Literature DB >> 30373835

Diverse segments of the US public underestimate the environmental concerns of minority and low-income Americans.

Adam R Pearson1, Jonathon P Schuldt2, Rainer Romero-Canyas3,4, Matthew T Ballew5, Dylan Larson-Konar3,6.   

Abstract

In a nationally representative survey experiment, diverse segments of the US public underestimated the environmental concerns of nonwhite and low-income Americans and misperceived them as lower than those of white and more affluent Americans. Moreover, both whites and nonwhites and higher- and lower-income respondents associated the term "environmentalist" with whites and the well-educated, suggesting that shared cultural stereotypes may drive these misperceptions. This environmental belief paradox-a tendency to misperceive groups that are among the most environmentally concerned and most vulnerable to a wide range of environmental impacts as least concerned about the environment-was largely invariant across demographic groups and also extended to the specific issue of climate change. Suggesting these beliefs are malleable, exposure to images of a racially diverse (vs. nondiverse) environmental organization in an embedded randomized experiment reduced the perceived gap between whites' and nonwhites' environmental concerns and strengthened associations between nonwhites and the category "environmentalists" among minority respondents. These findings suggest that stereotypes about others' environmental attitudes may pose a barrier to broadening public engagement with environmental initiatives, particularly among populations most vulnerable to negative environmental impacts.

Keywords:  climate change; diversity; social influence; stereotypes; sustainability

Year:  2018        PMID: 30373835      PMCID: PMC6298116          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1804698115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  11 in total

Review 1.  Changing Norms to Change Behavior.

Authors:  Dale T Miller; Deborah A Prentice
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 2.  Disproportionate proximity to environmental health hazards: methods, models, and measurement.

Authors:  Jayajit Chakraborty; Juliana A Maantay; Jean D Brender
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: some consequences of misperceiving the social norm.

Authors:  D A Prentice; D T Miller
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1993-02

4.  Estimating the national public health burden associated with exposure to ambient PM2.5 and ozone.

Authors:  Neal Fann; Amy D Lamson; Susan C Anenberg; Karen Wesson; David Risley; Bryan J Hubbell
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Identity-based motivation and health.

Authors:  Daphna Oyserman; Stephanie A Fryberg; Nicholas Yoder
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-12

6.  Making the environmental justice grade: the relative burden of air pollution exposure in the United States.

Authors:  Marie Lynn Miranda; Sharon E Edwards; Martha H Keating; Christopher J Paul
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Separate and unequal: residential segregation and estimated cancer risks associated with ambient air toxics in U.S. metropolitan areas.

Authors:  Rachel Morello-Frosch; Bill M Jesdale
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Should Governments Invest More in Nudging?

Authors:  Shlomo Benartzi; John Beshears; Katherine L Milkman; Cass R Sunstein; Richard H Thaler; Maya Shankar; Will Tucker-Ray; William J Congdon; Steven Galing
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-06-05

9.  Environmental inequality in exposures to airborne particulate matter components in the United States.

Authors:  Michelle L Bell; Keita Ebisu
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  National patterns in environmental injustice and inequality: outdoor NO2 air pollution in the United States.

Authors:  Lara P Clark; Dylan B Millet; Julian D Marshall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Environmentalism, norms, and identity.

Authors:  Thomas Dietz; Cameron T Whitley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Field experimental evidence shows that self-interest attracts more sunlight.

Authors:  Bryan Bollinger; Kenneth T Gillingham; Marten Ovaere
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  When Apologies become Meaningful: Perceptions of Apologies in Environmental Justice Communities.

Authors:  Michael J Perez; Jaren D Crist; Katie R Kirsch; Phia S Salter; Jennifer A Horney
Journal:  J Environ Psychol       Date:  2021-08-21

4.  Using qualitative approaches to improve quantitative inferences in environmental psychology.

Authors:  Neil A Lewis; Mario Bravo; Sarah Naiman; Adam R Pearson; Rainer Romero-Canyas; Jonathon P Schuldt; Hwanseok Song
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2020-05-28

5.  Interventions Based on Social Norms Could Benefit From Considering Adversarial Information Environments: Comment on Constantino et al. (2022).

Authors:  Stephan Lewandowsky; Sander van der Linden
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2022-10

6.  Characterizing public perceptions of social and cultural impacts in policy decisions.

Authors:  Nathan F Dieckmann; Robin Gregory; Terre Satterfield; Marcus Mayorga; Paul Slovic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Making the climate crisis personal through a focus on human health.

Authors:  Vijay S Limaye
Journal:  Clim Change       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.743

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.