Literature DB >> 30373794

Use of Translational Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Infection Models To Understand the Impact of Neutropenia on the Efficacy of Tedizolid Phosphate.

Jianying Xiao1, Charles Gill1, Lianzhu Liang1, Jenny Liu1, Jin Wu1, Hwa-Ping Feng1, Shawn Flanagan1, Christopher Tan1, Amy Flattery2.   

Abstract

Tedizolid phosphate, the prodrug of the active antibiotic tedizolid, is an oxazolidinone for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Studies in a mouse thigh infection model demonstrated that tedizolid has improved potency and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) compared with those of linezolid. Subsequent studies showed that the efficacy of tedizolid was enhanced in immunocompetent (IC) mice compared with neutropenic (immunosuppressed [IS]) mice, with stasis at clinically relevant doses being achieved only in the presence of granulocytes. The tedizolid label therefore contains a warning about its use in neutropenic patients. This study reevaluated the PK/PD of tedizolid and linezolid in the mouse thigh infection model in IC and IS mice using a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain (ATCC 33591) and a methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strain (ATCC 29213). The antistaphylococcal effect of doses ranging from 1 to 150 mg/kg of body weight tedizolid (once daily) or linezolid (twice daily) was determined at 24, 48, and 72 h after initiating treatment. In IC mice, stasis was achieved in the absence of antibiotics, and both tedizolid and linezolid reduced the burden further beyond a static effect. In IS mice, tedizolid achieved stasis against MRSA ATCC 33591 and MSSA ATCC 29213 at 72 h at a human clinical dose of 200 mg, severalfold lower than that in earlier studies. Linezolid achieved a static effect against MRSA ATCC 33591 in IS mice at a dose lower than that used clinically. This study demonstrates that, with time, both tedizolid and linezolid at clinically relevant exposures achieve stasis in neutropenic mice with an MRSA or MSSA thigh infection.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  linezolid; neutropenia; oxazolidinones; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics; tedizolid

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30373794      PMCID: PMC6325206          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00822-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  25 in total

1.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-positive cocci isolated from skin and skin-structure infections in European medical centres.

Authors:  Helio S Sader; David J Farrell; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 5.283

2.  Impact of granulocytes on the antimicrobial effect of tedizolid in a mouse thigh infection model.

Authors:  G L Drusano; Weiguo Liu; Robert Kulawy; Arnold Louie
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Analysis of the phase 3 ESTABLISH trials of tedizolid versus linezolid in acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.

Authors:  Andrew F Shorr; Thomas P Lodise; G Ralph Corey; Carisa De Anda; Edward Fang; Anita F Das; Philippe Prokocimer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of pathogens isolated from skin and soft tissue infections: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (United States and Canada, 2000).

Authors:  Robert P Rennie; Ronald N Jones; Alan H Mutnick
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of linezolid in healthy volunteers and patients with Gram-positive infections.

Authors:  Alasdair P MacGowan
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Tedizolid phosphate vs linezolid for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: the ESTABLISH-1 randomized trial.

Authors:  Philippe Prokocimer; Carisa De Anda; Edward Fang; Purvi Mehra; Anita Das
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of the novel antibacterial prodrug tedizolid phosphate.

Authors:  Voon Ong; Shawn Flanagan; Edward Fang; Howard J Dreskin; Jeffrey B Locke; Kenneth Bartizal; Philippe Prokocimer
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.922

8.  In vitro activity of TR-700, the active ingredient of the antibacterial prodrug TR-701, a novel oxazolidinone antibacterial agent.

Authors:  Ronda Schaadt; Debora Sweeney; Dean Shinabarger; Gary Zurenko
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Trends in US hospital admissions for skin and soft tissue infections.

Authors:  John Edelsberg; Charu Taneja; Marcus Zervos; Nadia Haque; Carol Moore; Katherine Reyes; James Spalding; Jenny Jiang; Gerry Oster
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Neutropenia induced in outbred mice by a simplified low-dose cyclophosphamide regimen: characterization and applicability to diverse experimental models of infectious diseases.

Authors:  Andres F Zuluaga; Beatriz E Salazar; Carlos A Rodriguez; Ana X Zapata; Maria Agudelo; Omar Vesga
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 3.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.