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Stefanie N Hinkle; Mengying Li; Jagteshwar Grewal; Samrawit F Yisahak; William A Grobman; Roger B Newman; Deborah A Wing; Katherine L Grantz; Cuilin Zhang Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2021-05-19 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Vanessa Averof Honorato de Almeida; Rafaela Alkmin da Costa; Cristiane de Freitas Paganoti; Fernanda Cristina Mikami; Ana Maria da Silva Sousa; Stela Verzinhasse Peres; Marco Antonio Borges Lopes; Rossana Pulcineli Vieira Francisco Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-05-28 Impact factor: 5.717