Literature DB >> 30374485

An unusual complication of posterior packing in epistaxis.

Mehmet Ozgur Erdogan1, Engin Ozturk2, Baris Erdogan3, Mustafa Ahmet Afacan1, Ismail Tayfur1, Kaan Yusufoglu4, Sahin Colak1, Abdullah Algin5.   

Abstract

Endonasal or transnasal procedures are sometimes necessary in patients with head trauma. Before these procedures, the integrity of the skull base must be considered to avoid penetration of the cranial vault. A 54-year-old man was taken to a district hospital following a car accident. After the initial assessment and emergency treatment, he was transferred to our emergency clinic for further examination. The patient had massive nasal bleeding, though a Foley catheter had been inserted to control posterior bleeding. Computed tomography (CT) revealed that the catheter was not positioned correctly and was in the cranial vault. Several fractures of the maxillofacial and cranial bones and cervical vertebrae were detected on CT. He also had right hemothorax and bilateral brain contusions. Endonasal insertion of catheters or tubes in trauma patients without a complete assessment of the skull base can cause serious complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cathater; complication; epistaxis; trauma

Year:  2018        PMID: 30374485      PMCID: PMC6191550          DOI: 10.14744/nci.2017.75547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  North Clin Istanb        ISSN: 2536-4553


In patients with head trauma, nasal bleeding can sometimes be massive and can lead to increased morbidity and mortality [1]. Endonasal or transnasal procedures might be necessary to stop bleeding [2, 3]. However, before performing these procedures, the integrity of the skull base must be assessed to avoid penetration of the cranial vault. The application of a nasogastric tube, nasal intubation, or posterior packing for severe nasal bleeding can cause penetration of the skull base and severe or even deadly injuries [1]. After the resuscitative measures are undertaken, stopping a major bleeding becomes the first aspect to look into in a trauma patient. Yet, before making an intervention, the physician must be sure of the condition of the skull base [1]. In this case report, we present a complication that occurred as a result of inadequate assessment of the skull base before intervention. A detailed discussion of the complication and treatment options is provided with it.

CASE REPORT

A 54-year-old man with multiple maxillofacial, cervical, and thoracic injuries and deterioration of mental status due to a car/pedestrian accident was transferred to our emergency department (ED) from a district hospital. The patient’s Glasgow score was 10 at referral from the district hospital. He had massive nasal bleeding. In the first hospital, it could not be stopped with anterior nasal packing; thus, a 14-French Foley catheter was used to pack the posterior nose. This did not stop the bleeding either; thus, the patient was transferred to our ED for further evaluation. When initially examined in our ED, the patient’s Glasgow score was 10. He was confused and had multiple lacerations of different depths in the face. He also had massive epistaxis and tachypnea. After the initial assessment, routine laboratory tests and maxillofacial, cranial, cervical, and thoracic computed tomographies (CTs) of the patient were obtained. He had frontal bone, anterior cranial base, and bilateral orbital roof fractures along with nasal bone and C4 and C7 vertebrae fractures. He had bilateral frontal contusions and right hemothorax. A massive air bubble was detected inside the brain parenchyma, which was the Foley catheter balloon that was meant to stop the nasal bleeding (Figs. 1, 2). The balloon was deflated slowly, and the Foley catheter was removed by a neurosurgeon. The posterior nasopharynx was packed with gauze via the mouth and supported with anterior nasal packing, which successfully stopped the bleeding. Chest-tube drainage was initiated. Three units of erythrocytes and fresh frozen plasma were transfused. After completing emergency interventions, the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit for a close follow-up.
Figure 1

Foley catheter in the cranial vault.

Figure 2

Foley catheter in the cranial vault.

Foley catheter in the cranial vault. Foley catheter in the cranial vault.

DISCUSSION

In multiple trauma patients, epistaxis can be a major problem, which might be underestimated or overlooked but can be life threatening. Several arteries from both the internal and external carotid systems supply blood to the nose. The arteries that are usually involved in epistaxis are the internal maxillary, facial, and ophthalmic arteries [1], but any artery could be involved in a patient with maxillofacial trauma. Rupture of any of these arteries can cause life-threatening, massive hemorrhages. Stopping the bleeding can be challenging, as observed in our case, and anterior packing is not always sufficient. Methods to treat epistaxis vary [2] and range from slight pressure on the nasal ala to arterial embolization or surgical ligation [3]. Posterior nasal packing is another technique, which is less invasive than angiographic or surgical methods but should be applied with great caution, particularly in patients with maxillofacial fractures. Our patient had massive nasal bleeding that could not be stopped by anterior packing, and the otolaryngologist’s attempt to stop the bleeding with posterior packing failed because of the defect in the anterior skull base. We recommend using nasal endoscopy to place the Foley catheter. A method in which a nasogastric tube is sutured to a flexible bronchoscope and passed into the nasal cavity under direct visualization has been described [4]. The bronchoscope is pulled out of the mouth, the suture is cut, and then the tube is pulled back. This method could be applied to posterior packing with a Foley catheter. Nasal intubation or nasogastric tube insertion should be avoided in patients with a suspected anterior skull base fracture [1]. Endonasal procedures confer a risk of violating the cranial vault [5]. Despite the fact that Foley catheters are not designed for stopping nasal bleeding, they have been use for this purpose for a long time [6]. Their applicability due to their flexibility is a reason to choose them for posterior packing of the nasal cavity. Although they have been widely used for a long time, only a few cases of intracranial penetration have been reported. In a literature review about traumatic epistaxis, only 5 of the 33 cases reported to have intracranial penetration of applied instruments were found to be Foley catheters [7]. The rest were nasogastric tubes. The major site for penetration was found to be the cribriform plate. In our case, cribriform plate was also the site of intracranial penetration. This site is more vulnerable to fractures than the other parts of the cranial base because the bony structure of the ethmoid bone is made up of thin lamellar bones. The tiny bony septae can be easily penetrated by application of minor forces. We report a case in which transnasal posterior packing caused a serious complication due to incomplete evaluation of the trauma patient. Physicians should select and use methods to treat epistaxis very carefully and be alert of unexpected complications at all times. They should not rush into nasal interventions without complete assessment of the stability of the cranial base, no matter how safe the procedure seems or how experienced they are.
  7 in total

1.  Intracranial migration of Foley catheter--an unusual complication.

Authors:  Sanjay J Pawar; Rewati Raman Sharma; Santosh D Lad
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.961

2.  Insertion of a nasogastric tube under direct vision.

Authors:  A P Jones; R Diddee; S Bonner
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 3.  Transcatheter embolization in the management of epistaxis.

Authors:  Gregory J Dubel; Sun Ho Ahn; Gregory M Soares
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Traumatic epistaxis: Skull base defects, intracranial complications and neurosurgical considerations.

Authors:  Anand Veeravagu; Richard Joseph; Bowen Jiang; Robert M Lober; Cassie Ludwig; Roland Torres; Harminder Singh
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2013-05-21

Review 5.  Use of nasogastric tubes in trauma patients--a review.

Authors:  E J Spurrier; A M Johnston
Journal:  J R Army Med Corps       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.285

Review 6.  Recent trends in epistaxis management in the United States: 2008-2010.

Authors:  Jennifer A Villwock; Kristin Jones
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 7.  Radiological diagnosis and management of epistaxis.

Authors:  Antonín Krajina; Viktor Chrobok
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.740

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.