William Pickett1, Nathan King1, Barbara Marlenga2, Joshua Lawson3, Louise Hagel3, Valerie Elliot3, James A Dosman3. 1. Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario. 2. National Children's Center for Rural and Agricultural Health and Safety, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA. 3. Canadian Centre for Health and Safety in Agriculture, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Children are commonly injured on farms, yet no studies provide evidence about exposures that leave rural children visiting farms at risk. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to study (a) how frequently rural nonfarm children are exposed to farms, farm work and associated activities; and (b) the safety conditions and practices on farms being visited. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was administered in Saskatchewan, Canada to rural parents during 2014. Participation included reports on 458 farms visited by rural children, and then 549 children from 312 families who had been exposed to a farm in the past year. Child-level indicators included age, sex, farm safety education and training, engagement in farm work and play activities and exposure to specific farm safety hazards. Farm-level indicators included self-perceived safety conditions, and child supervision practices. RESULTS: One-third of the children sampled (n=549) had been exposed to a farm in the past year. Safety conditions, practices and supervision varied by demographic subgroup. Farm safety education and agriculture training were most common in the oldest age group (13 to 17 years; 24.7% and 9.2%, respectively) of which 40.8% had worked on a farm previously, averaging 10 hours/week (interquartile range 3 to 20) during summer months. Mechanized and nonmechanized work was observed for children of both sexes and rose with age. Physical hazards were reported both proximally (≤100 yards) and distally (>300 yards) to farm homes. CONCLUSIONS: Children who visit farms are potentially exposed to risk, and these risks increase with age as children take on formal work roles, leaving them vulnerable to farm injury.
BACKGROUND: Children are commonly injured on farms, yet no studies provide evidence about exposures that leave rural children visiting farms at risk. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to study (a) how frequently rural nonfarm children are exposed to farms, farm work and associated activities; and (b) the safety conditions and practices on farms being visited. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was administered in Saskatchewan, Canada to rural parents during 2014. Participation included reports on 458 farms visited by rural children, and then 549 children from 312 families who had been exposed to a farm in the past year. Child-level indicators included age, sex, farm safety education and training, engagement in farm work and play activities and exposure to specific farm safety hazards. Farm-level indicators included self-perceived safety conditions, and child supervision practices. RESULTS: One-third of the children sampled (n=549) had been exposed to a farm in the past year. Safety conditions, practices and supervision varied by demographic subgroup. Farm safety education and agriculture training were most common in the oldest age group (13 to 17 years; 24.7% and 9.2%, respectively) of which 40.8% had worked on a farm previously, averaging 10 hours/week (interquartile range 3 to 20) during summer months. Mechanized and nonmechanized work was observed for children of both sexes and rose with age. Physical hazards were reported both proximally (≤100 yards) and distally (>300 yards) to farm homes. CONCLUSIONS: Children who visit farms are potentially exposed to risk, and these risks increase with age as children take on formal work roles, leaving them vulnerable to farm injury.
Entities:
Keywords:
Agriculture; Child; Epidemiology; Farm; Pediatric; Work
Authors: Robert J Brison; William Pickett; Richard L Berg; James Linneman; Jamie Zentner; Barbara Marlenga Journal: CMAJ Date: 2006-06-06 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Barbara Marlenga; Richard L Berg; James G Linneman; Robert J Brison; William Pickett Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-12-28 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: William Pickett; Lesley Day; Louise Hagel; Robert J Brison; Barbara Marlenga; Punam Pahwa; Niels Koehncke; Trever Crowe; Phyllis Snodgrass; James Dosman Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2008 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Barbara A Morrongiello; William Pickett; Richard L Berg; James G Linneman; Robert J Brison; Barbara Marlenga Journal: Accid Anal Prev Date: 2008-01-31
Authors: Barbara A Morrongiello; Barbara Marlenga; Richard Berg; James Linneman; William Pickett Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2007-06-21 Impact factor: 4.634