Susana Magallón1, Luna L Sánchez-Reyes2, Sandra L Gómez-Acevedo1. 1. Departamento de Botánica, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 3er Circuito de Ciudad Universitaria, Del. Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México. 2. Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 3er Circuito de Ciudad Universitaria, Del. Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: As angiosperms became one of the megadiverse groups of macroscopic eukaryotes, they forged modern ecosystems and promoted the evolution of extant terrestrial biota. Unequal distribution of species among lineages suggests that diversification, the process that ultimately determines species richness, acted differentially through angiosperm evolution. METHODS: We investigate how angiosperms became megadiverse by identifying the phylogenetic and temporal placement of exceptional radiations, by combining the most densely fossil-calibrated molecular clock phylogeny with a Bayesian model that identifies diversification shifts among evolutionary lineages and through time. We evaluate the effect of the prior number of expected shifts in the phylogenetic tree. KEY RESULTS: Major diversification increases took place over 100 Ma, from the Early Cretaceous to the end of the Paleogene, and are distributed across the angiosperm phylogeny. The long-term diversification trajectory of angiosperms shows moderate rate variation, but is underlain by increasing speciation and extinction, and results from temporally overlapping, independent radiations and depletions in component lineages. CONCLUSIONS: The identified deep time diversification shifts are clues to the identification of ultimate drivers of angiosperm megadiversity, which probably involve multivariate interactions among intrinsic traits and extrinsic forces. An enhanced understanding of angiosperm diversification will involve a more precise phylogenetic location of diversification shifts, and integration of fossil information.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: As angiosperms became one of the megadiverse groups of macroscopic eukaryotes, they forged modern ecosystems and promoted the evolution of extant terrestrial biota. Unequal distribution of species among lineages suggests that diversification, the process that ultimately determines species richness, acted differentially through angiosperm evolution. METHODS: We investigate how angiosperms became megadiverse by identifying the phylogenetic and temporal placement of exceptional radiations, by combining the most densely fossil-calibrated molecular clock phylogeny with a Bayesian model that identifies diversification shifts among evolutionary lineages and through time. We evaluate the effect of the prior number of expected shifts in the phylogenetic tree. KEY RESULTS: Major diversification increases took place over 100 Ma, from the Early Cretaceous to the end of the Paleogene, and are distributed across the angiosperm phylogeny. The long-term diversification trajectory of angiosperms shows moderate rate variation, but is underlain by increasing speciation and extinction, and results from temporally overlapping, independent radiations and depletions in component lineages. CONCLUSIONS: The identified deep time diversification shifts are clues to the identification of ultimate drivers of angiosperm megadiversity, which probably involve multivariate interactions among intrinsic traits and extrinsic forces. An enhanced understanding of angiosperm diversification will involve a more precise phylogenetic location of diversification shifts, and integration of fossil information.
Authors: Matthew P Nelsen; Robert Lücking; C Kevin Boyce; H Thorsten Lumbsch; Richard H Ree Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Andrew J Helmstetter; Sylvain Glemin; Jos Käfer; Rosana Zenil-Ferguson; Hervé Sauquet; Hugo de Boer; Léo-Paul M J Dagallier; Nathan Mazet; Eliette L Reboud; Thomas L P Couvreur; Fabien L Condamine Journal: Syst Biol Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 9.160
Authors: William J Baker; Paul Bailey; Vanessa Barber; Abigail Barker; Sidonie Bellot; David Bishop; Laura R Botigué; Grace Brewer; Tom Carruthers; James J Clarkson; Jeffrey Cook; Robyn S Cowan; Steven Dodsworth; Niroshini Epitawalage; Elaine Françoso; Berta Gallego; Matthew G Johnson; Jan T Kim; Kevin Leempoel; Olivier Maurin; Catherine Mcginnie; Lisa Pokorny; Shyamali Roy; Malcolm Stone; Eduardo Toledo; Norman J Wickett; Alexandre R Zuntini; Wolf L Eiserhardt; Paul J Kersey; Ilia J Leitch; Félix Forest Journal: Syst Biol Date: 2022-02-10 Impact factor: 15.683
Authors: François Lutzoni; Michael D Nowak; Michael E Alfaro; Valérie Reeb; Jolanta Miadlikowska; Michael Krug; A Elizabeth Arnold; Louise A Lewis; David L Swofford; David Hibbett; Khidir Hilu; Timothy Y James; Dietmar Quandt; Susana Magallón Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-12-21 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Jennifer R Mandel; Rebecca B Dikow; Carolina M Siniscalchi; Ramhari Thapa; Linda E Watson; Vicki A Funk Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 11.205