| Literature DB >> 30376374 |
Jason D Merker1, Kelly Devereaux1, A John Iafrate1, Suzanne Kamel-Reid1, Annette S Kim1, Joel T Moncur1, Stephen B Montgomery1, Rakesh Nagarajan1, Bryce P Portier1, Mark J Routbort1, Craig Smail1, Lea F Surrey1, Patricia Vasalos1, Alexander J Lazar1, Neal I Lindeman1.
Abstract
CONTEXT.—: Next-generation sequencing-based assays are being increasingly used in the clinical setting for the detection of somatic variants in solid tumors, but limited data are available regarding the interlaboratory performance of these assays. OBJECTIVE.—: To examine proficiency testing data from the initial College of American Pathologists (CAP) Next-Generation Sequencing Solid Tumor survey to report on laboratory performance. DESIGN.—: CAP proficiency testing results from 111 laboratories were analyzed for accuracy and associated assay performance characteristics. RESULTS.—: The overall accuracy observed for all variants was 98.3%. Rare false-negative results could not be attributed to sequencing platform, selection method, or other assay characteristics. The median and average of the variant allele fractions reported by the laboratories were within 10% of those orthogonally determined by digital polymerase chain reaction for each variant. The median coverage reported at the variant sites ranged from 1922 to 3297. CONCLUSIONS.—: Laboratories demonstrated an overall accuracy of greater than 98% with high specificity when examining 10 clinically relevant somatic single-nucleotide variants with a variant allele fraction of 15% or greater. These initial data suggest excellent performance, but further ongoing studies are needed to evaluate the performance of lower variant allele fractions and additional variant types.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30376374 PMCID: PMC6910717 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0336-CP
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med ISSN: 0003-9985 Impact factor: 5.534