Salini Mohanty1, Alison M Buttenheim2,3, Caroline M Joyce2, Amanda C Howa4, Daniel Salmon5, Saad B Omer4,6,7,8. 1. Department of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; smohanty@upenn.edu. 2. Department of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. Hubert Department of Global Health and. 5. Department of International Health and Health Behavior Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. 6. Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health. 7. Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine; and. 8. Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Abstract
: media-1vid110.1542/5804909532001PEDS-VA_2018-1051Video Abstract OBJECTIVES: In 2015, California passed Senate Bill 227 (SB277), eliminating nonmedical vaccine exemptions for school entry. Our objective for this study was to describe the experiences of health officers and immunization staff addressing medical exemption requests under SB277. METHODS: We conducted semistructured telephone interviews between August 2017 and September 2017 with health officers and immunization staff from local health jurisdictions in California. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for key themes. RESULTS: We conducted 34 interviews with 40 health officers and immunization staff representing 35 of the 61 local health jurisdictions in California. Four main themes emerged related to experiences with medical exemptions: (1) the role of stakeholders, (2) reviewing medical exemptions received by schools, (3) medical exemptions that were perceived as problematic, and (4) frustration and concern over medical exemptions. Generally, local health jurisdictions described a narrow role in providing support and technical assistance to schools. Only 5 jurisdictions actively tracked medical exemptions received by schools, with 1 jurisdiction facing a lawsuit as a result. Examples were provided of medical exemptions that listed family history of allergies and autoimmune diseases as contraindications for immunization and of physicians charging steep fees for medical exemptions. Participants also reported concerns about the increase in medical exemptions after the implementation of SB277. CONCLUSIONS: Participants reported many challenges and concerns with medical exemptions under SB277. Without additional legal changes, including a standardized review of medical exemptions, some physicians may continue to write medical exemptions for vaccine-hesitant parents, potentially limiting the long-term impact of SB277.
: media-1vid110.1542/5804909532001PEDS-VA_2018-1051Video Abstract OBJECTIVES: In 2015, California passed Senate Bill 227 (SB277), eliminating nonmedical vaccine exemptions for school entry. Our objective for this study was to describe the experiences of health officers and immunization staff addressing medical exemption requests under SB277. METHODS: We conducted semistructured telephone interviews between August 2017 and September 2017 with health officers and immunization staff from local health jurisdictions in California. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for key themes. RESULTS: We conducted 34 interviews with 40 health officers and immunization staff representing 35 of the 61 local health jurisdictions in California. Four main themes emerged related to experiences with medical exemptions: (1) the role of stakeholders, (2) reviewing medical exemptions received by schools, (3) medical exemptions that were perceived as problematic, and (4) frustration and concern over medical exemptions. Generally, local health jurisdictions described a narrow role in providing support and technical assistance to schools. Only 5 jurisdictions actively tracked medical exemptions received by schools, with 1 jurisdiction facing a lawsuit as a result. Examples were provided of medical exemptions that listed family history of allergies and autoimmune diseases as contraindications for immunization and of physicians charging steep fees for medical exemptions. Participants also reported concerns about the increase in medical exemptions after the implementation of SB277. CONCLUSIONS:Participants reported many challenges and concerns with medical exemptions under SB277. Without additional legal changes, including a standardized review of medical exemptions, some physicians may continue to write medical exemptions for vaccine-hesitant parents, potentially limiting the long-term impact of SB277.
Authors: Saad B Omer; William K Y Pan; Neal A Halsey; Shannon Stokley; Lawrence H Moulton; Ann Marie Navar; Mathew Pierce; Daniel A Salmon Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-10-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Daniel A Salmon; Saad B Omer; Lawrence H Moulton; Shannon Stokley; M Patricia Dehart; Susan Lett; Bryan Norman; Stephen Teret; Neal A Halsey Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Nakia S Clemmons; Paul A Gastanaduy; Amy Parker Fiebelkorn; Susan B Redd; Gregory S Wallace Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: S Cassandra Pingali; Paul L Delamater; Alison M Buttenheim; Daniel A Salmon; Nicola P Klein; Saad B Omer Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Paul L Delamater; S Cassandra Pingali; Alison M Buttenheim; Daniel A Salmon; Nicola P Klein; Saad B Omer Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Anne M Hause; Elisabeth M Hesse; Carmen Ng; Paige Marquez; Michael M McNeil; Saad B Omer Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Taylor A Holroyd; Amanda C Howa; Tina M Proveaux; Paul L Delamater; Nicola P Klein; Alison M Buttenheim; Rupali J Limaye; Saad B Omer; Daniel A Salmon Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2021-01-25 Impact factor: 3.452