Literature DB >> 30374924

Clinical Impact of the Location of Lymph Node Metastases After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer.

Hiroshi Miyata1,2, Keijirou Sugimura3, Makoto Yamasaki4, Tomoki Makino4, Koji Tanaka4, Eiichi Morii5, Takeshi Omori3, Kazuyoshi Yamamoto3, Yoshitomo Yanagimoto3, Masahiko Yano3, Shinichi Nakatsuka6, Masaki Mori4, Yuichiro Doki4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the current cancer staging systems, the location of lymph node (LN) metastases is not considered, although LN status is defined according to the number of LN metastases.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the clinical impact of the location of LN metastases in esophageal cancer and to evaluate the relevance of minimizing the extent of lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant therapy.
METHODS: In 561 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the therapeutic value of each LN dissection was estimated by multiplying the incidence of metastasis by the 5-year survival rate of patients with positive nodes. In addition, we examined whether the value was affected by the response to neoadjuvant therapy.
RESULTS: Metastasis to the celiac LN and middle mediastinal LN regions was identified as an independent prognostic factor by multivariate analysis, together with the number of LN metastases; however metastasis to the cervical LN and upper mediastinal LN regions was not identified as an independent prognostic factor. The therapeutic value was high in recurrent nerve LNs, paraesophageal LNs, paracardial LNs, and left gastric LNs. The therapeutic value for each LN dissection did not change according to the response to neoadjuvant therapy, excluding the lower mediastinal LN and perigastric LN stations for which the value was relatively high in patients with a poor response.
CONCLUSION: The present study shows that the location and number of LN metastases have a prognostic impact in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Limited lymphadenectomy according to the response to neoadjuvant therapy cannot be justified.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal cancer; Esophagectomy; Lymph node; Metastasis; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Neoadjuvant therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30374924     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6946-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  5 in total

1.  Does the lymph node yield affect survival in patients with esophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy plus esophagectomy? A systematic review and updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Donglai Chen; Yiming Mao; Yuhang Xue; Yonghua Sang; Desen Liu; Yongbing Chen
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-07-31

2.  [Association of adenylate cyclase-associated protein 2 expression with histopathology and long-term prognosis of gastric cancer].

Authors:  Sitang Ge; Shan Wang; Wujun Xiang; Lili Wang; Yuke Zhu; Xiang Zhu; Xun Wang; Lugen Zuo; Congqiao Jiang; Siqing Li; Mulin Liu
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-09-30

3.  Retrieved lymph nodes from different anatomic groups in gastric cancer: a proposed optimal number, comparison with other nodal classification strategies and its impact on prognosis.

Authors:  Siwei Pan; Pengliang Wang; Yanan Xing; Kai Li; Zhenning Wang; Huimian Xu; Zhi Zhu
Journal:  Cancer Commun (Lond)       Date:  2019-09-13

4.  Minimally invasive oesophagectomy with a total two-field lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus: A prospective study.

Authors:  Kuppusamy Sasikumar; Raja Kalayarasan; Senthil Gnanasekaran; Sandip Chandrasekar; Biju Pottakkat
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

5.  Thoracoscopic radical esophagectomy combined with left inferior pulmonary ligament lymphadenectomy for esophageal carcinoma via the right thoracic approach: A single-center retrospective study of 30 cases.

Authors:  Shijie Huang; Tianbao Yang; Wu Wang; Guozhong Huang; Boyang Chen; Pengfei Chen; Douli Ke; Wenhua Huang; Jinbiao Xie
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.