Literature DB >> 30375714

Echocardiographic right ventricular strain from multiple apical views is superior for assessment of right ventricular systolic function.

A Werther Evaldsson1, A Ingvarsson1, J G Smith1, G Rådegran1, A Roijer1, J Waktare2, E Ostenfeld3, C Meurling1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) systolic function is an important determinant of outcome in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). Conventional echocardiographic measures of RV are mainly based on longitudinal contractility. Recently, measurement of RV global longitudinal strain derived from multiple windows (RVGLS) has emerged as an option but has not been well evaluated. The aim of the present study was to evaluate which echocardiographic RV function parameter correlates best with RV ejection fraction derived from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (RVEFCMR ). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Fifty-five patients evaluated for PH underwent RV assessment with echocardiography and CMR. Conventional echocardiographic parameters of RV function including tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), tricuspid annular systolic velocity (S'), RV fractional area change (RVFAC) and RV index of myocardial performance (RIMP). RVGLS was measured from three separate apical views using a 17-segment model and strain from the lateral free wall was calculated separately (RVfree). The study included 55 patients, whereas assessment of RVGLS could be obtained in 29 patients. The Pearson correlation coefficient with RVEFCMR was strong for RVGLS (r = 0·814, P<0·001) and RVfree (r = 0·778, P<0·001), modest for RVFAC (r = 0·681, P<0·001), TAPSE (r = 0·592, P<0·001) and RIMP (r=-0·521, P<0·01), and weak for S' (r = 0·385, P<0·01).
CONCLUSION: The echocardiographic RV measures, RVGLS and RVfree correlated well with RVEFCMR , whereas correlation with TAPSE, RIMP and S' was unsatisfactory. Our findings suggest that RVGLS and RVfree are the preferred echocardiographic methods for clinical practice. RVfree is easiest to perform but RVGLS could provide incremental value in selected patients.
© 2018 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  right ventricular bullseye plot; right ventricular ejection fraction; right ventricular global longitudinal strain; right ventricular systolic function; speckle tracking

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30375714     DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging        ISSN: 1475-0961            Impact factor:   2.273


  4 in total

1.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of right ventricular eccentricity index in pulmonary artery hypertension.

Authors:  Lili Wang; Xiaoling Chen; Ke Wan; Chao Gong; Weihao Li; Yuanwei Xu; Jie Wang; Juan He; Bi Wen; Yuchi Han; Rui Zeng; Yucheng Chen
Journal:  Pulm Circ       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.017

2.  Assessment of right ventricular function using cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Yongning Shang; Yulin Zhang; Weiling Leng; Xiaotian Lei; Liu Chen; Xiaoyue Zhou; Ziwen Liang; Jian Wang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-02

3.  Influence of Right Ventricular Dysfunction on Outcomes of Left Ventricular Non-compaction Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Wuwan Wang; Wei Chen; Xue Lin; Ligang Fang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-31

4.  Right ventricular function parameters in pulmonary hypertension: echocardiography vs. cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Anna Werther Evaldsson; Anthony Lindholm; Raluca Jumatate; Annika Ingvarsson; Gustav Jan Smith; Johan Waktare; Göran Rådegran; Anders Roijer; Carl Meurling; Ellen Ostenfeld
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.298

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.