Literature DB >> 30373832

Shear heating reconciles thermal models with the metamorphic rock record of subduction.

Matthew J Kohn1, Adrian E Castro2, Buchanan C Kerswell3, César R Ranero4,5, Frank S Spear2.   

Abstract

Some commonly referenced thermal-mechanical models of current subduction zones imply temperatures that are 100-500 °C colder at 30-80-km depth than pressure-temperature conditions determined thermobarometrically from exhumed metamorphic rocks. Accurately inferring subduction zone thermal structure, whether from models or rocks, is crucial for predicting metamorphic reactions and associated fluid release, subarc melting conditions, rheologies, and fault-slip phenomena. Here, we compile surface heat flow data from subduction zones worldwide and show that values are higher than can be explained for a frictionless subduction interface often assumed for modeling. An additional heat source--likely shear heating--is required to explain these forearc heat flow values. A friction coefficient of at least 0.03 and possibly as high as 0.1 in some cases explains these data, and we recommend a provisional average value of 0.05 ± 0.015 for modeling. Even small coefficients of friction can contribute several hundred degrees of heating at depths of 30-80 km. Adding such shear stresses to thermal models quantitatively reproduces the pressure-temperature conditions recorded by exhumed metamorphic rocks. Comparatively higher temperatures generally drive rock dehydration and densification, so, at a given depth, hotter rocks are denser than colder rocks, and harder to exhume through buoyancy mechanisms. Consequently--conversely to previous proposals--exhumed metamorphic rocks might overrepresent old-cold subduction where rocks at the slab interface are wetter and more buoyant than in young-hot subduction zones.

Entities:  

Keywords:  P–T paths; heat flow; metamorphism; subduction; thermal modeling

Year:  2018        PMID: 30373832      PMCID: PMC6243260          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1809962115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  2 in total

1.  Reevaluating carbon fluxes in subduction zones, what goes down, mostly comes up.

Authors:  Peter B Kelemen; Craig E Manning
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Strength of stick-slip and creeping subduction megathrusts from heat flow observations.

Authors:  Xiang Gao; Kelin Wang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 47.728

  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Differentiating induced versus spontaneous subduction initiation using thermomechanical models and metamorphic soles.

Authors:  Xin Zhou; Ikuko Wada
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 14.919

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.