Literature DB >> 30375525

Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Treatment Naïve Rheumatoid Arthritis and Correlation With Disease Parameters.

Purneshwar Kumar Pandey1, Abhijit Swami1, Tanuj Kumar Biswas1, Riturag Thakuria1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in treatment naïve rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in an Indian population and correlate RA disease characteristics with presence of MetS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 84 RA patients (18 males, 66 females; mean age 44.8±12.5 years; range 18 to 72 years) diagnosed according to 2010 American College of Rheumatology-European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria who were treatment naïve or did not receive disease modifying antirheumatic drugs for more than six weeks and 120 age and sex-matched apparently healthy controls (35 males, 85 females; mean age 44.1±12.7 years; range 18 to 75 years). The frequency of MetS was assessed using National Cholesterol Education Program- Adult Treatment Panel III 2004 revised criteria. Patients were also assessed in terms of disease activity, using disease activity score 28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of MetS in RA.
RESULTS: Metabolic syndrome was found in 39.28% of RA group and 20% of control group according to National Cholesterol Education Program- Adult Treatment Panel III 2004 (p<0.005). MetS was most commonly detected in the 51 to 60 age group (65%). RA group was significantly more likely to have low high-density lipoprotein (63.09%), high triglyceride (53.57%), elevated blood pressure (41.66%) levels, and elevated waist circumference (38.09%). In RA group, disease activity score 28 (odds ratio: 6.51, confidence interval: 1.19-35.46 p=0.03), C-reactive protein (odds ratio: 1.13, confidence interval: 1.05-1.21 p<0.001), and duration of disease (odds ratio: 1.82, confidence interval: 1.04-3.18 p=0.03) remained independent predictors for presence of MetS in RA.
CONCLUSION: The frequency of MetS was higher in RA group compared to control group. Higher systemic inflammatory marker, disease duration, and disease activity score 28 remained independent predictors associated with presence of MetS. These findings suggest that RA patients should be screened early for presence of MetS to check for and reduce risk of atherosclerotic vascular diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disease activity; metabolic syndrome; rheumatoid arthritis

Year:  2016        PMID: 30375525      PMCID: PMC6190937          DOI: 10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2017.5949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Rheumatol        ISSN: 2148-5046            Impact factor:   1.472


  26 in total

Review 1.  The metabolic syndrome: the crossroads between rheumatoid arthritis and cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Elisa Gremese; Gianfranco Ferraccioli
Journal:  Autoimmun Rev       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 9.754

Review 2.  The metabolic syndrome: time for a critical appraisal: joint statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.

Authors:  Richard Kahn; John Buse; Ele Ferrannini; Michael Stern
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Metabolic syndrome and subclinical atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Patrick H Dessein; Milton Tobias; Martin G Veller
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  High incidence of cardiovascular events in a rheumatoid arthritis cohort not explained by traditional cardiac risk factors.

Authors:  I D del Rincón; K Williams; M P Stern; G L Freeman; A Escalante
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-12

5.  Lipid profile in Tunisian patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Saoussen Hassen Zrour; Fadoua Hassine Neffeti; Nabil Sakly; Mahbouba Jguirim; Wided Korbaa; Mohamed Younes; Ismail Bejia; Mongi Touzi; Najjar Mohamed Fadel; Naceur Bergaoui
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Metabolic syndrome in South Asian immigrants: more than low HDL requiring aggressive management.

Authors:  Sunita Dodani; Rebecca Henkhaus; Jo Wick; James Vacek; Kamal Gupta; Lei Dong; Merlin G Butler
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Metabolic syndrome in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Manole Cojocaru; Inimioara Mihaela Cojocaru; Isabela Silosi; Camelia Doina Vrabie
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2012-06

8.  The influence of age and body mass index on the metabolic syndrome and its components.

Authors:  C M Alexander; P B Landsman; S M Grundy
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 6.577

9.  Atherogenic lipid profile is a feature characteristic of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: effect of early treatment--a prospective, controlled study.

Authors:  Athanasios N Georgiadis; Eleni C Papavasiliou; Evangelia S Lourida; Yannis Alamanos; Christina Kostara; Alexandros D Tselepis; Alexandros A Drosos
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  Rheumatoid cachexia is associated with dyslipidemia and low levels of atheroprotective natural antibodies against phosphorylcholine but not with dietary fat in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ann-Charlotte Elkan; Niclas Håkansson; Johan Frostegård; Tommy Cederholm; Ingiäld Hafström
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  2 in total

1.  Metabolic Syndrome and Atherogenic Indices in Rheumatoid Arthritis and their Relationship with Disease Activity: A Hospital-based Study from Northeast India.

Authors:  Prasanta Kumar Bhattacharya; Bhupen Barman; Md Jamil; Kaustubh Bora
Journal:  J Transl Int Med       Date:  2020-06-30

2.  Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wei Cai; Xuemi Tang; Min Pang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.