Literature DB >> 30374467

The Host Response in Tissue Engineering: Crosstalk Between Immune cells and Cell-laden Scaffolds.

Leila S Saleh1, Stephanie J Bryant1,2,3.   

Abstract

Implantation of cell-laden scaffolds is a promising strategy for regenerating tissue that has been damaged due to injury or disease. However, the act of implantation initiates an acute inflammatory response. If the scaffold is non-biologic (i.e., a modified biologic scaffold or synthetic-based scaffold), inflammation will be prolonged through the foreign body response (FBR), which eventually forms a fibrous capsule and walls off the implant from the surrounding host tissue. This host response, from a cellular perspective, can create a harsh environment leading to long-lasting effects on the tissue engineering outcome. At the same time, cells embedded within the scaffold can respond to this environment and influence the interrogating immune cells (e.g., macrophages). This crosstalk, depending on the type of cell, can dramatically influence the host response. This review provides an overview of the FBR and highlights important and recent advancements in the host response to cell-laden scaffolds with a focus on the impact of the communication between immune cells and cells embedded within a scaffold. Understanding this complex interplay between the immune cells, notably macrophages, and the tissue engineering cells is a critically important component to a successful in vivo tissue engineering therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foreign Body Response; Macrophage; Mesechymal Stem Cells; Scaffold

Year:  2018        PMID: 30374467      PMCID: PMC6203342          DOI: 10.1016/j.cobme.2018.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng        ISSN: 2468-4511


  51 in total

Review 1.  Anti-inflammatory cytokines.

Authors:  S M Opal; V A DePalo
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Macrophage phenotype as a determinant of biologic scaffold remodeling.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak; Jolene E Valentin; Anjani K Ravindra; George P McCabe; Ann M Stewart-Akers
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Fibrous scaffolds potentiate the paracrine function of mesenchymal stem cells: A new dimension in cell-material interaction.

Authors:  Ni Su; Peng-Lai Gao; Kai Wang; Jin-Yang Wang; Yi Zhong; Ying Luo
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Synergistic protein secretion by mesenchymal stromal cells seeded in 3D scaffolds and circulating leukocytes in physiological flow.

Authors:  Virginia Ballotta; Anthal I P M Smits; Anita Driessen-Mol; Carlijn V C Bouten; Frank P T Baaijens
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 5.  Macrophage reaction against biomaterials in the mouse model - Phenotypes, functions and markers.

Authors:  R Klopfleisch
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 6.  The biological response to orthopedic implants for joint replacement. II: Polyethylene, ceramics, PMMA, and the foreign body reaction.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gibon; Luis A Córdova; Laura Lu; Tzu-Hua Lin; Zhenyu Yao; Moussa Hamadouche; Stuart B Goodman
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 7.  Tumor necrosis factor: a pleiotropic cytokine and therapeutic target.

Authors:  K J Tracey; A Cerami
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 13.739

Review 8.  Programmable Hydrogels for Cell Encapsulation and Neo-Tissue Growth to Enable Personalized Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Stephanie J Bryant; Franck J Vernerey
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 9.933

9.  Neutrophil Responses to Sterile Implant Materials.

Authors:  Siddharth Jhunjhunwala; Stephanie Aresta-DaSilva; Katherine Tang; David Alvarez; Matthew J Webber; Benjamin C Tang; Danya M Lavin; Omid Veiseh; Joshua C Doloff; Suman Bose; Arturo Vegas; Minglin Ma; Gaurav Sahay; Alan Chiu; Andrew Bader; Erin Langan; Sean Siebert; Jie Li; Dale L Greiner; Peter E Newburger; Ulrich H von Andrian; Robert Langer; Daniel G Anderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  VEGF may contribute to macrophage recruitment and M2 polarization in the decidua.

Authors:  Karen C Wheeler; Manoj K Jena; Bhola S Pradhan; Neha Nayak; Subhendu Das; Chaur-Dong Hsu; David S Wheeler; Kang Chen; Nihar R Nayak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  Inflammation via myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 signaling mediates the fibrotic response to implantable synthetic poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels.

Authors:  Luke D Amer; Leila S Saleh; Cierra Walker; Stacey Thomas; William J Janssen; Scott Alper; Stephanie J Bryant
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 2.  Biomaterials as a Vital Frontier for Stem Cell-Based Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Ahmed Nugud; Latifa Alghfeli; Moustafa Elmasry; Ibrahim El-Serafi; Ahmed T El-Serafi
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-03-24

3.  VEGF-Loaded Heparinised Gelatine-Hydroxyapatite-Tricalcium Phosphate Scaffold Accelerates Bone Regeneration via Enhancing Osteogenesis-Angiogenesis Coupling.

Authors:  Xu Chen; Chun-Yan Gao; Xiao-Yang Chu; Chun-Yan Zheng; Ying-Yi Luan; Xin He; Kai Yang; Dong-Liang Zhang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-08

4.  Mesenchymal stem cell-inspired microgel scaffolds to control macrophage polarization.

Authors:  Alexander S Caldwell; Varsha V Rao; Alyxandra C Golden; Daniel J Bell; Joseph C Grim; Kristi S Anseth
Journal:  Bioeng Transl Med       Date:  2021-03-21

Review 5.  The Future of Neuroscience: Flexible and Wireless Implantable Neural Electronics.

Authors:  Eve McGlynn; Vahid Nabaei; Elisa Ren; Gabriel Galeote-Checa; Rupam Das; Giulia Curia; Hadi Heidari
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 16.806

6.  Protein Based Biomaterials for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Applications.

Authors:  Stanley Chu; Andrew L Wang; Aparajita Bhattacharya; Jin Kim Montclare
Journal:  Prog Biomed Eng (Bristol)       Date:  2021-10-26

7.  Improved Immunoregulation of Ultra-Low-Dose Silver Nanoparticle-Loaded TiO2 Nanotubes via M2 Macrophage Polarization by Regulating GLUT1 and Autophagy.

Authors:  Yangmengfan Chen; Ming Guan; Ranyue Ren; Chenghao Gao; Hao Cheng; Yong Li; Biao Gao; Yong Wei; Jijiang Fu; Jun Sun; Wei Xiong
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-03-24

8.  A 3D Printed Composite Scaffold Loaded with Clodronate to Regenerate Osteoporotic Bone: In Vitro Characterization.

Authors:  Stefania Cometa; Maria Addolorata Bonifacio; Elisabetta Tranquillo; Antonio Gloria; Marco Domingos; Elvira De Giglio
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 9.  Advances on Bone Substitutes through 3D Bioprinting.

Authors:  Tullio Genova; Ilaria Roato; Massimo Carossa; Chiara Motta; Davide Cavagnetto; Federico Mussano
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Recent advances toward understanding the role of transplanted stem cells in tissue-engineered regeneration of musculoskeletal tissues.

Authors:  Dallas E Altamirano; Kathleen Noller; Eszter Mihaly; Warren L Grayson
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-02-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.